2. The original contract is considered as a revocable sales contract, and after the original sales contract is decided to be revoked.
3. According to the treatment method after the termination of the contract, in the end, Cheng Can can only be ordered to return Zhu Jun's Songyang Baihan Map.
4. At the same time, the return journey was ordered to be 6.5438+0.7 million yuan; At the same time, it is impossible for the court to sentence Liu to bear any legal responsibility.
5. Therefore, if Zhu Jun adopts this litigation strategy, it is impossible for the court to order the cancellation of the original sales contract, and then order the other party to compensate him for the loss of 87 1.9 million yuan. This kind of litigation scheme is not feasible in law.
Case prototype: "The appraiser Liu and the buyer Cheng bought the painting by deception, which led to their great misunderstanding and finally traded obviously unfair. In this regard, in September of 20 1 1, the brother appealed to the Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court, requesting the court to cancel the sales contract and sentenced the two defendants, Liu and Cheng, to compensate them for their losses of 87190,000 yuan. "