20 12 On August 2nd, GPHL held a press conference, saying that the "mysterious contract" previously announced by Jiaduobao was suspected of being forged, and they had reported the case to the public security organ. In this regard, Jia Duobao pointed out that Guangyao once admitted its existence, and there were different opinions before and after. At the same time of the public opinion war, both sides said yesterday that the industrial and commercial departments had investigated each other's products.
12,16 On the morning of July 2, GPHL announced that the arbitration application filed by Hongdao Group in May 20 12 against the previous award had been rejected by the court, and the announcement called it the final award.
20 12 On June 28th, GPHL Wang Laoji held a signing ceremony for strategic cooperation between production and supply, and announced that 30 enterprises including Uni-President Yinlu Wellcome had officially signed contracts with GPHL to work for Wang Laoji. These more than 30 enterprises are involved in food production, raw materials and packaging materials supply, covering the entire production and processing chain of Wang Laoji. [8]
On June 2, 2065438, KLOC-0, Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court questioned both parties. On June 20th, Hongdao Group received a notice from Guangzhou People's Procuratorate that the Chen Hongdao case was dismissed. That is, Chen Hongdao's bribery is not established, which may also mean that the two supplementary agreements between Hongdao Group and GPHL should not be deemed invalid.
201June 18, Guangzhou state-owned assets supervision and administration commission (SASAC) responded to the media about the trademark case of Wang Lao Ji, saying that GPHL legally owns the intangible assets of Wang Lao Ji's trademark, and Guangzhou SASAC supported GPHL to recover the production and management rights of Wang Lao Ji's red cans and bottles according to law and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of state-owned assets according to law. [ 10]
On may 27th, 20 12, jiaduobao applied to Beijing No.1 intermediate people's court to cancel the previous arbitration award, and filed a case. On May 28th, GPHL (hereinafter referred to as "GPHL") immediately responded that Jiaduobao was "ignorant of the law" and was prepared to file a claim of 7.5 billion yuan for the illegal infringement income of Jiaduobao in the previous two years.
20 12 on may 27th, jiaduobao claimed that it was not satisfied with the previous award of China international economic and trade arbitration commission and applied to the court to cancel the above award.
20 12 on may 25th, GPHL issued a "solemn statement", claiming that jiaduobao was still selling "Wang Lao Ji in a red jar" in the market, which constituted infringement. [ 13]