Possible problems

1. There is something wrong with the printing quality of the test paper.

2. The problem of students going in and out during the exam.

3, whether to follow the question of the bathroom.

It is true that some students cheat by deviating from the examination principles.

5. Who can enter the examination room without invigilation.

The examination room is a specific environment. Every time a candidate enters the examination room, he is like an enemy. His thoughts are often highly concentrated, and sometimes he will inevitably feel nervous, depressed and panicked. This is not conducive to the normal level, but also directly affects the test results. The emergence of unsupervised examination room is equivalent to giving candidates free space, relieving their physical and mental bondage and creating a relaxed and comfortable atmosphere for them to enter the examination state with a peaceful mind.

The purpose of invigilation in the examination room is to standardize the moral behavior of candidates, maintain the normal examination order and ensure the smooth progress of the whole examination work. There is a school in Beijing that is the first in China and has set up an unsupervised examination room. In a sense, it has some merits, but from a practical point of view, it should not be blindly imitated. In my opinion, the reason why that school dared to do so must be the decision made after a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the candidates and repeated deliberation. If, in other places, schools let unsupervised examination rooms appear without knowing the moral consciousness of candidates, the result will be counterproductive.

As we all know, cheating in the examination room is an immoral behavior. For candidates with strong moral awareness, it is the same whether they will come or not during the exam, and they can all take it easy. For candidates who are not diligent and good at cheating, there is no doubt that they have the opportunity to be invigilated in the examination room. They took the opportunity to cheat, so that his grades would be mixed with a lot of water. Cheating is a taboo in the exam. If left unchecked, it will disrupt the normal examination order, and all the examination rules and systems will become a dead letter, unable to reflect the principle of "fairness, justice and openness" in the examination, and the examination will lose its meaning.

In recent years, the media has continuously disclosed the fraud in a certain examination room, and local education departments have strengthened the supervision of the examination room. Even some places have installed electronic monitors in the examination room to cooperate with the invigilation work. Even so, cheating and violation of discipline still occur from time to time. Imagine, once the invigilator is relaxed, who will bear the responsibility if something really happens in the future?

Unsupervised examination rooms are different in nature from buses without tickets. Although they are all based on people's consciousness, if a person doesn't buy a ticket to get on the bus, the bus company loses only a few dollars, and if a person cheats in the examination room, the loss and influence are immeasurable. Therefore, I hope that the invigilator can not only relax the invigilation, but also do his duty and do his best to ensure the smooth progress of the exam. (Huafeng, Tani Village, Chengguan Town, Mianchi County)

There is no invigilator in the examination room.

In my opinion, if there is no invigilator in the exam, its disadvantages are obvious.

First of all, there is no guarantee that teachers can master students' real academic achievements by passing strict examinations. Students' exams have always been invigilated by teachers, and it is with the invigilation of teachers that the exam discipline can be serious, the students can be serious and the exam results can be true. If there is no invigilator, who will supervise those students who may make "small moves"? Who will maintain the discipline in the examination room? Therefore, there is no examination room for invigilators, and there is a great possibility of false grades. Secondly, students tend to neglect their studies and have opportunistic thoughts. Originally, for those students in the naive and lively era, learning is a hard thing. A little relaxation will make some playful children neglect their studies, and it is precisely because of the strict examination system that they have the pressure and motivation to learn. If there is no invigilator in the exam, some students will have the idea of cheating in the exam. In this way, they don't study hard at ordinary times, but they just want to muddle through in the exam. This is obviously not conducive to students' study. Thirdly, invigilation is the proper meaning of teachers' duties. Teachers can know the difficult problems of students through invigilation, which is certainly beneficial to improve teaching in the future. So I don't think it is appropriate to have no invigilator in the examination room.

(yima city Changcun Mining Office Sheng Yuan)

Let's start with the test.

The promise system of unattended invigilation is reasonable in its appearance and existence, but it is difficult to operate. Everyone has the problem of "self-discipline" and "heteronomy", and when there is no constraint, it will really be a little "ready to move". I have never been invigilated in the examination room, except once: when I was in college, I took an exam in international economic law. Because I answered in English, I felt very insecure, not to mention people who didn't work hard at ordinary times. Even the "elite" have the impulse to "think right"-there are always some "small moves" that make the four invigilators lose their eyes. I don't really want to cheat consciously, I just want to be more sure. It can be inferred from this that what should students do when they encounter this uncontrollable impulse?

