Defendant Li Ping, male, 1967 65438, born on February 30th, Han nationality.
Li Yingbin, the plaintiff, and Li Ping, the defendant, were tried by a collegial panel composed of judges Pan Jing 'an, Yao and Dong Yanan at 438+00 on June 30th, 1965. Li Yingbin, the plaintiff, and Li Ping, the defendant, appeared in court to participate in the lawsuit, and the trial of this case has ended.
Li Yingbin, the plaintiff, claimed that I was introduced to the defendant in the autumn of 1994 and registered for marriage on February 2, 1995. 1June, 998 18 gave birth to a son named Li Yuting, who is now attending Xinyang No.5 primary school. Because of the poor emotional foundation before marriage, husband and wife often quarrel and fight for housework. The birth of a child failed to improve the relationship between husband and wife, and the quarrels between the two sides became more frequent. The defendant often hurts me. I don't have a regular job now, and the defendant won't give me financial help. I have a house now, which I bought with the money I bought from my job. To sum up, my relationship with the defendant has indeed broken down, and the two sides have lost the meaning of living together, so I appealed to the court and asked for a divorce from the defendant. Li Yuting, the married child, was raised by me, and the defendant paid 600 yuan a monthly maintenance fee, and paid 50% of the education and medical expenses before the child lived independently.
Defendant Ping Li argued that I had a good relationship with the plaintiff after marriage until 2006. After 2006, the relationship between husband and wife began to be tense. The plaintiff thought it was suspicious and disrespectful to the elderly, but the two sides did not reach the point of emotional breakdown. And the child is still young, and divorce is not good for the child's growth. At the same time, the two sides still have a certain emotional foundation. I don't agree to divorce. The plaintiff said that I hit her and didn't give her financial help, which is not true. My marriage with the plaintiff is related to this step, and both parties are responsible. But after many years of marriage, there is still an emotional foundation, and there is still the possibility of reconciliation. Personally, I am willing to do my best to maintain the relationship between husband and wife and maintain family stability.
It was found through trial that the plaintiff Li Yingbin and the defendant Ping Li were introduced in 1994, married on1February 2, 995, and on1June 8, 998, Hiuke had a son named Li Yuting. After the marriage, both parties have a house located on the west side of the 3rd floor, Unit 2, Building 2, Family Courtyard of China Construction Bank, Yimuhe District 107 National Road, Xinyang City (construction area 120 square meters, without property rights formalities), and there is no joint creditor's right. In terms of debt, the defendant issued a debit note to lend his mother-in-law 7500 yuan on September 12, 2006. The relationship between the defendant and the defendant was good at the beginning of their marriage. Recently, due to disagreement over family chores, disputes often occur, and the two sides lack the necessary emotional communication and exchange, which leads to tension between husband and wife. Therefore, the plaintiff appealed to the court on the grounds that the relationship between husband and wife has indeed broken down and the meaning of living together has lost, demanding that the original marriage relationship with the defendant be dissolved according to law.
The above facts are evidenced by the marriage certificates of both the original and the defendant, the loan receipt issued by the defendant, the on-site mediation agreement of public security cases, the mediation record and the trial record.
We believe that the defendant and the defendant met on 1994 and got married on12/995. It has been more than ten years now, and their marriage foundation is good. Recently, after marriage, the two sides have conflicts and disputes due to differences in living habits and trivial matters, but they are not enough to lead to a complete breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife. And the evidence provided by the plaintiff is not enough to prove that the relationship between husband and wife has indeed broken down. The defendant does not agree to divorce the plaintiff and has a good desire to improve the relationship between husband and wife. Family is the cell of society, and the stability of family can bring happiness and well-being among relatives, which is also a necessary condition for the healthy growth of children. At present, it is the best choice for both sides to maintain the relationship between husband and wife and strive to promote the healthy development of both sides. As long as the original and the defendant strengthen communication and exchange in their future common life, enhance understanding, and give and take the initiative to undertake their due family obligations, there is still the possibility of reconciliation between husband and wife; At the same time, in order to give the original and defendant a chance to save their marriage relationship, the original reason for asking for divorce could not be established, and our court did not support it. According to the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Article 32 of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China, the judgment is as follows:
The plaintiff Li Yingbin was not allowed to divorce the defendant Ping Li.
280 yuan, the case acceptance fee of this case, shall be borne by Li Yingbin, the plaintiff.
If you refuse to accept this judgment, you can appeal to Xinyang Intermediate People's Court through our court or directly within 15 days from the date of service of the judgment, and submit one original and two copies of the appeal.
Presiding judge Pan Jing 'an
Judge Yao
Judge Dong Yanan
20 10 July 1 day
Li Bo, the clerk.