There are indeed many women who live a very exquisite life. When they go out, they must dress up carefully, don't go out without makeup, their lips are red, their skin is white and their body is fragrant, their steps are light and graceful. No matter where you go, it is a striking scenery.

Drinking coffee by the lake on sunny days and playing with Four Treasures of the Study at home on rainy days make the whole person live like a picture-in-a-picture. A woman with an exquisite life has no word "make do" in everything in her life, and her home is usually as clean as a model room.

Everyone likes to appreciate and praise exquisite women, and maybe there is a sense of distance. So, is living exquisitely the most basic dignity of a woman? In fact, I think this view is very problematic.

Living exquisitely is only a choice of personal attitude towards life, and has nothing to do with dignity. Dignity is a person's inner strength and wealth, which has nothing to do with the outside.

Like Priscilla. The girl who came out of this slum has never lost herself. As Zuckerberg's wife, she looks ordinary, has an ordinary figure, has an ordinary temperament, and has ordinary food, clothing, housing and transportation. There is no trace of rich people, which has nothing to do with exquisiteness. But this does not affect Zuckerberg, as her younger brother, being attracted and influenced by her kindness and inner wealth, fully accepting her values and outlook on life, nor does it affect the public's one-sided praise of her.

There is also Guo Jingjing as a domestic model, and such examples are never lacking.

Who will say that Priscilla and Guo Jingjing live without the basic dignity of women? They live to be themselves, not just Zuckerberg's wife and the daughter-in-law of the giants.

In this world, there are still most women who live without delicacy. Don't those women have the most basic dignity? Once this argument is thrown out, I am afraid that countless people will come out to oppose it. Everyone has the right to choose a lifestyle that he likes and feels comfortable. Life is careless, people who are not refined don't have to feel inferior, and people who are refined don't have to despise others.

I often thank myself for being born in an inclusive era. No matter how maverick I am, I can find a comfortable position and straighten myself.

In such an era when singles, same-sex love and love between grandparents and grandchildren can find living space and be tolerated, how can people be too harsh on a woman who just lives a less refined life? Just because life is not exquisite and has no basic dignity, it is too high for women.

In today's society, women are already superhuman. At home, I am a good wife and mother, a daughter-in-law, a daughter, a mother, a tutor, a cook, a doctor, a driver and a cleaner. Outside, I quickly became a strong woman and an elite in the workplace.

Women are given too many roles, although they are probably too tired. Apart from so many roles, is it cruel to define exquisiteness as the most basic dignity of women? Is it fair to want a woman to be a vase and a vase to be a superman?

Define exquisiteness as the most basic dignity of women. If this is said by men, give them a sentence "It's easy to stand and talk". Why can a man have no dignity if a woman is not exquisite? If it is said by a woman, please stand up and refuse the struggle of the same kind. We are born from the same root. What's the hurry?

If the social aesthetics degenerates to the mode of only exquisite women, it will be the sorrow of all mankind.