Sophie's world reading notes 1500 words
Philosophy does not appear as the profound thinking of idle people, but as something that is unified with life. Sophie and Albert need to use philosophy to understand their world. But they are not at odds with others. They can be sure that their world is Abbott &; MiddotNag's creation, but just because people don't have an answer about the origin of their own world (or universe), doesn't mean they can't ask this question. In fact, as Judd emphasized throughout the book, if you want to be a philosopher, you can't stop asking questions. Albert tried to make Sophie realize how great her own existence was. People's questions may not have any answers, but this is nothing, because it is the ability to ask questions that makes us human. Why are we here and what is a good life &; In Judd's view, all these philosophical activities mentioned in the book & mdash& ampmdash In Judd's view, all these philosophical questions mentioned in the book are the most important questions that people can ask. Once people's physical health is guaranteed, people must pay attention to their spiritual life. Life is a gift, and the only way to make life meaningful to individuals is to keep asking these questions. Philosophy is unique and stands out from other disciplines, because Judd actually puts philosophy and survival as equally important. If people lack philosophical speculation in life, they will deprive themselves of the greatest pleasure and reduce their original understanding. Philosophy is a continuous and lifelong pursuit. Only humans on earth can think philosophically. Although philosophy may not make life easier or give easy answers, it will make people curious about their own existence. Although philosophy is quite complicated, its main idea is simple.
If Sophie's World represents the philosophical views of mainstream intellectuals, what it expresses is also extremely eye-catching. This book gives a very lofty evaluation of true philosophy: critical, rational and fair comments; Get rid of prejudices, superstitions and customs; Do not make hasty and rash judgments, but pursue truth, knowledge, beauty and virtue.
In this book, Judd's real interest in philosophy is not in logic, mathematics or linguistics. When the focus of the story shifted to Marx, Freud, Darwin and cosmology, Moore, Russell and others didn't even mention it. Some topics, even if they have nothing to do with philosophy, appear repeatedly. Obviously, this book is very pleasing in political position. All modern fashionable words are included: ecology, feminism, tolerance, eastern religions, comparative religions, the United Nations and the new world order. This way of writing may be to make philosophical issues out of touch with the times, or to cover a wider readership. However, it gives readers the impression that these issues seem to be the author's real concern.
This is not "a novel about the history of philosophy", but a contemporary humanist who supports nature's selective discussion on the root of philosophy. At the end of the novel, science is recognized as the judge of truth; Although the doctrine of materialism is not clear, it is definitely the best choice for mankind. This book leads readers to such a conclusion, but it doesn't actually provide reasons. The impression it gives readers is that it is the result of the accumulation of wisdom in past dynasties; Of course, different history will lead to different endings. What impressed me most about this book was a letter from Sophie's tutor called Strange Creatures. The rabbit metaphor mentioned above seems to me to be really appropriate and suitable for our present life, including children and adults. A crying baby just came to this world, full of curiosity about everything, facing the world with strange eyes. Then they grow like rabbits' fine hairs, pleasantly surprised. But with the growth of age, constant struggle and continuous progress, they will go deeper and deeper into rabbit hair and move towards the most comfortable fur layer. Therefore, they live and work in peace and contentment there, feeling very bound, and will not venture back to the fragile rabbit hair. Only a philosopher would take this dangerous step. Some of them fell and failed, but others clung to the rabbit hair. But those who nest in the depths of comfortable and soft rabbit hair and eat and drink to their heart's content are still discussing their unchanging topic: how much has the stock price risen today? What's the price of so-and-so now? & amphellip& amphellip A series of household chores, put in your mouth, are equivalent to chewing a piece of bubble gum. So get out of the trivial daily life, and don't just be satisfied with the comfort and warmth at this moment. Soaking in a honey pot is refreshing, but it will gradually kill your will. Let's have a rest and see the outside world. On the top of rabbit hair, I once again seem to see the world for the first time.
Sophie's world reading notes 1500 words
When I was tidying up the bookcase at home, I found Sophie's World on the bookcase. Halfway through junior high school, I thought, what are these people talking about? There were many strange words that I couldn't understand, so I ran aground.
