Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Resume - The inspiration of Clouds on the Sea is how to do one thing to have strength.
The inspiration of Clouds on the Sea is how to do one thing to have strength.
First, "Kyushu? Enlightenment from the story of grazing clouds at sea

Watching the TV series Kyushu? "Mu Jiyun at Sea" is a virtual fantasy TV series with historical theme, in which the "enlightenment" of the sixth prince Mu Yunsheng is very interesting.

The spirit of Mu Wudao said a passage: There is no secret art in this world, only the way to see the world is different. This sentence finally made Mu realize that everything in the world can be regarded as dust. They can be too small to see, but it doesn't mean they have no power. The way to mobilize the invisible forces in the world for yourself is through "mysticism".

This insight is quite the essence of Laozi, mysterious and mysterious. I won't tell you why, and you shouldn't know too well. Anyway, you just know this shady thing is useful.

This passage in Mu's "Awakening" gave me an inspiration: everything in the world must be organized and disciplined to have strong power, otherwise it will be like a piece of sand and useless.

Second, why are poor people always poor, and why do busy people always have no time?

Only organization and discipline can play a role, and this truth is also reflected in the book Scarcity I recently read.

The author of Scarcity is Cederhill? In the process of studying the poor for a long time, Mullenathan found that the poverty of the poor is essentially the same as his anxiety caused by lack of time, which is difficult to change. If you give money to the poor, they will soon squander it, and it is difficult to use it to improve their lives. You give busy people a lot of time, and they can't arrange it reasonably, wasting their time. Therefore, the author concludes that the essential reason why poor people can't be rich and busy people can't be efficient is that these people with scarce resources always pay too much attention to scarce things and it is difficult to focus on things that can improve the status quo.

Summarize this book in one sentence: people who lack certain resources for a long time will become short-sighted and unable to make effective use of resources.

For example, the poor will weigh every penny in their hands over and over again, but they are unwilling to give it up, and they can't plan to use it in things that are beneficial to them in the future.

Buy a health insurance or go to the dentist, or invest in production tools, and you won't see an immediate improvement in your life. Lack of money makes the poor stingy, afraid to spend every penny, and eager to enjoy it when you have a surplus. This painful memory of scarce resources is rooted in your brain and body, and you will react instinctively. Even if you realize it, it is difficult to resist your instinct.

Is there any way to change this situation? Yes, the author says it is to change the bandwidth of the mind. Just like a computer, upgrading software and hardware or reducing programs running in the background can improve the running speed. Changing the bandwidth of thinking is to leave enough resources for yourself, reduce unnecessary expenses and let yourself do things efficiently. For example, the poor reduce their non-survival expenses, and busy people do more tasks at the same time.

The core of these measures is to improve their own ability, rationally organize the resources around them, and be substantive and efficient.

Third, why is learning and doing things inefficient?

After a year of fitness, the fitness instructor told me that you have good physical fitness, standard movements and hard training. It stands to reason that your body shape will be greatly improved and improved, and your body fat content should not be so high. There must be something wrong. After discussion, the coach thinks it's because I exercise irregularly.

This made me reflect on my habit of doing things. I like to do many things at the same time. Often do one thing for about 60 minutes and then switch to something else immediately, resulting in everything just getting by. Over time, the advantages accumulated in the initial stage of a skill will soon disappear. Although the friends who study together have made slow progress, they are getting better and better because of long-term continuous concentration.

All these experiences reflect one thing: those who can't arrange resources in an organized and disciplined way can't form a joint force, a strength and an effectiveness.

Just like the bricks and tiles of a house, they must be organized and regularly combined to carry the functions. The function of this house can not be realized by one brick and one tile, but by an organized and regular combination of 10 thousand bricks and one tile.

Just like people's attention, no matter how many books you read, as long as this kind of attention can't be organized and disciplined, you can only get temporary pleasure from it, and excessive relaxation of this pleasure will damage long-term deep happiness.

Just like the accumulation of knowledge and skills training, these knowledge and skills can solve problems, not by one knowledge point or one action, but by thousands of knowledge points and thousands of actions. After long-term, organized and disciplined training, they can be strongly expressed.

Poverty, busyness, lack of attention, inability to follow up and do something for a long time, and inability to love someone for a long time are all seemingly frustrating things. Further, isn't it that a person can't arrange his own resources in an organized and disciplined way?

So I boldly assume that if things want to express themselves forcefully, they must be organized and disciplined.

Why can habits change a person, make or destroy a person's life? Isn't it because habit is a long-term, organized and disciplined performance of a series of actions? This organized and disciplined expression can form great power, enough to change anyone's life. So can we check the source of ineffectiveness by checking the organization and regularity of our work? The law of life needs a lot of argumentation, but you might as well give yourself a bold assumption.