My concluding remarks recorded our footprints and friendship. ..
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Hello, everyone. The other party is friendly!
The previous debate was very intense and wonderful, and the performance of the opposing debater was amazing. However, for such a topic, we must first solve the following three conceptual problems.
1. University and university education are different concepts and should be strictly distinguished. University is the place of university education, which is static. On the other hand, university education is a process and dynamic. If we confuse the two, it will introduce market rules into all aspects of the university field, lead to the industrialization of education, and then produce various disadvantages, which is not our view.
2. What is a market? The concept of market is very broad, including narrow tangible market and broad intangible market. There are both material markets, spiritual markets and ideological markets. Another debater has repeatedly held a magnifying glass to observe the disadvantages of the market. Admittedly, we don't deny that the market has its own insurmountable defects, but we should also see its advantages: equality, fairness, legality and openness. This is its mainstream! The defects of the market can't be overcome by itself, but people can. The market we are talking about includes state intervention, and we can't ignore the macro-control of the government. With the development of the market and the improvement of relevant laws and regulations, the disadvantages of the market can be overcome. The other party may say that marketization will lead to moral deficiency, then I don't understand. Doesn't the market need honesty? Honesty is not morality? Moreover, market competition leads to the survival of the fittest, and only talents with all-round development in morality, intelligence and physique will have a bright future!
3. direction. Guidance is not a flag, it plays a guiding role rather than leading, and it does not have to rise to a certain height. Isn't the lesson from the past a guiding role?
Having made the above three points clear, let's look at this topic again. Assuming that university education is not market-oriented, first of all, graduates will find it difficult to find jobs, waste their youth and financial resources, and even delay their lives because their knowledge does not meet the market demand. Secondly, for schools, it is difficult for graduates to find jobs, which naturally leads to difficulties in enrolling students. Such a vicious circle will eventually shrink the whole university education, which is accompanied by a large waste of educational resources! Thirdly, from the perspective of the whole society, the difficulty of students' employment not only causes a lot of waste of resources, but also breeds social contradictions, which is incompatible with our construction of a harmonious society! How does the opposing debater solve this problem? In today's society, market economy has become the dominant mode of the world economy. As an organic part of social economy, university education is of course regulated by the market. Marxist philosophy holds that to solve problems and do things, we must proceed from reality, that is, everything depends on time, place and conditions. What is the reality now? Now we are in a market environment. Starting from this reality, the marketization of university education is an irresistible historical trend! It is the requirement of the times!
Finally, I want to clarify that orientation is not exclusive. How can I put it? We have repeatedly emphasized market orientation, but we have not said that the market is the only orientation of university education, just as our struggle against capitalism does not hinder us from building a harmonious society! Moreover, it should be noted that market orientation and other orientations of university education are mutually reinforcing. Since the market is beneficial to all aspects, why not take it as the orientation of university education? Hello, everyone. How nice!
To sum up, we analyze that university education should be market-oriented from three aspects: concept, feasibility and positive significance. We further demonstrate our views from the perspective of the times and the relationship between market orientation and other orientations of university education. So we insist that university education should be market-oriented! There is no best, only better. University education is market-oriented. How nice!
My speech is over, thank you.