I found Zhihu's relevant answer. First of all, it is doubtful whether the report of anonymous users is true. Secondly, the answer has been folded, and housekeeper Zhihu suggested revising it.
No complete screenshot of the original post was found. There are only the following fragments: This is the original source of the rumor that mobike executives are corrupt by hundreds of millions. It was three days ago.
Searching for Hu Weiwei in Baidu is mostly because of the recent negative news about corruption.
On May 1 1, the source of China Net report and today's headlines came from Zhihu netizens who broke the news. At the same time, the time is after 14 pm. It's only ten minutes away.
China Economic Net was also reported, but the author was not marked. However, China Economic Net gave a complete answer at an anonymous netizen in Zhihu: "Wang Xiaofeng used investors' money to launder money and embezzled hundreds of millions. Each car got a rebate 100, 40 locks and 60 cars. During the Spring Festival this year, tens of millions were distributed to everyone, and Xu Hongjun, director of Wuxi, mobike, also took 20 million, all in cash. Now do you know why mobike says his car is expensive? Before Wang Xiaofeng was fired from Uber, it was because he used user information to sell money. "
In addition, according to the newspaper:
Personally, I habitually doubt the truth of the newspaper's report. Because most of the "news" sources of the paper are "according to the news" and "according to the news of netizens", who are the netizens? Is this news reliable? Has the news been verified? We don't know. Later, it was verified that the news was not in line with reality and appeared many times. However, I have never apologized or clarified. Poor credit, I don't know if this time is true or not.
It also involves mobike's rival ofo. A few days ago, ofo was also exposed to corruption in Zhihu. Judging from the news of relevant netizens and the response attitude of ofo, it has basically been implemented, but the amount of corruption and the specific list of corruption are not clear. Mobike's response also pointed to ofo's malicious rumor.
"On May 3, the same netizen asked about the working atmosphere of ofo anonymously on a social platform, and a user who was certified as a former employee of ofo replied below that the internal management was in a mess, the system was chaotic, and corruption was serious from the top to the grassroots.
In this regard, ofo said in the response to the paper,'' Please believe that we have zero tolerance for corruption. Once verified, we will never tolerate it, and we will handle all corruption incidents fairly and fairly. '''
Is it true that anonymous netizens in mobike broke the news? Does it have anything to do with ofo? I don't know. It's hard to judge.
In the competition between mobike and ofo, I hope the media will stick to their professional ethics.
Initially, it was because "how do you think the cost of mobike is as high as 6,000 yuan?" The problem triggered the news of anonymous netizens. Assuming the news is true, according to the data of mobike's annual output of 5 1 10000 yuan and the corruption of each car 100 yuan, the amount of corruption of three senior executives in mobike will be as high as 560 million yuan.
According to the published information, mobike raised about 3 billion yuan, and the user deposit was as high as 4 billion yuan. In fact, the profit of deposits is also a considerable figure. Hu Weiwei responded to the use of the deposit and set up a special bank account to keep it. But the use of this fund is not transparent.
At present, mobike has reported the case to the police. I'm waiting for the results of the investigation by the people who eat melons and other relevant departments.