In fact, after 1986, South Korea has been making explanations to distinguish between Korean medicine and Chinese medicine. Gao Bingxi, dean of the Institute of International Relations Education of Han Guoqing Hee Medical University, believes that "Four Elephant Medicine" is a unique theoretical system in Korea, which pays attention to the personality of human body in behavior, physiological characteristics and adaptability.

But these views are far-fetched to China scholars, which is also a misunderstanding of historical classics. Fu Yanling, director of the international exchange and cooperation department of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and doctoral supervisor, said that there is no essential difference between the "four images" theory of traditional Chinese medicine and the "yin-yang and five elements" theory. "Four elephants medicine does not represent Korean medicine, it is just a well-known academic. At the same time, the four images themselves are a concept in China's ancient natural philosophy, which originated from Zhouyi. This kind of learning only combines diseases with people's physique and makes a diagnosis accordingly.

When interviewed by the Morning Post reporter, many experts in the field of traditional Chinese medicine in China still gave tolerant comments on the success of the application for the legacy of Treasure of Oriental Medicine, and thought that this work of traditional Chinese medicine had certain positive significance for the development of traditional Chinese medicine-it did not conflict with the application for the legacy of classic Chinese medicine. But the question is, do Koreans think this is a book of Chinese medicine? It is not difficult to see their attitude from South Korea's propaganda and holding the "International Korean Medical Expo" in cooperation with the 400th anniversary of the publication of Oriental Medical Treasures.