Lin Huaqi

(against each other)

We think that loose management does more harm than good to college students.

Sticking to loose management is not equal to humanized management.

The universal idea of modern university management is humanized management. People-oriented is the requirement of management, and the all-round development of people is the goal of management.

We believe that loose management is not a very humanized management method, nor can it achieve the educational goals of our university well.

-reason: [humanized management] refers to the management that attaches importance to the existence of human nature as a person. On the premise of respecting human nature, we should guide and shape behavior, manage by habit, pay attention to people's creativity and promote development by innovation. Humanized management is not only limited to respecting human nature, but also emphasizes giving full play to people's subjective initiative and management functions, promoting people's all-round development on the track of human nature and focusing on stimulating people's creativity. We believe that loose management is easy to let people drift freely and make people disobey the basic rules of society, thus causing social anomie and social disorder, which is not conducive to building a harmonious society. -

The definition and feature of loose management is defect analysis.

The word "tube" in management means jurisdiction and supervisor, and it talks about the affiliation of posts, the structure of power and the boundary of responsibilities; The word "reason" in management means governance, handling and conditioning, that is, order, proper methods and obvious benefits.

The loose management we are debating now is a management model with less control and more freedom, which allows managers and managed people to consciously act according to their wishes at that time in order to achieve organizational goals. Its characteristic is that in all aspects of management, the management plan is rather general, the implementation of norms is very arbitrary, and the managed person can not be effectively controlled, mainly relying on the full consciousness of the managed person to coordinate contradictions.

In our opinion, this kind of management is very unstable. On the other hand, this kind of management does not give full play to its management function, which makes the management operation inefficient and wastes social resources.

Combined with actual demonstration

We believe that modern universities should provide college students with a lot of free development space and a better creative environment. Our Wuhan University is recognized by the world in this respect. However, what we need is not loose management. Not only will it not give us more freedom and creative space, but it will probably destroy our original good order and campus atmosphere.

-Campus examples, such as

On the problem of teachers and students attending classes on time;

Teachers attend classes on time and students attend classes on time, which is a normal teaching order. Each of our teachers and students should strictly abide by it, so as to ensure the teaching quality of our university and maintain a good learning atmosphere. If the teacher doesn't give lessons to the students on time under the condition of loose management, I am very tired and got up late today. Sorry, I'm half an hour late for class. Let's study by ourselves first! In this way, will our students feel comfortable? Will we still have a good enthusiasm for learning? We all come to school with our parents' hard-earned money and deserve high-quality education services. On the other hand, because of the loose management, we students come to class as long as they are in a good mood, and gossip freely in class, and cell phone rings come and go. Can we college students still study in such an environment?

We need strong management! We need more humanized management to reduce the troubles caused by lazy factors in human nature to our study and life.

Our management can be moderately flexible and respect the reasonable needs of people.

For example:

If you can't attend class due to insufficient facts, you can ask for leave under the premise of strict procedures.

The teacher must not be late for class for more than 5 minutes or 10 minutes, otherwise it will constitute a teaching accident.

Classroom discipline must be good. Under normal class order, teachers respect students' freedom and students respect teachers' hard work.

Any group or organization needs certain rules to maintain its internal good order. Our university is also a small society. There are many rules and procedures that need to be strictly observed. Only in this way can the educational mission and management function of our university be well realized. Every school environment has its own rules of the game. The library must not be noisy, disheveled or bring other books in. There must be no noise in the teaching area, which will not affect others' study. Observe the normal work and rest time of the living area, and do not affect the normal rest of others. Abide by all kinds of complicated operating specifications of the laboratory and obey the management of the administrator. ...

Our study needs a good order, and our creation also needs to be carried out under certain norms. Strictly observing the rules of the game will not affect our college students' free creation, but it is an indispensable condition. ————

"three noes" of loose management

What is the mission of our university?

Universities have three missions: personnel training, scientific research and serving the society.

Talents need to be cultivated, the study of scientific theory is a kind of cultivation, the cultivation of humanistic quality is also a kind of cultivation, and social roles are also cultivated. Loose management is too "inaction" in actively cultivating high-quality talents and shaping college students' independent personality.

The spirit of scientific research is rigorous, and anything so-so is unacceptable. However, loose management is very easy for us college students to breed lax study and research habits, which is so "ineffective".

Most of our college students want to go out into the society and build the country in various social posts. Only those high-quality talents with college education can be competent for our college students' future social roles. For this kind of social expectation, loose management is too "powerless".

Attention! !

In the debate, we must firmly grasp the shortcomings of loose management, and find theories and examples to explain it is even more harmful! What is the theoretical violation and practical harm of this management method to the development of our college students?

The purpose of management is not to stifle the nature and freedom of college students, but to create a better learning environment. Try to refute the accusation that the other side imposed on us to stifle the free development of students' nature and personality! ! We have our own better management ideas and methods: see (broken)!

Rest and stand.

Conclusion: We insist that there are too many serious disadvantages in loose management, and the disadvantages outweigh the advantages for our college students.

We think there is a better management method than loose management. It should be more humane, moderate and service-oriented management, not too loose but moderately strict, not regardless, but service-oriented management. It should provide our college students with a better study and living environment and campus order, as well as a more tolerant and free academic environment.

Refute the other party's possible views.

First, the problem of humanized management.

(It has been argued before that continuous management is not necessarily humanized, and human nature has many weaknesses that need to be guided and corrected. You can prepare some examples from life. )

Second, a harmonious society can be achieved not by loose management, but by various subjective efforts. Harmonious society is an orderly and people-oriented social state, not a loose management with anarchism tendency.

Third, about the growth of genius: (ethical debate)

It is certainly a good thing for talented college students with strong self-control, intelligence and ability to implement loose management. Too much management may hurt their creative mood. However, most college students are not geniuses, and their self-control is generally weak and dependent. They need reasonable guidance and training.

If we treat many ordinary college students with genius management, it will lead to a vicious circle of "the stronger the strong, the weaker the weak", which is not in line with the basic ethical norms of "protecting the vulnerable groups" in civilized society. The goal of a university is to train ordinary college students into outstanding talents who can serve the society. Our university can't give up the management of most ordinary college students for a few talents.

In addition, genius also needs a harmonious and stable environment.

Of course, there should be some exceptions in our management. We can't stifle the creativity of geniuses, we should give them some special free space. Let them create more miracles for mankind in a more unrestrained environment. But these exceptions cannot be extended to ordinary college students, so we insist that the disadvantages of loose management in universities outweigh the advantages.

Statement on the mission of the university

1930, Ortega, professor of philosophy at the University of Madrid, Spain? Gasser (1883— 1955) published The Mission of the University in view of the social development and university education at that time.

He clearly pointed out that an important mission of universities is to cultivate ordinary people into excellent doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, judges, economic managers, civil servants, middle school science and humanities teachers by using the most economical, direct and effective methods invented by human wisdom. " 1

In Ortega's view of university mission, universities are duty-bound to undertake the important task of educating ordinary people to become cultural people. He proposed that universities should step out of the "ivory tower" and undertake the mission of opening doors, going to society, serving the public and promoting social development, which has important theoretical and practical significance.