I participated in 18 World War II Party, took the 396 Economic Joint Examination, and took the second major 134, with a total score of 383. I was admitted as an applied statistics major in university of international business and economics. In the first annual report, it is easier to pass the entrance examination with a master's degree in mathematics and a political collapse. This paper mainly shares some review experiences of the 396 Joint Entrance Examination.
396. The entrance examination of economics mainly selects the professional master's examinations of many majors, such as finance, applied statistics, international business, taxation and insurance, from many schools (the schools I know in Beijing include foreign trade, people's congress, central finance and economics, capital economy and trade, etc., and many other schools should also have them) to replace the master's and other professional mathematics subjects (generally corresponding to Mathematics III). The overall difficulty is lower than that of Mathematics III, which is an ideal choice for students who are not outstanding in mathematics but want to rush to the target school. Because of the great difficulty of Mathematics 123 in recent two years, students who have mastered Mathematics 3 and Mathematics 396 in the target major also suggest to look at the real problems of Mathematics 3 in recent years in advance and make a balance. The total score is *** 150, which is divided into 70 points for mathematics (choose × 10 2.5 points, 5 points for solving problems ×9 points), 40 points for logic (2 points for 20 single-choice options) and 40 points for writing (2 articles, 600 words each, 20 points each).
Due to the wave of graduation season, systematic review began in September, which is basically the rhythm of doing five breaks and two breaks. . . Later, in order to concentrate as much as possible, I signed up for several classes on weekends, mainly because I thought it was better to attend classes than to lie down. . Because I have graduated, I have no work and no other chores, so the overall efficiency is still relatively high. If I am a freshman and a senior, I'd better start reviewing in advance, and it is more suitable before and after the summer vacation (if there are more books in professional courses, I need to start earlier). If it takes too long, it will easily collapse in the later stage and give up treatment directly.
The following is my personal review experience based on the three parts of the exam.
Mathematics: The content includes advanced mathematics, line generation and probability theory. The difficulty is lower than the high number, and the number of test sites is less than the high number. However, the questions of 17 and 18 have obviously improved in difficulty (in my impression, it is the first time that 17 needs to be classified and discussed, which has never happened before, so many students may not consider it when they are nervous in the examination room), but the difficulty is still higher than that of the high number. Because I learned the number three in the first year, there were not many problems in the knowledge points when I first started reading mathematics, only some of them were forgotten and I learned it again (because 18 didn't read it at all from the end of July to the beginning of September). . )。 Before, a classmate asked me if I wanted to use the textbook "Count Three". Personally, it doesn't make much sense, because the test range of Count 3 is much more than 396. According to the requirements of Count III, although the knowledge level will be higher, there will be a lot of useless work and the process will be more painful. Therefore, it is not recommended to read Count Three unless you have a good foundation or sufficient time. The proposition points of big questions are generally the same every year, and the multiple-choice questions are slightly different every year. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that all test sites are mastered, especially the various problem-solving methods of knowledge points involved in big questions should be skillfully used.
Logic: 20 multiple-choice questions, including formal logic and reasoning. In recent two years, the number of reasoning questions is relatively small. Simply put, there are more difficult questions to understand. There are two main ways for individuals to solve logical problems. One is the "standard" problem-solving methods such as various theories and sentence structures introduced in the tutorial, and the other is to rely on language sense. My experience in this field is that if you do more questions, your sense of language will be much stronger. In this part of my personal experience, I feel that those methods will be difficult to understand by self-study, so I basically do not rely on all kinds of theories mentioned in the book, and basically find my own methods by doing problems. If you want to do the questions according to the methods introduced in the book, it may be better to recommend listening to online classes or face-to-face lectures. It should be noted that as of 18, the original questions of other exams have appeared in the real logic questions over the years. At that time, I collected a lot of 396 exercises on the market and successfully brushed some examination questions, so my mentality of doing old questions in the examination room would be relaxed, so the logic part should ensure the quantity of questions in particular.
Writing: There are always two parts. The first is the analysis of the validity of the argument, and the title will be given to an article. We need to choose four logical loopholes to prove that the argument of this article is problematic. The second composition is similar to the argumentative essay of NMET, but the difference is that in recent years, the theme tends to discuss current affairs and some economic-related issues, which has the characteristics of "economic joint examination". My main practice in this part of the composition is to demonstrate the effectiveness. The core of this part is two points: one is to find logical points, and the other is to analyze. It is suggested to learn the possible types of logical questions first, then practice several times to find logical loopholes (the number of article loopholes in the questions will be much more than four), then write a few articles against the study materials, and finally write them completely out of the study materials according to the examination situation. It will be painful at first, and I will be familiar with it after writing 8- 10. You will speed up your writing slightly in the future, and you will write 65438+ every week in the future. The second argumentative essay, because I practiced a lot of high school composition and got an average score, I basically didn't review it. The expectation is that I can write a popular music score. If I have time to read other topics, I will write one to find feelings.
Generally speaking, the review of 396 focuses on mathematics and logic. These two parts need a lot of practice on the basis of learning knowledge points. Writing review pays more attention to the method of argumentation validity analysis, followed by writing speed. Because a 600-word article is also time-consuming, it is mainly arranged according to your own writing situation.