Therefore, I suggest that this unsupervised measure should be implemented step by step, starting with some small knowledge tests at ordinary times. The usual quiz is to test the mastery of knowledge immediately, without the pressure of credits, and sometimes even the papers are not handed in for correction, and the atmosphere during the exam is relatively relaxed, so naturally cheating will not be used to measure the results. This will enable students to adapt gradually, and there will be no mistakes in the future because of unsupervised large-scale exams. ? Sanmenxia reader Zhang Liqun?

The exam is not cat and mouse.

I am a student of 15 years and a teacher of 15 years. Invigilate him before 15 and others after 15. In my opinion, no matter from the point of view of students or teachers, the new measure of "unmanned invigilation" is neither reasonable nor reasonable. Named "no invigilator", it seems to trust candidates, but in fact it shirks the obligations and responsibilities that teachers and invigilators should bear. In recent years, examination rooms in some places are chaotic, and candidates cheat from time to time. It is reasonable to have a strict examination system, but you don't have to be overwhelmed, angry and overcorrected. Because the supervision of the examination room is only to maintain the normal order of the examination room and ensure the fairness and justice of the examination, there is no cat-and-mouse relationship between the invigilator and the examinee.

I think as long as the invigilator strictly implements the system, normal examination room order can be established. The principle of my invigilation is "temper justice with mercy". Specifically, we should strictly control, broaden our horizons, choose key points and pay attention to details. That is, candidates should not bring anything into the examination room; During the exam, all candidates should be in sight, leaving no dead ends; There are several candidates who try to cheat, so you don't have to look at them one by one when invigilating, you have to choose; Liars are rarely blatant. If they reveal the clues in the details, they should focus on defense. Once cheating is found, it will not be tolerated and will be resolutely punished according to discipline.

? Lu Yu, a middle school in Lushi?

One-minute comment

Sublimation of respect

It is really gratifying that there is no invigilator to reform this examination method. This reform contains the most fundamental and minimum idea in pedagogy, which has been forgotten by many educators for a long time: respect for students' personality.

The speed and degree of mastering knowledge is not important, what matters is their respect for knowledge. Not cheating in exams is the most basic embodiment in this respect. Unsupervised is the sublimation of this aspect. Students should not only learn to respect knowledge, but also learn to respect themselves. (User Chen Guang)

Unattended invigilation is worth a try.

The initiative of unmanned invigilation is a good starting point, which can cultivate students' sense of responsibility and test students' personality. Unmanned invigilation requires candidates to have enough self-control, but students' ideological level is also mixed. Therefore, the supporting measures must be considerate to avoid unnecessary trouble.

? Wen Ming Road Dandan, Sanmenxia?

Prevent internal cheating

Cheating in the examination room is a kind of self-deception Using all kinds of external forces to stop cheating can only cure its fur, but not go deep into it. Only students deeply realize the importance of knowledge, realize that they can't advance in the future society without knowledge and ability, and really take exams as a means to test their knowledge. Only by recognizing this can we fundamentally put an end to cheating. At this point, whether someone invigilates is only a matter of form. (Mianchi reader Chen Hongfeng)

Expect unmanned invigilation system

The exam is only for teachers to know the students' knowledge, so that teaching can be focused and learning can be targeted. At present, the "Outline for the Implementation of Citizen Morality" is being widely studied throughout the country. With the in-depth development of this activity, people's ideological level will certainly be improved accordingly. Until one day, students do not study for fame and fortune, but "study for the rise of China" like Premier Zhou, then invigilation will lose its meaning. Therefore, I expect that this measure of unattended invigilation can be widely implemented. (Yima reader Zhu)

Some time ago, several schools in China began the experiment of "unmanned invigilation" one after another. The school said that this is an effective way to cultivate students' self-management and improve their sense of integrity. As a result, people praised Solomon as if he had found a treasure. There are also voices saying that it should be extended to all kinds of exams in the country, even the college entrance examination.

Let's look at a set of numbers first. On the eve of the college entrance examination in 2003, the Ministry of Education announced that it would impose heavy penalties on college entrance examination fraud. Even so:

Hubei handled 74 violations of the college entrance examination;

Hainan investigated and dealt with 58 college entrance examination students who violated discipline;

Fujian investigated and dealt with more than 50 college entrance examination violations;

Hebei investigated 192 cheating candidates in the college entrance examination.

It is not difficult to imagine what the result of the college entrance examination will be after using unattended invigilation. Therefore, for China under exam-oriented education, unsupervised invigilation is simply a false proposition. There are also various explorations of "honesty education", and the premise of not considering social costs is also a lot of false propositions.