Comparison of centralized policies between Song Taizu and Ming Taizu: The comparison of centralized policies between Song Taizu and Ming Taizu is 1. Song Taizu, the prime minister, divided the power of the prime minister. The three departments were in charge of administration, military and finance respectively, but they were not subordinate to each other. The emperor monopolized the power, which greatly weakened the power of the prime minister. 1. Hongwu 13 The Prime Minister rebelled against Hu, and ordered the abolition of Zhongshu Province, with six departments in charge of state affairs, which were directly under the jurisdiction of the emperor and strengthened the power of the monarch. -there are counties under the road, and the central government sends literati to take charge of local military and political financial power, which is adjusted every three years. Locals are not allowed to be officials in the county. He also set up the post of "chief judge", countersigned local decrees, and directly reported the gains and losses of local bureaucrats to the emperor. 2. Ming Taizu's local administration was restored to feudalism, and 25 children and grandchildren were successively enfeoffed in various military locations to prevent rebellion; The whole country is divided into 13 departments to undertake propaganda and deployment, and each department is divided into three departments, the latter is in charge of finance and civil affairs, the latter is in charge of criminal law, and the latter is in charge of military affairs, separation of powers and zhili central government, so as to consolidate the monarchy. In addition, judges were set up in various places to report the gains and losses of local bureaucrats, so that both inside and outside were under the control of the monarch. 3. In terms of supervision, Ming Taizu has more means of supervision than Song Taizu. The central government set up Duchayuan to supervise officials and sent another supervisor to inspect places. There is also a royal guard who spies on the privacy of his subjects. -Take the literati in charge of the soldiers and implement the law of multi-defense, so as to avoid the arrogance of generals and soldiers. 4. On the military side, Ming Taizu is jointly responsible for military affairs with the military departments and war departments of the five armies. The governor's office of the Fifth Army is responsible for unifying the troops, but it has no right to mobilize them. The Ministry of War is responsible for the selection of officers and the training of foot soldiers, but it has no right to command the army. During the war, the emperor ordered soldiers to go out and return to Korea after the war in case the general supported them. -Give more preferential treatment to the founding heroes, and kill less. 5. Centralization means wantonly killing heroes, among which Hu case and Aquamarine case are the most widespread and extremely cruel; It also stipulates that ministers must kneel before the court and abuse the scepter to strengthen the monarchy. A supplementary comparison between Song Taizu and Ming Taizu in implementing centralized policies. The Doctrine of the Mean means that Song Taizu recovered the military power of heroes such as Shi Shouxin, Gao Huaide and Wang Shenqi between drinking and drinking. 1. Cruelty refers to killing heroes in major events, such as the Hu case, involving more than 30,000 people and using cruel means. -.2. Humiliating Minister Ming Taizu to improve the monarchy by humiliating the Minister by kneeling, beating and swearing; He also established a literary inquisition to suppress literati. Which monarch governs better, Song Taizu or Ming Taizu? Try to explain. A: Ming Taizu, who thinks Ming Taizu is better, used the slogan of "expelling Land Rover and restoring China" to call on * * * to drive the Mongols back to Mobei. Later, he sent generals to pacify the remnants of various places and formally unify the country. In addition, Mao was born in poverty and knew the sufferings of the people. Therefore, after the reunification of the country, he rewarded reclamation, water conservancy and agricultural production. He is also a bureaucrat who rectifies order, severely punishes corruption, and has an enlightened and prudent criminal law. Thanks to his efforts, a stable situation soon appeared in the whole country. Therefore, although Taizu took various measures to centralize power in order to consolidate his hard-won country, his achievements are undeniable. On the other hand, the centralization of power in Song Taizu directly caused the weakness of the Song Dynasty, which made the national strength of the Song Dynasty weak and was often invaded by foreign countries. Supplement: Ming Taizu can achieve the goal of centralized monarchy. Song Taizu's national policy of "strengthening cadres and weakening branches" is regarded as centralization, while Ming Taizu is even worse. In order to consolidate the power of the monarch, agents such as the Royal Guards were set up to monitor people's feelings.

Personally, I think this is also the reason for the early death of the diligent monarch in the Ming Dynasty, based on the excessive power of the monarch.

There are also many problems.

For example, there is a cloud eunuch rebellion: the Ming Dynasty was finally killed by eunuchs. I think it should be controlled by a centralized monarch. Any policy should be tailored to the times and have its own interests.

