1. success factors of interview if you can show your talents and experience; If you can let the examiner appreciate your eloquence and adaptability; If you are polite and keep a gentle attitude, all this is good, but if it doesn't help you open the door to victory-being admitted, it will be in vain. The ultimate goal of the interview is to succeed in the interview and get the position. There are no two identical leaves and no two identical interviews in the world. We don't have "winning skills", but the following winning principles may help you succeed in the interview. (1) convince the examiner that you are the best candidate for the vacant position. The main goal of the interview is not to make the examiner like you, appreciate you and admit your advantages, but to make them admit you. Examiners often set a set of conditions for ideal candidates in advance, and then examine the candidates one by one to see who is the most suitable and competent for the job. They choose not a genius or expert in a certain field, but the most qualified person with all kinds of qualities. Therefore, candidates should bear in mind that the examiner's duty is to select the most suitable person. Your whole job search plan (including cover letter, resume and finding someone to write a recommendation letter) and interview performance should convince them that you are the one you are looking for, and don't waste time on other irrelevant issues. (2) convince the examiner that you have the sincerity to do this job. Even if your ability, work experience and other qualifications convince the examiner that you are a suitable candidate, if you are not sincere about the unit or job, you are unlikely to be admitted. In other words, the examiner must believe that if you are accepted, you will accept it and do it seriously. If you put on a nonchalant or even "take part in accidental amusement" attitude and are not serious about your career, or make the examiner think that you just want to "ride a donkey to find a horse" and have no long-term plan, then no matter how excellent your qualifications are, they may not hire you. (3) convince the examiner that you are valuable to the company. Why did the company hire you? Because you are useful and valuable to the organization, you can bring benefits to them after joining. Many people forget this obvious truth in job interviews. In the interview, they are obsessed with introducing their various advantages and don't know how to convey these basic information centrally. Joining me is particularly beneficial to your organization. To this end, candidates must make some targeted preparations before the interview, such as understanding the company's current situation and difficulties, understanding the nature and tasks of vacant positions, making plans, and even conducting simulation drills. When asked relevant questions, they can definitely and convincingly say, "What will happen after I come to work in your company …" Applicants should remember that the company hired you not because of you, not because of your talents or strengths, but mainly because of you. 2. interview failure factors the following attitudes and performances of candidates are likely to arouse the examiner's disgust and easily lead to interview failure. (1) Nothing annoys the examiner more than being late. Don't be late for a long time without taking the initiative to explain the reasons, or find some inappropriate reasons, such as living far away, not knowing where the company is, or even forgetting the interview time. (2) I don't know anything about the applicant. If you apply for a civil servant position, you can't tell the names and responsibilities of relevant government departments. Why do you want to be a civil servant? Answer: "Everyone knows that the position of civil servants is stable and secure." This must not happen. (3) completely passive If you are completely passive and silent, you will answer "yes" or "no" after the examiner repeatedly guides and encourages you to speak. In this way, it is difficult for the examiner to make an in-depth evaluation of your various qualities, and it is easy to arouse the examiner's dislike for you, and your hope of being admitted is naturally slim. (4) Put on an idle posture, or walk into the interview room without knocking at the door, and then the whole person is half lying in a chair, showing a listless look. You don't listen attentively to the examiner. And when it's your turn to talk, you don't want to look at them. Arrogant attitude is especially bad for examiners in small-scale units. Repeatedly ask about the size of their unit, promotion system, training opportunities, etc. Ask them why they need to hire someone with high qualifications like you for this job, when they will promote you, or what position you can be promoted to within two years. Will get you out of this job. (5) Rude and self-centered, regardless of others-extremely rude behaviors such as interrupting the examiner's speech and smoking without permission will only make you fail in this interview. When the examiner asked you how to deal with some problems, you said you hadn't thought about it. Anyway, you have to cross the bridge to get here. When you are asked to put forward specific plans, suggestions or constructive opinions, you are vague. Simplifying questions everywhere, giving play to critical genius everywhere, and pointedly pointing out that the person in charge of something is so ignorant now … all these will leave a very bad impression on the examiner. 3. Pay attention to the "three commandments" in the interview. Anyone who takes part in the interview, regardless of your quality or level, must not forget that he was selected by the employer, and remind everyone to always pay attention to the following "three commandments": (1) Don't try to be brave and don't be smart. Some candidates will be free, energetic and superior as soon as they enter the interview room. Whether people like it or not, take the initiative to shake hands with the examiner and sit down safely; I always think that the questions asked by the examiner are easy. When answering questions, I always like to start with something like "I think" and "I advocate", and I always say it is right or wrong. I really couldn't answer some questions myself, but I was smart enough to ramble on, preferring to answer "digression" rather than be an honest man. Doing so is not only easy to make jokes, but also makes the examiner feel that you are not modest, and you are more virtual than real. In addition, you will think that you are irresponsible and lack a sense of responsibility when answering questions. (2) Some students who are arrogant are among the best in written test and have superior conditions in all aspects, so they are arrogant. In the interview, he was arrogant and aggressive. First, when the examiner is dissatisfied with his answer or gives good-will guidance, he tries to argue irrationally and refuses to admit that his answer is wrong; Second, I always want to take the initiative in the interview, and I often ask the examiner some questions that are not directly related to the interview content, such as what is the housing condition of the employer? I will hold any position, just as the employer has decided to hire him (her), and the interview is to talk about conditions; Third, when asked about the work of the original unit, you can't keep calm, often belittle the leadership and work of the original unit and deny the achievements of others. In the interview, excessively objectively belittling the leadership work of the original unit will be considered by the examiner as difficult to lead, good at talking behind people's backs and poor sense of cooperation. In this way, you may not escape the fate of being "brushed". (3) Avoid narcissism and indifference. Some candidates are usually withdrawn, cold and heavy-hearted, and bring this character into the interview room. During the interview, the expression was indifferent, and he could not actively cooperate with the examiner, lacking the necessary enthusiasm and intimacy. I'm afraid the leaders of all employers hope that their employees can live in harmony, be kind to others, unite and help each other in their work, and make people feel relaxed and happy, which can improve work efficiency. Even if candidates usually withdraw, they should be overcome during the examination, otherwise the atmosphere will be dull and the question and answer will be mechanical, otherwise it will be difficult to hope to be elected. Success belongs to those who are prepared, and the interview needs careful preparation to stand out in the interview. The civil service interview is about to begin. I hope that the candidates who are preparing for the exam can review carefully and make a review plan. Finally, I wish everyone can go smoothly to their ideal jobs.