The teacher confiscated the mobile phone and gave it directly to the parents of the students. In this case, the teacher takes action on the basis of managing the students. Although the confiscation of the mobile phone temporarily deprived the owner of the right to possess and dispose of the property, because the teacher gave the mobile phone to the owner's parents, and the owner had a very close relationship with his parents, he did not think that this actually violated the owner's ownership, so it was not illegal to give it to his parents after confiscation. Returning the mobile phone within a certain period of time after confiscation is the most commonly used means for teachers. Generally speaking, it means to return it after the exam. However, if the return period is too long, or the owner insists on not agreeing, the teacher still occupies the mobile phone, which may constitute an infringement on the owner's right to possess and dispose of it. If the teacher insists on not returning it to the owner, he can choose to contact the parents and give it to them. The teacher confiscated the mobile phone and refused to return it. If this happens, the teacher's behavior has actually violated the owner's right to possess and dispose of it. If the teacher refuses to return it, the owner can claim his legitimate rights and interests through law.

legal ground

Article 237 of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) causes damage to real estate or chattel, and the obligee may request repair, redone, replacement or restitution according to law.