Today, I found that I almost missed a wonderful book, the enlightenment reading of the development history of western philosophy. From Socrates to Hegel to Marx, these great western philosophers have promoted the development of philosophy and society from generation to generation. I want to talk about my feelings after reading this book in two points.
About the fault tolerance rate:
I like the story of the emperor's new clothes very much. Finally, the child pointed to the naked emperor and said, you are obviously naked! Philosophers play the role of children in society. You cried and told me that fairy tales were lies. Yes, what is the real society like? Socrates was taken to court on trumped-up charges because of his curiosity, which was incompatible with the mainstream thought of the world at that time. He was sentenced to death for denying the existence of God and misleading teenagers. If you want to add a crime, why not have nothing to say! Socrates represents the conscience of Athens. When the Athens court sentenced him to death for his conscience, the city was like a walking corpse.
If in the society at that time, I am not sure that Socrates' thought must be right, I agree with his practice. Socrates only violated the interests of some people. Affected their rule. Including later Copernicus. You want me to die, I have to die.
On the other hand, it is amazing to look at this simple version of the history of western philosophy. Put forward an idea, which was quickly criticized. Plato thinks that everything in the world should have a perfect model like the one of gingerbread man's cookies (some people want to eat gingerbread man cookies), but Aristotle opposes that there should be a concrete model first, and then a commonality should be abstracted. Let's watch these philosophers promote the development of world concepts from generation to generation. There is a fault tolerance rate in the world, which has been getting higher and higher until now, and it has been working hard for two or three thousand years.
This reminds me of a literary lecture in Beijing, probably about Tao Yuanming's "Picking chrysanthemums under the east fence and seeing Nanshan leisurely". The old professor did not deny Tao Yuanming's recluse spirit and noble sentiment in the whole lecture. From his explanation, that poem is quite different from the current mainstream thought. In ancient medical books, the ancients believed that chrysanthemum had the effect of prolonging life and affirmed the medicinal value of chrysanthemum, while Tao Yuanming's hometown had mountains, but the mountains were not in the south but in the north, so why did Tao Yuanming write "Seeing Nanshan leisurely"? Nanshan here means longevity is better than Nanshan. Perhaps Tao Yuanming's picking chrysanthemums under the east fence will prolong his life, which is longer than Nanshan.
Although I have discussed it with others, it seems that everyone thinks it is nonsense, and it is a serious nonsense. The ultimate goal is that I should study hard and not attend some messy lectures &; If hellip wants to know the truth of this incident, I'm afraid he can only ask Tao Yuanming himself. The professor just offered another way of thinking.
To be a man, we still need to have a critical spirit and complete the negation of inner negation in order to achieve sublimation. Don't be afraid to make mistakes. It is normal to make mistakes. Do you want to leave the mistakes made at the age of 20 to the age of 30 and the big red lipstick that you like at the age of 20 to the age of 30?
About ruling and being ruled:
Because of this book, I read some related external history. Share it with my friends here. We know that ancient China experienced several dynasties change from north to south, and the nomadic people in the north always bullied the farming people in the south, which is quite interesting. Later, when I saw ancient Greece, this happened.
It is rumored that he studied under Aristotle's Alexander all the way south and swept the Middle East. Without the Himalayas, I don't know how to directly intersect with ancient China, which is far from the point. Macedonia constitutes a huge imperial territory. They conquered ancient Egypt, Persia and other places by force. Many of these cities are called Alexandria. So the conquering side must be the more advanced side of civilization? The answer is no. When Alexander invaded other countries, including the Jewish people. Everyone knows that it was at this time that _ _ evolved from Judaism, spread from the Middle East to Europe, and became the largest religion in Europe.
By the way, another interesting thing is that the ancient Greeks lived a rich and happy life, so they always insisted on living in this world and did not talk about the afterlife with others. The more unhappy an unhappy region is, the more it places its thoughts and feelings on the afterlife, which leads to the afterlife religion. _ _ is a manifestation of the afterlife religion. Have you pinned your hopes on the afterlife?
