Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Resume - How to evaluate Zhang Shaogang's performance in "All Happy"?
How to evaluate Zhang Shaogang's performance in "All Happy"?
Personally, I'm more Zhang Shaogang. It's not so easy to be a live host. The key point is that when I watch the video, to be honest, even though Guo Jie is not a fake degree, his performance is really poor. I think most people questioned him for the first time, including the people at the scene. I think you are the only one who has never seen a similar situation before, so I think everyone, including the host, has been fooled. Besides, fake academic qualifications and the like are not new now, which will naturally arouse people's resentment. So I noticed that Zhang Shaogang was also very helpless and embarrassed and said, "I'm going to say something I shouldn't say again." Obviously, he also knew that his "poison tongue" had an impact, but he had to say it at that time. Don't many of us now think that society lacks people who dare to speak? Would the program continue to be so awkward and deformed if it hadn't been smashed at that time? That's irresponsible to the audience.

In a word, what happened later is based on Guo Jie's performance, which makes people have to doubt him to a great extent. Even if what happened later remains to be determined, there is really no way not to think about it at that time. According to the performance at the scene, Zhang Shaogang also expressed doubts. (Even if part of Guo Jie's education is true, it's really too watery. For example, French sociologists who study sociology in France don't know about it. This kind of education should not be written on your resume. As for fainting, didn't you watch the video? The whole scene was stunned. Nobody expected such a thing to happen. The same is true of the host, plus most people at the scene thought that this person was fake or super-water. I wonder if it is normal for that man to faint to stop that embarrassing scene. The host was caught off guard and asked if you were performing. Note that this is a problem and a problem. I think it is this kind of questioning that makes me feel that Zhang Shaogang dares to speak out, perhaps because he expressed his disgust at such a common thing as fake academic qualifications.

As for not helping him, I think too much, such as being cold-blooded. Can anyone figure out what to do in that situation in advance?

Those who support Zhang Shaogang dare to speak. . . . . . The key is to take risks that may lead to criticism and have courage.