This survey of the four major operators actually hopes that the four major communication operators will pay close attention to the development and application of 5G technology, because ZTE and Huawei, the two most powerful companies in the world, have been excluded from the US market. This trade negotiation in the United States is likely to require openness in this respect, because this is the "hegemonic" trade model of the United States and Trump's favorite trade model. If the United States demands as its European allies do, it is estimated that it will be severely retaliated!
Looking around the world, ZTE, Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia dominate the field of 5G telecom equipment, and we can see that there is no manufacturer in the United States. Many high-tech companies in the United States have become the origin of the original products in the 5G era, which is unacceptable to the "American imperialists".
The wireless communication infrastructure share of Huawei and ZTE has reached nearly 40% of the total market share, and the 5G test volume of Huawei and ZTE has occupied 40% of the market share, far exceeding that of Europe and America. These all stimulate the nerves of "American imperialists" all the time. More and more communication companies in Europe are inseparable from the equipment provided by Huawei, and the cooperation with Huawei and ZTE is certain. Of course, Europe can also provide technology and equipment, but some technologies are still authorized by Huawei and ZTE, which leads to high prices in Europe.
In order to make up for the shortcomings in 2G and 3G technologies, Huawei and ZTE laid out earlier in the 5G field. In 20 17 years, Huawei invested1200 million dollars in the research and development of new technologies, and this year it is expected to be around1500 million dollars. This kind of investment has far exceeded the two old competitors in Europe. In recent years, ZTE has also gained a lot in the 5G field. More than a dozen 5G pre-commercial networks have been established around the world, and several 5G standard solutions have been developed. On the 5G intelligent terminal, a series of application products such as mobile phones and tablets have been developed. Driven by a series of mature technologies and products, European communication companies can easily choose products from China. Because in the field of communication, stability is the cornerstone of communication success. Otherwise, even the most advanced technology will be abandoned, such as Motorola's iridium project.
With ZTE and Huawei leading in American communication products, the US government, especially the Trump administration, saw the threat, which is seriously inconsistent with the leading position of the United States in the world. This kind of threatening behavior must be stopped, so the "hegemonic" trade of the United States has once again come to the forefront.
Why didn't European countries follow the United States to boycott Huawei? I received many telephone interviews today, all about Britain's new attitude towards Huawei.
According to the Financial Times, the National Cyber Security Center of the United Kingdom has determined that there are ways to limit the risks of using Huawei equipment in future 5G high-speed networks. Two people familiar with the matter disclosed this unpublished conclusion to the Financial Times. The newspaper commented that this conclusion dealt a heavy blow to the efforts of the United States to persuade its allies to keep Huawei out of the telecom high-speed system.
Britain is a five-eye alliance country, and this conclusion of the British government may indeed be used by other European countries as a reason for continuing to use Huawei equipment.
Britain is the leader of the European Union (although it is leaving the European Union), and this attitude of Britain will set an example for other small European countries.
There are two reasons why the younger brother, who is recognized as running with the United States, is against the United States on this issue.
First, Europe's telecommunications equipment manufacturing capacity is very strong. But it has little causal relationship with Britain. Ericsson is Swedish, Nokia is Finnish and Siemens is German.
Although the British Vodafone is world-famous, its nature, like China Mobile, is an operator engaged in network construction, not equipment manufacturing. Therefore, its telecom network equipment mainly depends on imports.
Compared with Huawei, Ericsson, Nokia and Siemens have expensive equipment and have no advantage in technology. Therefore, regardless of political factors, Huawei equipment is Britain's first choice.
Second, telecommunications equipment is related to national security, and it is necessary to conduct safety inspections on imported telecommunications equipment. Britain has long established an equipment safety inspection agency for Huawei. This organization is led by Britain, and Huawei fully cooperates with it to conduct open and transparent security checks on Huawei equipment that intends to enter the British telecommunications network. Therefore, the UK confirmed that Huawei equipment is controllable and safe.
You may ask, why doesn't the United States conduct security checks on Huawei equipment? In fact, Huawei has long proposed to the United States to open all codes for naked inspection, but the United States refused to inspect them.
Why did the United States refuse? There is a simple reason. If the United States accepts the security requirements, it must conclude that Huawei's equipment is fine. The United States must give a safe conclusion, and then this conspiracy theory can no longer be used.
Although the United States has asked its European allies to boycott Huawei, technical experts and politicians from other countries are not fools. They all know the intention of the United States. If they blindly boycott Huawei, they will get nothing but a high price.
