1. At the beginning of the post-evaluation, it is necessary to clarify the writing purpose and background, such as introducing the basic situation of the open fire safety course, including the course name, speaker, course theme, etc. This basic information can help readers better understand your post-trial background and position.
2. Summarize the main contents and key points of the course, so that readers can have a comprehensive understanding of the course. It should be noted here that the summary should be concise and focused. For example, you can mention the fire protection knowledge, fire prevention skills and emergency measures to deal with fires explained in the course.
3. The next step is to analyze the value and significance of the course. In this part, you need to dig deep into the course content and explain your understanding and evaluation of the course. We can talk about the importance of the course in improving fire safety awareness and mastering emergency evacuation skills, and how to apply what we have learned in daily life.
4. Put forward suggestions and opinions. This part requires you to think and summarize the course and put forward suggestions and opinions for improvement. For example, we can suggest adding more practical cases, strengthening interactive links and improving the practicality and interest of the course.
Matters needing attention in writing feedback:
1, the content should be objective.
When writing comments, try to keep an objective attitude and avoid exaggerating or belittling what you read. We should base our views, feelings and opinions on works on objective facts, and support our views with facts and data. At the same time, we should avoid bringing our own prejudice and subjective feelings into the post-trial, which will affect the fairness of the judgment.
2. The analysis should be in-depth.
When writing a review, you need to analyze and think deeply about what you read, and dig out the connotation and theme of the work. It is necessary to combine the overall content and expression techniques of the work, analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the work, and discuss its highlights and shortcomings in depth. At the same time, we should also pay attention to the logic and organization of analysis to avoid jumping and confusion.
3. Language should be concise and clear.
When writing feedback, you should pay attention to the conciseness and clarity of the language to avoid lengthy and cumbersome situations. We should express our views and feelings in concise and clear language, and pay attention to basic language norms such as accurate words, correct grammar and correct spelling. In addition, some rhetorical devices can be used appropriately to enhance the expressive force of the article, but care should be taken not to be too gorgeous and affect the expression of the content.