Undeniably, the newly graduated college students lack experience and work ability, but this is caused by the objective education system and China's current national conditions. Most higher education pays more attention to students' knowledge accumulation and cultural education, that is, to make students become talents with good knowledge reserves and cultural quality. I think this is the specific need of a country to improve the quality of its people. But this cannot be an important reason for enterprises to deny college students. Without experience accumulation and specific learning ability, college students have such learning ability.
In addition, some people think that many college students think too much of themselves, but their eyes are too high. I don't think this statement is correct. 1999 The expansion of university enrollment has made many college students realize that they are no longer favored by heaven. Universities are no longer designed for elite education. The intensification of social job competition has made more people realize that college students are just a very common title and no longer have a halo.
Nowadays, students around us no longer talk about the difficulty and bitterness of finding a job, so those who accuse college students of having too high self-esteem and too low vision should know more about college students now.
Today, I read an article by economist Lang Xianping, industrial chain conspiracy, a war without smoke. This paper analyzes the root of the employment problem of contemporary college students in China from the perspective of industrial chain, which I think is profound.
"Then I tell all readers why it is difficult for college students to find jobs. What kind of thinking do we have when the university expands its enrollment and merges so many students? Because the proportion of college students in our country is seriously lower than the average level in Europe and America, we mistakenly think that after training more college students, our economy will be more quality and develop at a higher speed. Where do we know? The premise of this idea is a question: Why do the United States need so many students, and why do so many outstanding college students in China have no jobs? Is it because our students are not qualified? Is it because our classmates don't study hard enough? Is it because our classmates are not professional?
Then please ask readers to do reverse thinking-what is the relationship between the industrial chain and the employment difficulties of our college students? Relationships are too important and unique. In the six plus one links of the whole industrial chain, one is what, the other is manufacturing, which is the bloody manufacturing industry, and the other is the six soft links from product design to retail. In the six plus one link, it is six, not one, that really needs college students. For example, there may not be a college student in the factory, from the chairman to the security guard at the door. Why? Because its essence is that it does not need college students. So what exactly do college students need? That is, six soft links in the industrial chain need college students, including product design, warehousing and transportation, raw material procurement, order processing, wholesale operation and terminal retail.
The so-called disadvantage is China, which is dominated by manufacturing. It has produced many sequelae, which readers should have fully felt. For example, many of our college students have to take postgraduate exams after graduation, and they will lose their jobs after graduation. Don't you think it's a great waste of talents to take the doctoral exam again, but do doctoral students still have to do undergraduate work? "
Professor Lang Xianping's analysis, I think, is from the root, rather than a superficial interpretation of social imagination. Now the state proposes to run more vocational and technical schools, and some high schools around me have been changed into technical vocational schools. Is this good or bad? I think we can find the answer from Professor Lang Xianping's works.
The problem in China now is not that we have too many college students but can't do anything, nor that we lack senior technical talents. What we need to do now is to adjust the industrial chain of the whole country.
Professor Lang Xianping also wrote in the article:
What is the industrial chain war? I take Barbie as an example. Barbie doll is also one of the toys exported from China. As we all know, there was a serious toy trade friction between China and the United States last year. The US government, Mattel and other American toy importers and retailers are critical of China's toy export products, such as raising the issue of excessive lead content. But when I heard the news, I wondered why the lead content exceeded the standard. How many returns are due to product design?
And do you know, taking Barbie as an example, in the manufacturing process, we destroyed our environment, wasted our resources and exploited our labor, but what was the real result? We made Barbie dolls worth one dollar, but in the end, the retail price of Wal-Mart in the United States was 9.99 dollars, nearly 10 dollars. I ask you to think it over. During the appreciation of one dollar to 10, 10 is reduced by one. Where does the value of these nine dollars come from?
Of course, I'm not saying that as a college student, I'm not responsible for the problem of difficult employment, which is entirely influenced by external environmental factors. We should also see that as college students, we are still quite lacking in innovation and technical research. While studying various basic courses, we should expand our hobbies, and expand our practical technical ability and social practice ability on the basis of hobbies.
University is not the liberation of high school, but also an important key to open the door to society.