After punishing ZTE, the United States is investigating Huawei through judicial means, which explains at least two problems: first, it shows that Huawei is indeed better than ZTE in independent innovation, unlike ZTE's complete dependence on foreign enterprises, and the United States has not found an entrance that can easily sanction Huawei like ZTE. In desperation, we have to use judicial means to see if we can find an entrance from legal defects; First, it shows that Huawei is much stronger than ZTE in technology, technological innovation, international competitiveness and market influence, and it is a thorn in the side of the United States. Therefore, we have to rack our brains to find the gap between Huawei.
However, from the current actual situation, it seems that we can't find the technical end, so we can only start from the judicial end. However, over the years, Huawei has been investigated by the United States and other western countries in the judicial field more than once or twice. We have conducted targeted research on possible judicial investigations and analyzed possible risks, and we should not find the gap. Huawei should not be harmed by American governments and enterprises such as the US Department of Justice and ZTE.
As for Europe, the United States has made so many troubles and found no problems. Why bother again? Instead, it is better to cooperate with Huawei to gain more benefits in the field of 5g when entering the China market.
Anyone with a discerning eye should also see that this kind of behavior is completely malicious to find fault with the US imperialists. Huawei has already announced its withdrawal from the US market and is still investigating Huawei. This is too bullying. It's time for China to crack down on Apple, IBM and Microsoft ... Who's afraid of who in this world? Previously, many people thought that ZTE's sanctions were just an example. Now it's time to wake up. We are so naive.
Lauter is really good at playing tricks. On the one hand, he took the initiative to send officials to China for talks next week and let the outside world know that an agreement will be reached soon. On the other hand, he asked the Ministry of Justice to investigate Huawei, which is really good at singing a double reed.
In fact, the investigation of Huawei in the United States has a long history, but it has been suffering from no evidence. We can only pressure domestic companies to refuse to cooperate with Huawei and force Huawei to withdraw from the US market. The data shows that Huawei's global sales revenue has increased by 4.82 times in the past decade, with an average compound growth rate of 19.09%. With the rapid increase of global market share, Huawei has become an important pillar of China's technology industry and a strategic threat to the United States. Therefore, the United States is here to find fault. This kind of unilateral trade protectionism is indeed shameful.
And I believe that the more restrictions, the more faults we find, which will only arouse the anger of our country and strive for scientific and technological strength. These years have proved to be true. Under the constant restrictions of foreign countries, China has indeed made a lot of achievements in its scientific and technological strength, but we should not be blindly confident. We still have to face up to the gap and forge ahead, so as to make greater progress.
After reading the praise, I am rich, and the original code is not easy. I like my answer, thank you for your attention!
At present, the pillars of the real economy industry in the United States are: chip semiconductor industry, aviation industry, biopharmaceutical industry and so on.
The semiconductor industry is of great significance to America. At present, China has begun to invest heavily in the research and development of semiconductor industry, which will definitely have an impact on the chip semiconductor industry in the United States. The United States recently launched a precise and targeted attack on semiconductor enterprises in China. The United States sanctioned Huawei and ZTE for selling so-called communication equipment to Iran. Excuse me, even if it is sold to Iranian civil communication equipment, what's the matter? Iranian people can communicate better with their relatives and friends online, can't they? More famous is that the United States sanctioned ZTE and Huawei.
In addition to Huawei and ZTE, domestic semiconductor industry. There are also SMIC, Ziguang Group (Changjiang Warehouse) and other enterprises.
There are many European countries with different scientific and technological strengths. Europe's overall semiconductor industry is not as good as that of the United States, so the rise of China's semiconductor enterprises has little impact on Europe, but has a certain impact on American enterprises.
At the same time, many countries in Europe lack 5G technology, and companies like Huawei need to improve 5G equipment and technology.
Qualcomm is also one of Xiaomi's overseas investors, and Xiaomi's VIE offshore financing framework agreement has offshore operation capability for Xiaomi.
The United States blocked Huawei because Huawei's 5G technology is too advanced and too safe to be controlled by the United States. Europe (some countries, others are afraid to use Huawei 5G because of the influence of the United States) wants to use Huawei 5G technology, or because Huawei 5G technology is advanced, the price is cheaper.
The United States banned Huawei because Huawei's 5G technology was too advanced and safe, and before it was controlled by the United States in the 4G era, it was dominated by western communication companies such as Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia and Cisco, which were leading in technology and standards. Although China enterprises such as Huawei and ZTE started to rise from 4G, China enterprises are still at a disadvantage in terms of global telecommunications standards and technology dominance.