_ _ The rule of Europe is the rule of ideology, which is more terrible than aggression, isn't it? So it's not necessarily who can laugh last &; Hellip, that's why you have to have something in your head so that you won't be easily controlled. When there is nothing in your mind, you should look at some mainstream thoughts to avoid being brainwashed.
Sophie's world reading notes 1500 word three
When I read Sophie's World, it was my senior year and last semester. At that time, many people began to look for jobs, and I was one of them. For me, who has just entered the melting pot of society from school, it is a kind of luck to read this book at this time. I remember when I borrowed this book from the school library, the librarian aunt said to me half jokingly, "What, changed it to philosophy?" "I think this book is relatively new." I answered her like this. In this way, Sophie's World became the first philosophy book I have ever read.
At the beginning of this book, Sophie, the hero of 15 years old, received a letter with only one question & mdash& ampmdash; "Who are you?" . Now that I think about it, it really takes some thinking to answer these three simple questions. Yes, who am I? I'm Yang. But does this simple statement really solve this problem? Obviously not, because people with this name don't know how many, and the three-word code doesn't mean anything. Let's put it another way: I'm a Java programmer, floating in Beijing. My name is Yang. This seems to answer this question. But it's just like, who knows if there is a city called Beijing on another planet in the universe, and what is Java? Besides, did you answer Sophie's question just to show your identity? Not exactly.
The existence of human beings is not just a field code similar to a unique ID.
Descartes said a sentence in the book: Cogito, ergosum (I think, therefore I am).
On the surface, people exist because they can think. Man, a thinking primate, and his own behavior constitute a small world. There is a saying in Dong Fangbubai: "Some people have grievances. Where there are grievances, there are rivers and lakes. People are Jianghu. How did you quit? " While reading this book, I think the so-called rivers and lakes here are the world. Explain this sentence with the big data environment we are in now, that is, a person has his own real identity, and real identity has various relationships in real life. At the same time, he left different virtual identities and virtual relationships on various websites, and the existence of different identities and relationships constituted the richness of the whole world.
Thinking has made human civilization, and at the same time it has been accelerating the pace of world progress. However, in today's society, although science and technology are developed, people are increasingly lacking the initiative of philosophical thinking. Just like the network we contact every day, it brings us convenience in reading information, but also causes the lack of knowledge innovation, because since things on the Internet are readily available and effortless, why do we need to explore and think? It is always not as convenient as CTRL+C and CTRL+V, which directly leads to the laziness of thinking and the sorrow of philosophy.
Having said that, I am reminded of Milan Kundera's words in The Unbearable Lightness of Life: When human beings think, God is laughing. Why is this? Looking up the meaning of this sentence, we can easily find that it means that human beings should realize their own smallness and ignorance, and expand and spread their own thinking on this basis.
Sophie's world reading notes 1500 word four
After reading the previous chapters, I thought that the protagonist of this book was Sophie and her philosophy teacher Albert, and the more I went down, the more strange I felt. At the philosophical banquet of Sophie's 15th birthday, I gradually realized that the real protagonist of this book is Sid and her major father, while Sophie and Albert are just the characters written by the author-the characters portrayed by Sid's father, the major. The major created these two people and their experiences, and wrote a book as a birthday present for his daughter Sid. Strangely, under the major's pen, Sophie and Albert gradually felt the existence of this creator and knew that their destiny was in his hands, so through their own efforts, they finally got rid of the major's control and achieved success. This idea that the creator escapes from the arranged fate makes me feel subtle, and even my thinking is a little distorted.
Nan Fang Shuo, a well-known writer, commented on this book: "In the novel part of Sophie's World, Sophie's subjective consciousness process is quite similar to detective novel plus modern version of Alice in Wonderland, philosophy plus detective, fantasy plus cosmology, which makes people suddenly enlightened. Isn't this the most classic definition of philosophy's love for wisdom? " It awakened my curiosity about the world and my thinking about the ultimate meaning of life!
