In a word, what happened later is based on Guo Jie's performance, which makes people have to doubt him to a great extent. Even if what happened later remains to be determined, there is really no way not to think about it at that time. According to the performance at the scene, Zhang Shaogang also expressed doubts. (Even if part of Guo Jie's education is true, it's really too watery. For example, French sociologists who study sociology in France don't know about it. This kind of education should not be written on your resume. As for fainting, didn't you watch the video? The whole scene was stunned. Nobody expected such a thing to happen. The same is true of the host, plus most people at the scene thought that this person was fake or super-water. I wonder if it is normal for that man to faint to stop that embarrassing scene. The host was caught off guard and asked if you were performing. Note that this is a problem and a problem. I think it is this kind of questioning that makes me feel that Zhang Shaogang dares to speak out, perhaps because he expressed his disgust at such a common thing as fake academic qualifications.
As for not helping him, I think too much, such as being cold-blooded. Can anyone figure out what to do in that situation in advance?
Those who support Zhang Shaogang dare to speak. . . . . . The key is to take risks that may lead to criticism and have courage.