This conclusion is an encouragement for students born in "double non-",that is, students who are not 2 1 1 and 985, and students who are facing employment and job hunting in the future. Employers' obsession with 2 1 1 even 985 has caused a lot of criticism in recent years. Some people think that the employer indicates "Don't take it unless it is 985" when recruiting, which is suspected of "academic discrimination". Even if the enterprise is not so explicit, hand in your education, HR will see whether your undergraduate course is the key, one or two, and score according to the stereotype, which basically determines whether to accept or not.
Some people think that we say that there are age discrimination and gender discrimination in job hunting, and there are also successful cases, but basically no one will take the employer to court because of "academic discrimination." Because these identities, such as age and gender, are naturally determined and cannot be changed by manpower; Education is the result of acquired efforts-even if you fail in the college entrance examination, you can "change your destiny" by going to graduate school or studying abroad.
According to this logic, the statement of "academic discrimination" is indeed logically inconsistent. Moreover, not only HR, but also foreign universities now recruit graduate students, and some of them are not 2 1 1. For example, some top universities in Britain, especially those in business, will clearly state that only 2 1 1 students will be admitted, and eight top universities in Australia will gradually increase the admission scores of domestic students applying for 985, 2 1 1 and non-2 1. Can you say that foreign universities discriminate? I can't. Why? Because under normal circumstances, whether it is a school or an enterprise, there is only one principle for selecting talents, and that is merit-based admission.
Of course, common sense knows that non-key universities also have diligent and excellent students, and key universities also have graduates with poor grades. A degree certificate does not represent the degree of hard work and Excellence, but at best it is a reference. But HR faces Cheng Shan's resume application every year. From the perspective of reducing workload and improving efficiency, it has to take shortcuts and set some thresholds to limit the number of resumes. The basic assumption is that students who can be admitted to key universities have strong ability, and the teaching environment and atmosphere of universities for four years are better than those of ordinary universities, and they may have more knowledge. As for the online rumor that the top 500 companies will not hold job fairs in Shuangfei University, there are also public relations and corporate image considerations (just like employees of large companies are on a business trip and ask to stay in a five-star hotel, because staying in a cheap hotel will make the company "fall in price"), it really doesn't mean that you are not excellent.
The world is like this, how to fight back? In addition to proving that HR is wrong with our own continuous efforts, to subvert the logical chain of "school prejudice", we must not take the usual path and play cards according to common sense. Artificial intelligence changes with each passing day. In the past, some "golden rice bowls" were in jeopardy. Today, big companies and top 500 companies can't guarantee that you can sit back and relax for a lifetime. It is king to keep learning and improve your gold content. Similarly, students of 985,211should also break the concept that only the top 500 students can go.
What can you do? What do you do in the company? What are your strengths now and in the future? Considering these longer-term problems is more important than following the crowd and working in a big company that everyone admires.