It should be said that until the 4G era, the United States can still profoundly influence and even control the global communications market. In addition to the development of technology and industry, standards and profitability, it is very important that these western communication equipment companies and telecom operators have to cooperate with the coercion of the United States (and other countries in the so-called five-eye alliance: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) to provide them with monitoring and monitoring of all communication networks in the world. To put it bluntly, it is to leave a back door for American intelligence agencies.
But it is definitely impossible for China enterprises to do such a thing. In addition, Huawei and ZTE, China enterprises in the 5G era, are ahead of Ericsson and Nokia in Europe in technology, especially crushing Qualcomm in enterprise business, forming a comprehensive advantage over western communication enterprises. The leading position of China enterprises such as Huawei and ZTE in 5G patents (especially standard essential patents) shows that the United States has fallen far behind the 5G era.
The United States is worried that if China's 5G equipment manufacturers such as Huawei do well in the global market in the future, they will not only lose a big profit area, but also may not be able to monitor and monitor the global telecommunications network system as in the past. Fair and aboveboard market competition failed Huawei, so it completely blocked Huawei by inferior means and contained it globally.
Quite a few countries in Europe want to use Huawei's 5G technology, or because Huawei's 5G technology is advanced and the price is cheaper. There are still many European telecom operators who want to use Huawei's 5G technology in the face of ugly, brutal suppression and even threats in the United States. Obviously, the smell of wine is not afraid of the depth of the alley. Huawei 5G is too advanced and safe, and its cost is much lower than Ericsson and Nokia. No telecom operator can exclude good and convenient products and technologies, so they still insist on using Huawei 5G.
In addition, in the 4G era, Huawei did a good job in the European market. Continue to use Huawei's 5G technology on the basis of it, which has more continuity and cost advantages. There are also a few countries that claim not to use Huawei 5G and even dismantle old Huawei telecom equipment under the pressure of the United States, but they are dragging their feet in words and actions. Telecom operators waste their own money, but also affect the operation effect, and the United States does not give tangible benefits, who will be so stupid?
In the long-term use of Huawei equipment, European users have fully verified the reliability and safety of Huawei products, and no one believes the lies of the United States. Therefore, most customers in the European market will still accept Huawei's 5G technology and products.
On February 6th, 2020, at the invitation of CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies), American Attorney General William Barr attended the China Initiative Conference and delivered a keynote speech.
This may be the reason why the United States blocked Huawei.
Barr talked about China's unprecedented challenge to the US technology offensive and Huawei's leading position in the 5g field. He said that since the19th century, the United States has been in a leading position in the world in terms of innovative technology. It is the power of science and technology that makes America prosperous and safe.
The standard of living in the United States, the expanding economic opportunities for future generations and the national security of the United States all depend on the continuous technological leadership.
Barr said that 5g technology is at the center of emerging technologies and the industrial world. In essence, communication networks are no longer just for communication.
It is evolving into the central nervous system of the next generation Internet, industrial Internet and the next generation industrial system, all of which will depend on this infrastructure.
China has taken the lead in the field of 5g, accounting for 40% of the global infrastructure market. For the first time in history, the United States did not lead the next technological era. It is estimated that by 2025, the industrial Internet driven by 5g will create economic opportunities as high as $23 trillion.
If China takes the lead in realizing 5g, it will dominate the opportunities brought by a series of intertwined emerging technologies relying on the 5g platform.
At present, Huawei has become a leading supplier in all continents except North America. There are no equipment suppliers in the United States.
China's main competitors are Finland's Nokia (17%) and Sweden's Ericsson (14%). China is using various forces to expand the global market share of 5g.
It is estimated that the total market size of 5g infrastructure is $76 billion. China is providing more than $654.38+00 billion in incentives to help customers buy equipment.
In addition, 5g is based on a series of technologies, including semiconductors, optical fibers, rare earths and materials. China has begun to localize all these elements and no longer rely on foreign suppliers.
Barr feels that in the next five years, the global map and application dominance of 5 G will be decided.
The question is whether the United States and its allies can compete enough against China under this window.
In order to maintain and occupy enough market share, so as to maintain a long-term and strong competitive position and avoid losing the dominant position to China.
Barr said that time is pressing and the United States and its allies must act quickly.