The dynasty didn't last long, for example, there was a warlord regime in the Han Dynasty.

Foreign oppression in Song Dynasty 2009-04-2818: 54:17 Supplement: Provide supplementary information for your reference. * * */w/index？ Title =% E6% 98% 8e% E6% 9c% 9d& variant = zh-# .e6.94.bf.e6.b2.bb.e5.ba.a62009-04-2919:

Are you serious about copying my words? Such behavior is shameful. 2009-05-0113: 23: 20 supplement: ngchunho 123 (fifth grade) 2009-04-27 21:31:39 supplement:

It is shameful to let others copy what you wrote.

Review by yourself! 2009-05-013: 24: 38 Supplement: He also called me shameless.

You are shameless! 2009-05-013: 28: 54 Supplement: You also copied the teacher's explanation: "Your class only knows how to copy people's thinking, which is really a shame for China and Hongkong. If you become the best answer, I have nothing to say, but the questioner will never get a really good answer. " Here it is!

Reference: I

Respondent: ngchunho 123 (Grade 5) 2009-04-28 19:09:37 Supplementary

Respondent: ngchunho 123 (Grade 5) 2009-04-28 19:09:37 Supplementary

00 1 you idiot? You don't know how to answer people's wild frames with your brain? Do you like copying others? Dying, loser

Ming Taizu can better achieve the goal of centralized monarchy. Song Taizu's national policy of strengthening cadres and supporting the weak is considered as centralization, while Ming Taizu is even worse. In order to consolidate the power of the monarch, agents such as the Royal Guards were set up to monitor people's feelings. Because the monarch has too much power,

Personally, I think this is also the reason for the early death of the diligent monarch in the Ming Dynasty, based on the excessive power of the monarch.

There are also many problems.

For example, there is a cloud eunuch rebellion: the Ming Dynasty was finally killed by eunuchs. I think it should be controlled by a centralized monarch. Any policy should be tailored to the times and have its own interests.

The dynasty didn't last long, for example, there was a warlord regime in the Han Dynasty.

There was foreign oppression in the Song Dynasty (above is my humble opinion). Another information is provided for your reference. * * */w/index？ Title =% E6% 98% 8e% E6% 9c% 9d& variant = zh-# .e6.94.bf.e6.b2.bb.e5.ba.a62009-04-2721:.

Are you serious about copying my words? Such behavior is shameful. 2009-04-29 20:00:24 Supplement: kusiu288 Since you are so shameless, I have nothing to say. Just look at the answer time.

You will know who copied your land. Class only knows how to copy people's thinking and crystallization. This is a disgrace to China and Hongkong. If your land is the best answer, I have nothing to say It's just that the questioner never gets a really good answer. Be careful. 2009-05-02 1 3: 25:12 supplement: kusiu288 (primary school level1) was a sinner from the beginning.

It is shameful to let others copy what you wrote.

Review by yourself! I offended d, so you know copywriting? How many ravings do you copy from others? Zhong wants me to reflect on myself? What's your reason? I feel guilty because you copied my wild self. D guilty according to the right path. What about you? D is barking at a dog. 2009-05-02 13:26:06 supplement: kusiu288 (primary school level 1) also called me shameless.

You are shameless! I am ashamed of what you said. What's your argument? Please shut up, 2009-05-02 13:28:30 Supplement: kusiu288 (primary school level 1) You also copied the teacher's explanation, "Your class only knows how to copy people's thinking and crystallization, which is really a shame for China and Hongkong. If you become the best answer, I have nothing to say, but the questioner will never get a really good answer. " Your teacher taught you 1+ 1=2, so you can't say 1+ 1=2? Hey, where is your teacher? Zhong You

After listening to the teacher's explanation, I will analyze it myself. What about you?

Direct replication

If you wrote it yourself, why didn't you give it back to me? Give it back to me if you don't understand, and I'll give it back to you. "Your class only knows people who plagiarize people's thinking and crystallization. This is a disgrace to China and Hongkong. If you become the best answer, I have nothing to say, but the questioner will never get a really good answer. " 2009-05-0213: 31:39 Supplement: I think you should update yourself besides your own information.

I'll wait for you, Li 2009-05-02 13:44:43 Supplement: I want to tell you that you have violated section 2.6 of Zuoyahu knowledge by repeatedly posting the same words "Forwarding questions or answers posted by other netizens", and I will report you accordingly.

Reference: teacher's explanation+self-reasoning in class

Self-evident truth