University of Tokyo 100
Kyoto University 100
Tokyo institute of technology 100
(The science and engineering of the above three universities are neck and neck in Japan, each with its own strengths, and it is difficult to win or lose. For example, in chemistry, all three universities have entered the top of the world 10, and Kyoto University ranks first in the world. But in space physics and robotics, the University of Tokyo and tokyo institute of technology are among the best, leading the world in making robots. Not long ago, these two universities also took part in the competition, and tokyo institute of technology won. )
University of Tsukuba 80
(The University of Tsukuba is also one of the top universities in Japan, and the Nobel Prize winner once came from the University of Tsukuba, but in fact, this professor was an associate professor in tokyo institute of technology at first, but he never got a promotion, so he jumped ship and went to the University of Tsukuba. Although the University of Tsukuba ranks higher, science and engineering are not as good as Tokyo University or tokyo institute of technology, and liberal arts are not as good as hitotsubashi university, Japan, but its comprehensive level is not bad, and it is firmly in front of Japan 15).
Peking University
Tsinghua 75
(Tsinghua and Peking University are really miserable in the world rankings, both of which are beyond 200. But personally, Tsinghua Peking University is not inferior to Tokyo University in terms of professional knowledge and flexibility of students' reaction, but why is it so backward in ranking? I think China's teaching is too bookish, ignoring practical ability. Many students from Peking University come to Tokyo University for exchange and study in Tsinghua. It is absolutely not difficult for them to do a problem, but it is a bit difficult to do it in practice. It seems that the use of many devices is not very clear. How to achieve results after doing research but lacking practical operation? The chief culprit of this situation, I think, is that there is more money, and there is not so much money to buy those expensive equipment)
Keio University 50
Waseda University
The scores of these two schools are not excessive. First of all, in Japan, the entrance examination for private universities is watery, unlike national universities, which rely entirely on real swords and guns, so private universities ranked in the world are not allowed to participate in the ranking. But as far as liberal arts are concerned, these two universities are definitely universities that train political talents, because those who can enter these two universities have economic strength and many of them have political backgrounds. The liberal arts in these two schools are still excellent, and they are as good as those in hitotsubashi university, but the science and engineering are really hard to be elegant, and they are not on the same level as those in Tokyo University and other schools. To study abroad, I personally don't think you should come to these two schools, because science and engineering are not dominant, and liberal arts. I think it is quite difficult for China people to stay in Japan as political talents. )
The above is my personal opinion, I hope it will help you.
By the way, the one upstairs is watching clouds by the sea. Please read the landlord's question clearly. The landlord is asking about engineering rankings. How much do you know about Japanese schools? Not all Japanese in Japan are aware of the academic achievements of Japanese universities. Many Japanese think that tokyo institute of technology is a private school, and so do your Japanese colleagues. I don't deny Waseda, but his engineering is really incomparable to other schools. I give 40 points, not that Waseda has only 40 points, but the gap between him and other engineering schools)