Recently, I am helping the company to screen resumes, all of which are resumes in the direction of IT technology. Damn it, the world is so big and magical, which has opened my eyes. But how to judge the quality of a resume makes me very confused.

Some people write resumes like poems; Some people are just a form with photos, just like the application form filled out by government agencies;

Some people's resumes are only in English, but not in Chinese. Does this mean that his English is very good?

Some people's resumes are very awkward: short sentences, all aligned on the left, a bit like Gu Long's novels. But they did well in the final interview.

What surprised me most was that I saw a resume today, which said 10 programming languages. Is this person a big cow, a madman or a novice who likes to look around?

Cool Shell, a well-known technology blog in IT circle, has an article "How do other programmers look at your resume", which impressed me deeply. It lists "I wrote an operating system or compiler" as the highest sub-item in its resume. I found a resume saying that he had completed a compiler, and his resume was directly passed by another screener. How do you explain this?

I am still a buddy, and the quality of my resume has a strong relationship with the interviewer's mood that day. what do you think?

In fact, what I want to know is not limited to IT technology. Other technical resume evaluation methods are also worth learning.