Before the interview, I only received the interview notice, and only when I arrived at the traditional Chinese medicine hospital did I find that I had to carry out the practical skills assessment (this part of the assessment was conducted in other provinces and cities or big hospitals after the interview was accepted). The interview only accounted for 20 points, and the practical skills were 80 points. Of course, evaluation is nothing. I heard that for the so-called merit-based admission, (Khan, recruited more than 100 people, only went to dozens, but did not recruit enough people to put on airs, ridiculous bureaucratic expressionism. . . )
Children's shoes should be tested. Since they all went, it turned out that there was a practical skill test on the spot in addition to the interviewer who reported to the hospital (of course, the interviewer had good professional quality and nothing to criticize). There is nothing wrong with the exam, so just take it. Everyone has a medical practitioner who can pass the national examination. What is there to be afraid of?
The problem is that the examiners who practice skills are all Chinese medicine hospitals, and the candidates criticize a lot. The skills test organized is divided into cardiopulmonary resuscitation and physical examination. In the narrow space of Chinese medicine hospital, children's shoes saw that the examiner's scene was very chaotic, and obviously they didn't know how to take the exam. It's probably my first time as an examiner. I'm flattered. Children's shoes even heard examiners ask each other before the exam to confirm how CPR was done, and what was the ratio of chest compressions to artificial respiration. Basic medical knowledge such as how to do heart examination (I also know that Chinese medicine and western medicine systems are different, and the examination procedures of practicing doctors are different, and they are not professional across the mountain), plus these people (it is estimated that few people have master's degrees) envy master's degrees, and children's shoes are not good. As expected, the examiners are serious and professional, and obviously feel at a loss than the candidates. After the exam, the candidates who took the exam all responded to the poor quality of the examiner and worried about affecting their grades. Sure enough, after the results of the on-site examination came out, many candidates who have been engaged in clinical work for 5 or 6 years actually scored dozens of points lower than the fresh graduates of basic majors, and many candidates scored less than half of the total score, which made people feel ridiculous. No wonder no one applied for this so-called urgently needed talent recruitment. More ironically, several children's shoes that took the much-needed talent test were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital and edited because of their high interview scores.