The practice of your college is not appropriate. My previous university never ranked scholarships, but only announced them when students were controversial. That is to say, in order to be fair, when students' right to know conflicts with their privacy, students will voluntarily give up their right to know to announce their grades.

Of course, because there are no corresponding laws, regulations and precedents in China to refer to whether students' grades constitute the right to privacy, the scope of the right to privacy is not the same in different countries, and the court judge decides the scope of the right to privacy according to the free evaluation of evidence. Different people in the same country have different privacy rights.

For example, the privacy rights of public figures and government officials must be transferred to the public, which is a common saying recognized by the common law system and the civil law system. If any newspaper in the United States has the right to publish the scandals and private lives of the President of the United States or a popular American star, you will never see any newspaper publish the private lives and gossip of ordinary citizens, because the privacy of the former has been partially transferred to the public by law, while the latter cannot be transferred. Therefore, even citizens of the same country have different privacy rights.

I am sure that after you graduate, no individual or unit can publish your report card. However, it is controversial whether students should be forced to give up the privacy of their transcripts at school.

In addition, even if it constitutes infringement, this kind of infringement is obviously slight, generally impossible and has no litigation value. At most, you will get the legal consequences of apologizing and stopping the infringement in court. Therefore, this kind of infringement only stays in legal infringement.