What the interviewer must do before the interview is to study the resume of the candidate. Don't think it's for hr, the interviewer must watch it and study it. Therefore, a qualified resume should leave a good image for the interviewer, have a certain understanding of you and convey a certain value. These three points are the core values of resume and the purpose of writing resume. A good resume may have different contents and forms, but it plays a similar role.
Unfortunately, although job hunting is very important for college students and graduate students, there is no course in the school to teach how to write resumes, and students often can't find a good learning method and can only rely on their own understanding. It is often Baidu's job to write a resume at the end, then find one or two templates and follow the gourd painting gourd ladle. This is absolutely unacceptable! Before writing a resume, the first thing to do is to have a correct attitude and take it seriously. This is also the basis of everything.
According to my personal judgment, the importance of resume in job hunting exceeds 50%, so be careful!
So how can I write an excellent resume? As the saying goes, unfortunate people have their own misfortunes, while happy people often have similar happiness. The same is true for resumes. Bad resumes have their own problems, while excellent resumes tend to converge. So we can start in the opposite direction. What are the most common problems in writing a resume? How should it be avoided?
Resume change outline
Of the hundreds of resumes I have read, 70% have similar problems? Write a resume as an outline. Not only freshmen, but also many old people who have worked for a long time.
Aside from the technical ability and level of resume description, there is a big problem just by looking at the method and content it describes. What gives me the greatest feeling is that I am too sincere, which is also a common problem of many programmers. This is why many people always complain that people who work are better than those who speak PPT. In fact, there is no contradiction between doing a good job and telling more people (bosses) what you have done. Therefore, honesty is a good thing, but it is very necessary to package yourself within a reasonable range and improve your expression ability. This is not a matter of flattery, but a reasonable and legal ability.
Going back to the resume itself gives me the biggest feeling that it is like the job description on the recruitment website. From his description, I can completely imagine his daily work, but is there any other information besides that? Let's compare the three uses of resume, can we leave a good image? Not salty or light. I don't feel anything. May I know who he is? No, I can only see him doing this job. Can you convey his value? It doesn't seem good either.
So obviously, the description of this paragraph is problematic. Unless it can be proved that the interviewer is looking for someone who can use hadoop, lr and gbdt, it is difficult to consider this resume qualified.
This is the most common and biggest problem when we write resumes? Write your resume as an outline of your experience and only convey what you have done.
Analysis and improvement
The resume we want to write is not just an outline of experience, we need to convey more information in the resume. Not only your previous work experience, but also what kind of person you are, what characteristics you have (and what makes you qualified for this position).
These four points are expanded, which can actually be condensed into two points. The first point is the basic information, that is, the basic information of previous projects. The second point is idiosyncratic information, that is, information about the applicant's idiosyncrasies, characteristics, specialties and abilities, which is also commonly known as? Highlights? . It is difficult to take these two points into account at the meeting, because the form of resume limits our expression and we can't make a long speech. Actually, it's true. The simpler the resume language, the better the connotation. So the first thing we need to do is to simplify.
Simplify this part of the basic information as much as possible, and try to convey more implicit information. For example, just now, we can modify it like this:
Responsible for the development of 58 Group user portrait system, including real-time and offline systems. Mining user behaviors, preferences and basic information, and making user tags to support major business scenarios.
Based on the understanding of user portraits, a user tag system is constructed, which is fully responsible for cleaning up multi-terminal logs in hadoop cluster.
Explore the rapid expansion algorithm to analyze large-scale user relationship networks, and apply it to the identification scene of online user relationship groups, which will bring xxx promotion.
Responsible for the landing of advanced algorithms such as LR+GBDT in tag mining and extraction, and achieved xxx results.
Also responsible for the development of auxiliary tools to promote the improvement of the whole algorithm process.
