1. Responsibility ability: refers to the actor's ability to identify and control his own behavior. The criminal law does not directly stipulate that the establishment of a crime requires the actor to have the ability of responsibility, but passively stipulates the ability of no responsibility and the ability of limiting responsibility.

2. Cause freedom behavior: that is, the actor can freely decide whether he is in a state of no responsibility. As long as the actor has the ability to be responsible, intentional or negligent, there is the possibility of criticism and responsibility should be investigated.

3. The principle of coexistence of responsibility ability and behavior: the actor has responsibility ability and intention and negligence at the beginning of the act, and then loses responsibility ability. In the stage of irresponsibility, he committed another kind of behavior, which led to the result. Then the actor only bears the responsibility of attempted crime for the previous behavior.

4. Expectation possibility: It means that it is possible to expect the actor to commit other legal acts without committing illegal acts according to the specific circumstances.

5. There is no possibility of expectation: if the actor cannot be expected to perform a legal act, that is, the law has no possibility of expectation for the actor, it will not be criminally responsible. Expecting possibility is the embodiment of normative responsibility theory.

6. Understanding of illegality: refers to the understanding that one's actions violate the criminal law, that is, the formal understanding of criminal illegality.

7. Misunderstanding of illegality: refers to the actor's awareness of the constitutive requirements, but he doesn't know that his behavior is prohibited by law.

8. Direct prohibition error: refers to the misunderstanding of prohibition norms, that is, the situation where illegal acts are wrongly implemented as legal acts.

9. Indirect prohibitive error: It means that although the actor recognizes that the act is prohibited by law, he mistakenly believes that there are legitimate norms in his specific case, so he is not illegal, that is, the actor mistakenly establishes a non-existent legitimate basis for his illegal behavior.

10. Hint error: refers to the situation of misinterpreting the elements of the constitutive requirements and mistaking one's behavior for not meeting the elements of the constitutive requirements. The main reason is the misunderstanding in the process of derivation, that is, whether the facts of the case conform to the legal provisions. This is an error in the application of the law and does not affect the establishment of intention or crime. Because this kind of mistake is the actor's own misunderstanding of the concept of constitutive requirements.

1 1. Validity error: refers to the situation that the actor knows the prohibited norm, but mistakenly thinks that the norm is invalid.