In 2007, after Yu Fajie was released from prison for three years and four months, he complained while collecting scrap iron and insisted on his own point of view. When he was a township head in 2000, the township finance was self-supporting and the financial management system was not standardized. At that time, in order to pay employees, the township financial staff asked Fajie to collect public funds of 6.5438+0.5 million yuan and made an iou. The purpose of writing IOUs is to facilitate reconciliation. However, the two courts in Luohe City held that this behavior violated the law. The IOU means that he can claim the creditor's rights and has the subjective intention of turning public funds into private money? . Yu Fajie believes that this is a presumption of guilt for himself.
Fajie v. 1 1 years later, the supreme court made a retrial decision: there was insufficient evidence for Yu Fajie to commit corruption. The Supreme Court of Henan Province made a criminal ruling, revoking the first-instance and second-instance judgments of the two courts in Luohe City and sending them back for retrial on the grounds of unclear facts and insufficient evidence.
20 19, 1 1, Yu Fajie's case was retried in Yancheng District Court. Eight months later, the Yancheng District Court ruled that? Irresistible reasons? The reason for suspending the trial.
Yu Fajie said:? Please, please again, don't delay the Yancheng District Court. Even if I continue to believe that I am a person who is not greedy for a dime, I respect it. ?
On August 12, 2020, Yu Fajie came to the Yancheng District People's Court again and asked the judge: What is in the criminal ruling? Irresistible reasons? What is the reason? The answer he got was still: no explanation.
Looking back on Sister Fajie's life, it is earth-shaking changes. From peasant college students to directors, they experienced serving their sentences and getting out of prison, complaining while collecting scrap iron, and ushered in the supreme law? Insufficient evidence? Retrial decision to get to the provincial high court? Insufficient evidence? Ruling, reasons for acceptance? Interrogation for irresistible reasons? Ruling.