Marxist philosophy, which requires four studies in high school, is taught in colleges and universities as an introduction to the basic principles of Marxism. There are many versions, which are generally used by higher education publishing houses. In fact, all versions are similar. The philosophy part is slightly deeper than the high school, and the economic part is much deeper than the high school.

Principles of Marxist Philosophy, edited by Wang, is also one of the teaching materials for non-philosophy majors in colleges and universities, and it is not very difficult. It may be a little more detailed than high school textbooks.

Personally, I don't think it is necessary to watch these things in high school. This is a waste of time. High school textbooks are enough for the college entrance examination. Textbooks in universities are nothing more than those things, which have little meaning. I also liked to watch Marxist philosophy in high school, but I was not happy at all when I went to college. In fact, many things that Ma Zhe said are not completely correct. In Marxist philosophy, Marx's own views are few and far between, and most of them were put forward by the Soviets. Even the concept of "matter" in high school textbooks was not put forward by Marx. Although Marx is one of the most influential philosophers in the post-Rousseau era, many things in his own theory are unreasonable. Marx called himself materialism. Strictly speaking, he fundamentally changed the concepts of materialism and idealism, or he invented them himself. Later generations also criticized him a lot. As for dialectics, Brandt Russell even rudely criticized in the History of Western Philosophy that "all the ingredients that Marx inherited from Hegel are unscientific, or there is no reason to prove that these ingredients are scientific."

When I went to college, I had the opportunity to look at the theories of other philosophers, such as Plato, Hobbes, Rousseau, Kant, Rawls and Nozick. And compare their philosophical views with Marx's.