Maoguai looks scary, but in fact he is an ignorant scum. The boy with big eyes can't compare with anyone in reading, but he has no choice but to be a man who is not scary. It is difficult for them to stand on campus, and they can only prove themselves through the "scare contest". As a result, a "waste wood alliance" firewire composed of marginal roles such as top student, school scum and unemployed uncle was established. The young monsters finally proved themselves in a special and inspirational way by encouraging each other.

Monsters university, as a prequel story, basically tells the story of past lives, the character of Monster Company, but the story is a little thin because he relies too much on the setting of the game module of "Scare Contest". The details are well handled and the overall quality is up to standard.

Praise and doubt coexist.

16 The average score of 66 points given by the media on metacritic is 82%.

Justin Chang, the film critic of Variety, is optimistic that the film will be welcomed by the audience. He also said that he liked the film better than the monster. He said, "Although it is 65,438+00 minutes longer than the monster, this new movie makes you feel that time passes faster, all thanks to a more exquisite story, so that it doesn't have to rely on a cute but boring little girl's scream and giggle to promote the plot."

Alonso Duralde of TheWrap commented: "monsters university is Pixar's average work. It can bring some laughter to your friends' party, but it is hard for you to remember it when 10 is reunited. "

Jake Coyle of the Associated Press commented that although "Monster University" failed to surpass Pixar's classic, the comparison was unfair, at least the film was much better than the sequel "cars 2".

Richard Corliss of Time magazine pointed out, "Since the three masterpieces (Kawara Tsutomu, Travels around the Flying House and Toy Story 3) were released one after another, the whole team seems to be in a state of' post-classic era'. But this lightweight movie still has enough charm to attract children to take their parents to the cinema to see the monsters in the cupboard. "

Todd McCarthy, the chief film critic of The Hollywood Reporter, gave a bad review mercilessly. McCarthy called it "worrying crappy work" and lacked imagination. "Whether there is creativity or inspiration is the difference between Pixar's best works and ordinary works. However, it is obvious that all the above elements have been declared as non-existent this time. To put it bluntly, Monster Company is not the kind of work that must be filmed, but more like a movie used to fill the schedule. "