A few days ago, with the approval of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the Commission for Discipline Inspection of the CPC Central Committee filed a case review on Lu Enguang, a member of the former party group of the Ministry of Justice and director of the Political Department. After investigation, Lu Enguang's age, party member materials, work experience, education, family situation and other comprehensive fraud, long-term deception of the organization; Money to clear the way, all the way to buy officials and seek glory, from a private entrepreneur to a deputy ministerial cadre step by step; Also officials and businessmen, control and operate a number of enterprises, and seek benefits for enterprises through improper means; Oppose organizational censorship. In order to seek illegitimate interests in job promotion and enterprise management. He gave a huge amount of property to the national staff and was suspected of accepting bribes.
In order to be an official, to be a big official, and to be an official for a few more years, Lu Enguang is deliberate. Judging from the information reported on CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection's website, Lu Enguang made a comprehensive fraud in terms of age, party member materials, work experience, education and family situation, so that some netizens exclaimed, "If gender can be faked, would Lu Enguang have become a woman?" Undoubtedly, the falsification of cadres' files is an act of dishonesty in government affairs. Lu Enguang's act of "completely forging" personal files not only violated the party discipline and state law, but also violated the law. In the end, being put on file for review was really self-inflicted, deserved it, and was not worthy of sympathy at all.
However, it is worth noting that the falsification of official files is a complex "project", which is often not completed by counterfeiters alone, but operated by a large group of people in collusion. Taking academic fraud as an example, a seemingly simple academic thesis needs the joint participation of license issuing agencies, public security departments, archives management departments and organization departments. As long as one of the staff in these departments dares to be true, it will be difficult to successfully complete academic fraud. Unfortunately, in the case of Lu Enguang's file fraud, the fraud was not once or twice, nor was it a day or two. The file audit from ordinary party member to leading cadres was not a round or two, but Lu Enguang was able to go through customs several times and was promoted all the way while making fraud. How do "completely fraudulent" officials rise all the way? This question is thought-provoking.
In fact, judging from the cases of official document fraud investigated in the past, there are all kinds of people behind them without exception. For example, the former Secretary-General of Taiyuan Quality Inspection Association was helped by Wang, then Director of Organization Department of Taiyuan Municipal Commission of Commerce and Trade, Director of Personnel Department, and Li Moumou, Director of Taiyuan Financial and Trade Comprehensive Development Center. Another example is that Wang Yali, the former deputy secretary of the Shijiazhuang Municipal Committee of the Communist Youth League, known as a "fake cadre", was illegally employed as a national cadre and joined the party by fabricating false identities, cadre files and work experience. In the case of Wang Yali, a total of 12 responsible persons were disciplined or even criminally punished. It can be seen that fake files are easily "released" by joint fraud.
It is never too late to mend. In recent years, there have been frequent incidents of falsification of official files, which have aroused strong social repercussions. The author believes that to curb the unhealthy trend of official file fraud, we should not only dismiss the fake officials, but also thoroughly investigate all kinds of corruption problems that may exist in them. More importantly, we should plug the loopholes in supervision and management and thoroughly investigate the accomplices behind the "all-round fraud" officials, so that counterfeiters and those who help them pay a heavy price. On this basis, we should also explore the establishment of a transparent and sunny management mechanism for official files, strengthen public supervision, and find out the falsification of official files in time. Only in this way can we dispel the fluky psychology of those who try to get promoted by file fraud, and fundamentally prevent fake officials from being born and rising all the way.