1, if the undergraduate major is accounting, you can temporarily not include the professional courses in the review category, because there are still several months of interview time after the initial test. If the basic skills are solid, this period of time should be said to be relatively abundant to deal with professional courses;

2. The initial test is 199. The former includes mathematics (75), logic (60) and Chinese writing (65), with a total score of 200, while the latter is 100. Personally, I think that comprehensive mathematics and logic are the key, and the number of questions in the joint exam is large and the time is tight. In order to get a high score, mathematics needs an average of 1.5 minutes to solve a problem, while logic needs to summarize a lot of problem-solving skills for similar problems. As for writing, everyone is at the same level. Writing two articles in 50-60 minutes will not be much better. As long as the validity analysis of the argument is not off topic, the score will not be too much. English is not much to say, reading is king, and if you win reading, you can get high marks. (More than 60 points in mathematics, about 50 points in necessary logic, more than 45 points in writing, and more than 65-70 points in English)

3. The review of specialized courses varies from person to person, and there is nothing particularly worth recommending; Cai Yang's re-examination questions are in the postgraduate forum, so you can go and have a look.

4, this also depends on your public relations focus. If you have a good foundation in professional courses and good English, you can consider CPA first, and then enter mpacc for preparation in the middle of 10;

5. Cai Yang has a strong accounting ability and has long-term exchanges and cooperation with ACCA, the Australian Institute of Accountants and other institutions. There should be an opportunity to go abroad, and the specific situation can be directly consulted by telephone.