Obviously, Huawei is ready. "We have no choice but to win." Huawei said.
Europe is Huawei's most important overseas market. Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia have formed a "three pillars" in the European communication equipment market. Huawei's position in the European market is inseparable from its leading communication equipment technology, and it is also inseparable from providing quality services and affordable prices for European operators.
When Huawei first entered the European market, it developed distributed base stations according to the needs of operators, which reflected Huawei's service attitude of customizing communication equipment according to the needs of operators.
Huawei ranks among the top three smartphones in Europe. Its smartphones are ahead of Apple and Samsung in taking photos and 5g technology.
In an interview, the British Prime Minister also demonstrated the 5g technology with Huawei mobile phones, which highlighted the high recognition of Huawei products by European officials.
It is precisely because of Huawei's competitive advantages in technology, service and price that European operators call on the EU not to exclude Huawei.
Otherwise, it will lead Europe to lag behind other economies in the construction of 5g networks, and it will also lead Europe to pay higher costs for the construction of 5g networks.
It is precisely because of the strong demand for Huawei in the European market that European countries are in a dilemma at the request of the United States.
Now Britain has finally made a decision to support Huawei, which will make more European countries choose to cooperate with Huawei.
Now Huawei has decided to establish a production base in Europe to contribute to the economic development in Europe, which will undoubtedly help to further strengthen the support of European countries for Huawei. Baiming Technology believes that more European countries will choose to cooperate with Huawei in the future.
Huawei has established a manufacturing base in the European market, providing a large number of employment opportunities for the local market, which is undoubtedly a blow to the current President Trump who is committed to promoting the development of American manufacturing.
In 20 19, the American economy slowed down by 1 percentage point due to the disaster of Boeing. Huawei can officially promote the enterprises needed for economic development.
Perhaps the United States will regret what Huawei did at work, forcing Huawei to leave the United States, resulting in the loss of a large number of employment opportunities in the United States.
In any case, the United States has its own "deviant" and we have advanced technology, which is the mainstream and even more indispensable in today's world. Come on Huawei, come on China.
The hegemony of the United States depends on scientific and technological leadership, including the military field, and also on the strength of science and technology. So the United States wants to maintain its position as the world's technological hegemon. The reason used by the United States to ban Huawei is to endanger national security. In fact, it is Huawei's technology research and development, which has already put pressure on the United States, especially the leading position of 5G technology in the world, which has made the United States feel the possibility of rising, so it is necessary to suppress it.
Europe uses Huawei's 5G because it has no strength to suppress Huawei and no core technology. We can only settle for the second best and seek cooperation, that is, global cooperation now advocated, and cooperation will win.
Referring to the American attack on Japanese semiconductor industry in that year, in 1980s, Japanese semiconductor industry sprang up suddenly, winning more than half of the global share in the semiconductor field, entering the American market and occupying five seats in the ranking of semiconductor enterprises. However, Japan's technological origin actually came from the United States, but it surpassed the United States in just a few years, which made the United States realize that its scientific and technological authority was challenged, and then increased tariffs. Japan was forced to sign the Japan-US semiconductor treaty by anti-dumping, forcing the Japanese market to retain 20% market share of American semiconductor companies. In the following years, the market share of Japanese semiconductor companies was gradually eroded, and finally they completely lost their dominance.
The United States' action to ban Huawei is just like suppressing the Japanese. Huawei's 5G technology is leading the world. This is the first time that Huawei has stepped onto the forefront of science and technology since 1840, but it is still in its infancy. Obviously, the attempt of the United States is to suppress the rise of Huawei and the rise of China's scientific and technological enterprises by relying on its own advantages, so as to achieve the purpose of maintaining its own technological hegemony, rather than simply safeguarding national security.
Xie You invited: What do some people like and need? Just because America doesn't like it doesn't mean other countries don't like it. Proportion: Some people like clothes. Some people like eating, while others like music. Some people like drama, while others like songs. Some people like dancing, some people like painting, some people like calligraphy, some people like landscape maps, some people like research and development of production technology, and some people like appreciation. "Waiting" for anyone who likes to appreciate can't ban anything. Forever. Is the US crackdown on Huawei political? First, when the United States falls behind, it doesn't want China to be ahead at all, and other western countries can do the same. Second, it is national security. If the United States uses Huawei 5g, how can it monitor the third European country in the world? From the commercial economy, Huawei is the best choice. Politically, it doesn't want to completely follow the United States and China, but it is too difficult to offend America.