Although the content is the same, it certainly looks different. Some seemingly insignificant expressions can actually convey a lot of potential information. Like what? Based on the understanding of user portraits? It conveys that you have a deep understanding of this field, not just accepting the job. ? Explore xxx algorithm? It can not only reflect your pursuit of technology and learning ability, but also show that the performance improvement it brings can not only increase persuasiveness, but also let the interviewer see the value of recruiting you. If he happens to be doing something similar, he will think you can come in handy. There are some similar expressions, and I will list them one by one for you to fine-tune.
In addition, because I have made a portrait of the user, I didn't understand this expression well. Because it can't reflect his understanding of this position and the core value of this job, I still focus on what I have done. According to my understanding, the greatest value of this post is actually to help the downstream business departments, such as helping to recommend and improve the results, helping to improve the accuracy of search results and so on. So it's best to reflect this in the description and highlight your understanding of the core value of this position.
Don't write a lot of words, don't brag against your will, just be around? Deliver as much value as possible? This is enough for us to write an excellent resume. Of course, it is not enough to study writing routines, but also to really think about and understand what we have done in the workplace, in school and in projects, and to tap the value of them.
Misunderstanding and correction
Many people think of resumes. Just write down your previous experience clearly, and the interviewer will naturally ask.
I have to say that this idea is all wet, not to mention that not all interviewers will ask questions about resumes. Even if you do ask questions, because of the differences in cognition and understanding, the interviewer may not be able to ask the key points of your experience or get your core value. Similarly, through the interview, some people evaluate S and others evaluate B. Is it just that the number of questions answered is different? Or is the number of algorithm problems different?
Obviously not. The core of interview is value, and question-and-answer is just a form of reflecting value. The content in a resume can also convey a lot of value. There is only one purpose for us to write a resume, that is, to maximize the value, to play the cards in our hands as well as possible, and to strive for as many advantages as possible for our job search.
For example, suppose you are a search engineer, and your job with colleague A is to design algorithms to optimize search results. You work hard and spend a lot of time studying and working in your spare time. Because you keep up with technology hotspots and cutting-edge technologies, you and your colleagues have optimized many search results at your suggestion. If you just write it on your resume, you are responsible for optimizing the search results and applying the so-and-so algorithm to bring about a significant improvement in the results. Suppose A applied for the same position and wrote the same description, how do you distinguish it from A in your resume?
If A is good at writing resumes and interviewing, he is likely to get a higher position and salary in the end. If this happens, will you feel unfair?
But it's not fair. You didn't write your resume yourself. Responsibility, love of technology, enthusiasm for work, leadership and deep understanding of the position are not reflected in the resume. Can you blame the interviewer for not asking questions during the interview?
In addition, the resume also has a very important role, which is to take the initiative. In our general understanding, job seekers are passive in the interview because we don't know what the interviewer will ask. Actually, it's not. Excellent job seekers can take the initiative, and one of the skills is through resumes. Also use the above example, for example, if you are a search engineer, you have only made achievements in a certain field and don't know much about some related fields. If your establishment description is very general, then the interviewer will examine your understanding and ability in the whole search field, and will probably ask you questions that you can't handle or are not good at.
With a resume, you can adjust the description, weaken some parts that you are not good at and emphasize some parts that you are good at. You can even deliberately leave a little doubt at a certain point to guide the interviewer to ask questions and discuss them in depth, thus guiding the interviewer to ask questions. Of course, this is a high-end interview skill and ability, so I won't go into details here, but taking the initiative is a common way.
Summary: Resume is the facade of the interview. Writing a brilliant resume is very helpful for the follow-up interview and is a profitable thing. After learning it, you can use it in every interview in the future.
Writing a good resume is not to brag or exaggerate our achievements, but to show our highlights as much as possible, so that the interviewer can better understand us and our abilities and specialties. For job seekers, it is also very important to carefully sort out the logic and write a high-quality resume. Writing an excellent resume can not only leave a better impression on the interviewer, but also review and summarize your career. In the process of writing a resume, an excellent interviewer can basically guess what the follow-up interviewer may ask, so as to make targeted preparations.