This is a book about philosophy, which has led us through the history of philosophical development for thousands of years. From the original naturalist philosopher to rationalism, to the classical philosopher, to the prosperous Greek culture, Indo-European culture, Semitic culture, dark medieval culture, to the suddenly enlightened Renaissance and Baroque period, as well as modern Descartes, empiricism, romanticism, materialism and existentialism. . . . . . The rich content has taken us through the vicissitudes of life and given us a baptism and sublimation of philosophy. After all, so many philosophers have so many theories since ancient times, and with the development of history, their understanding of the world and the nature of life is constantly improving and innovating. With modern education, we have watched the development of philosophy, some absurd explanations of the world by ancient philosophers, or some philosophers' brand-new perspectives on the world, and these sudden and oncoming ideas. Some of our original ideas have indeed been greatly impacted, and we have also begun to think about the world in a brand-new way.
In my understanding, philosophy is to care about and explore our world. This is actually a question that everyone living in this world should think about. And the process of gradually establishing our own outlook on life and outlook on life can also be regarded as thinking about philosophy. For example, at the beginning of the book, the author puts forward two philosophical questions: Who are you? Where did the world come from? Such questions also reflect the task of philosophers, that is, to think and explore the answers to questions about the nature of life and the world. Since ancient times, many philosophers have put forward their own views, but no theory can convince all mankind, so countless successors are needed to give their own answers. Contrary to unfathomable concepts, each of us can study philosophy. Maybe we can't all be philosophers, but we can all be philosophical thinkers to find the meaning of our existence.
In fact, every philosophical thought and philosopher who criticizes the current situation through the ages is based on "Who are you?" "Where did the world come from?" "Is there a God and a soul?" And other seemingly unanswerable questions. How to answer these questions? The book provides some clues: "just use your common sense", "stand on the top of rabbit hair" and "explore the world with children's eyes, that is, don't be paralyzed by the world, observe the world around you carefully and dare to express your thoughts. Then why not combine what you have learned in books with what you have seen and heard in life and create your own philosophy?
Although people have different views on various schools of philosophy in history, those philosophers should be respected. They are so brave and persistent in exploring the mysteries of truth and practice. The world of philosophy is also a dream and an illusion. It's like an incredible myth, but it comes from all the ordinary things around us.
However, we can now clearly know the causes of wind, frost, rain and snow, and also know why apples fall to the ground and why rockets can fly to the moon. All this is thanks to those who have not abandoned or rekindled curiosity. It seems that these people don't understand the world, don't believe it, and don't recognize it. They doubt, they think and they reform. So with the benevolence and righteousness of Confucius and Mencius, with the freedom of Laozi and Zhuangzi; So there was Plato's Utopia, Copernicus's Heliocentrism; So there is romantic irony, so there is experienced experience; So there was Descartes' dualism, and then there was Marx's Capital. Since ancient times, how many ancestors have tried countless ways to climb the top of rabbit hair, and how many people are still making unremitting efforts. And we, who are used to ease and accept the truth, shouldn't be ashamed of our numbness and laziness? Shouldn't we wake up and catch up?
Knowledge can be accumulated and skills can be passed on, but life experience and rational understanding can only be gradually realized from scratch. Shangdi is fair to philosophers of all ages, giving them a lifetime to think independently. This may be the reason why philosophy has not answered the original question for thousands of years. So we don't have to stay away from philosophy. As long as we are curious and thinking, we will get closer to the truth. Philosophers don't know more than us, but they are more curious and think more than us, so they see through the surface of things and grasp their internal relations. This kind of curious ability, this kind of thinking ability, God also gave us.
The metaphor at the end of "Maybe We Are Stardust" is that we are just a flash in the pan without any mystery in this universe, and the universe is still running and hovering. What will it be like? We never knew that the world was so big, there were countless mysteries I hadn't solved, and there were countless spaces I hadn't experienced. Because of this, we should keep exploring. Let go of philosophy and listen to their soaring voices &; hellip& amphellip
Sophie's world reading notes 1500 word five
In a bookstore, I saw a book, Goodbye, Sophie. Isn't this a romance novel? 60% off! There was a strange light in my eyes, but I felt in my pocket. There was not much left. Later, I found Sophie's World on another shelf. Is this about goodbye, Sophie? It seems mysterious &; Hellip& amphellip OK, I'll take this book.
