The ID card can be said to be our most important document. Whether it's work, handling affairs or buying tickets, it needs to be used. The ID card is the verification of citizens in our country, the national distribution and an important document, and the design of the ID card will definitely be reviewed. Therefore, no one doubts that there is anything wrong with the ID card. However, Professor Wang of Tsinghua University pointed out that there are four obvious mistakes in our ID cards. If ordinary people point out that our ID cards are wrong, it may be taken as a joke. Professor Wang is unusual, not only a professor in Tsinghua University, but also a senior educator in the Ministry of Education. Deputy governor of the state, secretary-general of the kindergarten teacher award for primary and secondary schools. Of course, such experts will not inspire rivers. In his speech, he pointed out four languages on the ID card:

One: On the front of the ID card, it says: People's Republic of China (PRC) (PRC) People's ID card, and the defender (the head side) is a "citizen" (before that, I always thought that the head portrait was positive, and one side of the national emblem was on the other side, so I don't know how many boys are like me). Then the question comes: Is it a "resident" or a "citizen"? Citizens and residents have different concepts, residents living in People's Republic of China (PRC). A citizen is a citizen with People's Republic of China (PRC) nationality and is called a constitutional citizen.

In other words, residents are not necessarily citizens. Foreigners living in our country can only be called residents, not citizens. Our ID cards are only issued to citizens and passports are issued to foreigners living in China, so Professor Wang thinks that ID cards should be called "citizen ID cards" instead of "resident ID cards".

"Born" comes after the third line. Professor Wang believes that the expression is incorrect and accurate, and it should be the date of birth. The concept of birth is relatively broad, such as birth, birth family and so on. This statement throws two words, which is not rigorous.

Three of them: in the last line of the headband, the expression of "citizenship number" is inaccurate. Professor Wang believes that the number 18 is not the number of citizens, and citizens themselves are not numbers. This figure is the number of ID cards and should be expressed as "citizen ID number" instead of "citizen ID card". Finally, Professor Wang also thinks that the expression of the validity period of the ID card is incorrect. For example, the expression of a long-term valid ID card is: validity period: long-term. The validity period should be "from a certain day" to a certain day. "If it takes a long time, it should be expressed as long-term effectiveness. As a senior educator, Professor Wang observes problems very carefully. We usually see ID cards every day. There is no such problem, or at our level, we may not think it is a problem. Professor Wang has published it, and there are different opinions on the Internet. Some people think that these minor problems are in line with our daily use habits and will not affect the use of ID cards. Some people also give their own understanding of the problems pointed out by Professor Wang.

For example, if it is effective for a long time, it should be from "once a day" to "death" in the conventional way. If you write like this, it is obviously impossible. If people see such ID cards every day, what kind of emotions will they have? So there is no big problem in the growing period, and everyone can understand the meaning.