One is analyzed by HR according to the resume of an ordinary undergraduate: the resume only says 985. The other is a speech by Zhang Xuefeng, a famous postgraduate teacher, on a program: Should college students take postgraduate entrance examinations?
In the final analysis, they all mean the same thing-reading is very useful and education is very important.
Q 1。 Are you successful with low academic qualifications?
There is only one Bill Gates in the world. I can't get into Harvard and I'm not qualified to drop out of Harvard.
Bill Gates is awesome, not because he dropped out of school. It is necessary to equate low education with success. One is that there is a problem with logical order, and the other is that there is a problem with statistical probability analysis.
People with low education may get along well, but people with high education usually don't get along too badly.
△ Bill Gates's father is a lawyer and his mother is an important figure in the business world. He was able to program to earn pocket money when he was in middle school.
Individual cases do not represent the whole. For example, all the people who make sense are hooligans. Is this case Ma Yun Jobs or a distant relative of the aunt next door?
Q2。 Why do some people say that reading is useless?
Reading is not the only way to succeed, but it is useless to sell reading to young people, either stupid or bad.
We heard in the community that many mala Tang sellers earn tens of thousands of dollars a month, work in massage shops and buy three suites. Here comes the opportunity. Can you copy their success? If you can't do it, then reading may be the most suitable way for you.
Some people say that there are at least two things in this world, and only those who have it are qualified to say that it is not important. One is money, and the other is education.
In Zhang Xuefeng's speech, a guest said that many of his companies had no higher education.
Zhang Xuefeng's rebuttal is very powerful: Why are none of the employees in your company from key universities? Is the company too high to look down on them, or are they too high to look down on your company?
Q3。 Is education important in employment?
Fortune 500 companies advocate that personal ability is more important than academic qualifications, but Fudan may be the lowest threshold for HR screening resumes.
A guest said: The best way for a college student to grow up should be to work. In constant frustration, he decided whether to take the postgraduate entrance examination, go abroad or continue to work.
However, if you don't have a degree, you will only face: no chance.
If the undergraduate school is not so good, it is daydreaming who wants to find a good job without upgrading his academic qualifications through postgraduate entrance examination, so how can he be asked to grow further?
Employment is a strange circle. "Almost all the top 500 companies in China tell you that academic qualifications are not important, but they will not go to Shuangfei University to hold job fairs." .
Every day, we hear big bosses say on the Internet that academic qualifications are not important, but attitude/spirit/courage is more important, but you can look at their recruitment websites and ask for higher standards.
So we can see that the top 500 companies are "lying" on the issue of recruitment.
Q4。 Is it discriminatory to emphasize academic qualifications in recruitment?
It is not discrimination that the educational requirements of enterprises for employees are different from gender, age and region.
In fact, we can understand that the reason why large enterprises do not talk about academic qualifications is also a kind of "political correctness" forced by public opinion. Once the criteria of "key universities", "985" and "2 1 1" are clearly defined in black and white, people will surely curse: you are discriminating against academic qualifications!
Can you ask yourself, is it academic discrimination to have requirements for academic qualifications? I'm afraid the answer is no.
There are always people who like to take ignorance as their personality and illiteracy as their true colors. Even if they have no education, they will not succeed. They also touted that "reading is not important, education is not important" and wanted to pull more people into the water. It's a pity that someone really believed it.