Suddenly found himself looking for trouble. Why should I buy such a disgusting book? However, with reading, I seem to find that this book has a feature &; The trouble is certain, but I don't know why, I am particularly fascinated. I even stayed up from twelve noon to midnight. Although I didn't learn much knowledge, the knowledge here is too rich, from astronomy to geography. Just the names of people make me dizzy, but the scope of this book is still limited. For example, China's philosophy is rarely mentioned in the book (if you want to talk about the history of China's philosophy, it is estimated that you can't finish it in three days and three nights).
I like Greek mythology very much. I think Greek gods are very close to me because they have the characteristics of ordinary people. China's spiritual reading is too far away for me, and I have a feeling of "being able to see from a distance without being ridiculous". The book Sophie introduces the history of western philosophy, and I have a wonderful feeling about how human beings have progressed. Philosophy is the knowledge about wisdom, which is a new term for me. I have always thought that philosophy is a very complicated subject, which is reasonable and has nothing to do with the history of science. From studying Sophie, I realized that philosophy is a neutral course, including all subjects, but I must study hard all my life.
Jostan Judd is a very competent teacher, a very humorous teacher and an imaginative person. For example, there are some fairy tale characters in the book that are impossible to appear in reality, such as Little Red Riding Hood and Alice, all of which are very lovely imaginations. And the way he teaches &; Mdash& ampmdash Writing letters and talking (as for DVD, we can't see it, only Sophie knows what it feels like) is particularly colorful compared with other philosophy books. I think he must have thought about it for a long time. As for Sophie, what is it? There are many answers, which can be the history of western philosophy, an overview of scientific development, or a mysterious novel & hellip& amphellip.
"Who are you?" "Where does the world come from?" The seemingly simple and complicated problems not only puzzle Sophie, but also puzzle readers. Later, the author became Abbott and answered Sophie (readers) one by one. What philosophy is this? Who can be a philosopher? Here, doing so gives a very clear answer &; There is only one condition to be an excellent philosopher: curiosity. Of course, children meet this requirement best, and we can often see that children like to ask questions at the end. When explaining philosophy, the author used a classic metaphor: about the white rabbit, it is best to compare it to the whole universe, and we humans are microscopic insects living in the depths of rabbit hair. But philosophers always try to climb the rabbit's fine hair in order to see the magician clearly.
Besides, the author is very talented, and he uses a bold and unconstrained style. If he doesn't write well, it is likely to make people confused. The mystery in his book is linked by a letter from a stranger, a girl named Sid, and a mysterious hut. It's so mysterious. At first, the mystery can be solved, but the more I get to the back, the more confused I am. Bananas with words, money found on the road, star movies and so on can only be seen in movies, which makes me even more doubt whether this is a suspense drama. It was not until "Berkeley" that the secret was revealed. Sophie turned out to be a character in a book. Is this written on purpose to increase readers' interest? No, his idea is that Sid is a real mission and Sophie is a character like Little Red Riding Hood, so she can see Little Red Riding Hood, Alice, Adam and Eve&; Hellip& amphellip Sophie is fictional, she can understand this very well, but she still keeps seeking the truth. Philosophy influenced Sophie's world, and Sophie also influenced Sid. Both girls know each other's existence. Perhaps the author wants to explain that Sophie is not only a novel character, but also a person in people's minds. He gave Sophie and Albert souls and made them look like ghosts in "reality". But this is contrary to his previous philosophy of no ghosts and gods. But in fact, this is not contradictory, because these are all made up by Abbott. Isn't it cute to write a novel with such characteristics?
As a novel salesman, Sophie has nothing to do with love novels. It can open people's eyes, discover the wonders of the world, have a preliminary understanding of philosophy, and perhaps inspire people to become philosophers.
Related articles:
1. Comment on Sophie's world 1500 words 5 articles
2. Sophie's World Review 1500 words
3. Five ideas about Sophie's world.
4. Sophie's world reading notes three model essays.
5. A 2000-word model essay on the history of western philosophy.