Eight High Score Strategies in Interview
First, examine the questions carefully.
In the face of examination questions, we should carefully read every word in the questions, grasp the key words, think calmly, examine which aspects of our own quality and ability are important, accurately grasp the proposer's intention to write the questions, and make a good draft according to the usual training. If possible, we should make full use of the draft paper provided by the examination room, simply list the outline of the answer, quickly introduce it from familiar fields, calmly organize the answers, and then speak it in an orderly and logical way in accurate and concise language. In recent years, many exams have adopted a mixed method of two types of questions. For example, what would you do if the leader asked you to travel with a comrade who was in conflict with you? Many candidates only regard this issue as an interpersonal problem when dealing with it.
Second, combining theoretical analysis with examples.
Every candidate wants to show his most perfect and authentic side to the examiner, and such questions are particularly taboo. Generally, he emphasizes how strong his plan is, which is not only boastful, but also unconvincing. At this time, if we can properly quote examples from life, we can get twice the result with half the effort. Even problems that can be proved in theory, if supported by practical arguments, can make their views more rigorous and impeccable.
Candidates with work experience can be said to have organized a travel activity during their work. When talking about organizing activities, they must talk about the success of the activity organization and its good influence among colleagues. Candidates who have no work experience can be said to have organized college students' art festivals, calligraphy competitions and singing competitions. When it comes to organizing activities, the most important thing is to talk about whether the activities are successful, whether they have received the expected results, and how the students have responded.
In the process of answering questions in an interview, it is very important to speak with facts and data. Of course, the enumeration of such examples is not limited to the matching degree between job hunting motivation and the proposed position. For other problems, such as comprehensive analysis, planning, organization and coordination, we can quote classic examples from life. This will not only enrich the content of our answers, polish our answering process, but also receive unexpected results. However, don't lie, it is easy to be seen by the examiner. Therefore, in the usual training process, we must strengthen the cultivation and improvement of this aspect of thinking ability.
Third, pay attention to personalization.
Interview questions are open-ended and there are no standard answers. It is unnecessary for many candidates to pursue "standard answers" when preparing for the exam. If everyone speaks the same word, the examiner is bound to be aesthetically tired, which is not conducive to selecting talents. When answering questions, candidates should make the questions concrete and life-oriented, and strive to create bright spots. Candidates need to remember that the test questions are alive, and only by integrating their own thoughts, personal cognition, examples and experiences with the test questions can the test questions be vividly and stereoscopically presented.
As far as traits are concerned, strong boys must show strength and stability; If you are timid and introverted, you can exert your emotional integrity; Girls with ability and strong professional color should return to frankness; If you are not mature and shy, you should give people an impression of exquisiteness and practicality. As far as experience is concerned, those with work experience can contact actual work experience and fully answer questions; Fresh graduates can talk about it from the perspective of understanding. There is no specific answer mode. Candidates should make up for their own shortcomings as much as possible while giving full play to their personal advantages.
Fourth, language usually emphasizes sincerity and seeking truth from facts.
When answering the interviewer's questions, many candidates tend to be clever, use too much embellishment in their answers, and pay little attention to honest, rigorous thinking and objective answers, which are often unable to justify themselves. In the interview, it is a common practice to skillfully hide the real needs of job seekers behind the interview questions. At this time, if you just cater to it, you will soon be out. Seeking truth from facts means that in the interview, when answering the examiner's questions, candidates should proceed from their own actual situation, completely get rid of insincere empty talk, big talk and lies, fully explore and combine their own life experiences, and fully show their true glory to the examiner. Even in the face of your own mistakes, you should be brave enough to admit it, and never show off your interview skills to fool the examiner. The interview response is not acting, nor is it a speech contest. Candidates should clearly understand that the interview examines the candidates' true views, opinions and levels. Therefore, candidates should adhere to their own quality and principles when answering, and strive to be sincere and tell the truth.
Fifth, it is well founded.
Civil servant interview questions focus on critical thinking ability, so there is generally no standard answer. Two typical interview questions are: "What is your greatest strength" and "What is your greatest weakness". Such a question seems simple, but it is actually difficult to answer. Candidates can easily fall into an embarrassing situation where they can't continue to answer. The key to solve this problem is to be able to justify itself, that is, to stick to the topic, find an angle as the starting point and explain it in a logical way. This can add highlights to your answers and increase your chances of getting high marks.
Sixth, the position is clear and not extreme.
Civil servants serve the public. We should look at things and deal with problems from the people's interests and stand on the people's side. Therefore, candidates who take part in civil servant interviews should analyze problems from the perspective of civil servants, not only from the interests of individuals or a small group, but also pay attention to balancing various relationships. If candidates don't know much about the civil service industry, the best way is to pay more attention to national affairs and social hot issues; If you have no practical work experience, you should pay attention to collecting information related to the position you are applying for, try to think about how to carry out a specific job, and practice writing some official documents such as investigation, research, handling problems and formulating strategies to accumulate relevant knowledge and experience.
Seven, rational analysis of emotional expression
Interview is not only a test of ability, but also a form of examination. In previous interviews, the relationship between examiners and candidates was mainly mechanical question and answer. Examiners are like answering machines, and candidates are like answering machines. The interview between the two sides adopted a mechanical question-and-answer method, which obviously failed to select the most real talents. But the actual situation now is that the interview of civil servants in our country has begun to return to the essence of the interview-"seeing the real person, seeing the true feelings, solving the true feelings, and choosing the true talents"-which requires candidates to communicate with the examiner with true feelings and transform themselves from the answering machine into a person with flesh and blood, soul and feelings, thus arousing the emotions of the examiner and finally passing the interview. Therefore, candidates should tap the true highlights of their own lives, identify with the civil service profession from the deep heart, establish a sense of service, responsibility and kindness from the deep heart, express their views in plain life language, and impress examiners with true feelings.
Eight, the correct performance of qualifications
In the civil service examination, generally speaking, all departments will put forward some basic conditions for the positions they want to recruit before recruitment, and candidates should fully show their advantages in the interview according to these conditions. But we should pay attention to:
1. Targeted. Applicants need to be fully prepared before the interview to understand the nature of the position they are applying for and the characteristics of the talents they need. When you answer, you should describe yourself selectively and promote yourself for different departments or different jobs in the same department. Be sure not to be limited to a certain mindset, but to analyze specific problems and highlight yourself with goals and objects.
2. Refuse to be grandiose. In the process of expounding oneself, it can be properly beautified. This is a strategy, but we should avoid overdoing it, otherwise, we will often put ourselves in an embarrassing situation.
Step 3 focus. When describing your own advantages, you should highlight the key points, especially your own unique advantages. There is a simple reason. The focus is on your characteristics, which is your advantage. Being too comprehensive means these may be your weaknesses.
4. Clever avoidance. Everyone has advantages and disadvantages, some of which are harmless and some may seriously affect the success of the interview, so you should correct your shortcomings in the interview and don't be too outspoken. For the short board, it should be properly packaged before it is launched, and the short board should be turned into an advantage as much as possible. After all, introducing yourself to others is selling yourself to others. In the competitive mode, good sales skills are extremely important for success.