QS ranking depends on the questionnaire survey of employers in enterprises and institutions, which is greatly influenced by human factors and is also the most unreliable ranking among several overseas rankings.

The reason why it is the most unreliable is because there are several examples. In version 20 10, HKUST ranks 97th in the world, second only to Peking University in mainland China, but ranks 2065 438+065 438+097 in the world. In just one year, the ranking dropped by 100. Who will believe it if you say it? The most fatal flaw of QS,

1) Universities in Commonwealth countries and regions are generally unrealistically high;

2) The ranking of many institutions is extremely unstable, as evidenced by the ranking of China University of Science and Technology.

3) The ranking of colleges and universities in the same continent will be seriously inconsistent with the world ranking;

3) The criteria and parameters on which the ranking is based are never made public, saying that the questionnaire survey involves personal privacy and cannot be published is just an excuse to cover up its blind ranking;

If you turn a blind eye to the above, there is no way out. At least when I was studying abroad, I mentioned QS to other teachers and classmates, and others said it was a joke.