Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - A+ ranking in the fifth round of subject assessment
A+ ranking in the fifth round of subject assessment
The a+ ranking in the fifth round of discipline evaluation is: Peking University 3 1 A+ discipline, Tsinghua University 22 A+ disciplines, Zhejiang University 19 A+ disciplines.

First place: 3 1 Peking University A+ subject.

As one of the top universities in China, Peking University has a strong teaching strength. In the fifth round of subject evaluation, Peking University has 3 1 subject only before A+ subject, which shows that its teaching background is unfathomable. The number of 365,438+0A+subjects is far ahead of other universities, and even Tsinghua is slightly inferior.

Second place: 22 A+ subjects in Tsinghua University.

As a university that can compete with Peking University, Tsinghua's teaching strength is naturally not weak. There are 22 A+ subjects alone, and the number is already very impressive.

Third place: Zhejiang University 19 A+ subjects.

The relationship between Zhejiang University and Shanghai Jiaotong University is just like that between Tsinghua University and Peking University. We can see the competition between the two universities in the rankings of major universities. In the fifth round of discipline evaluation, Zhejiang University ranked third in the number of A+ disciplines ahead of Shanghai Jiaotong University. It is worth mentioning that although the number of A+ disciplines in Zhejiang University is not as good as that in Peking University and Tsinghua, the total number of A+ disciplines is higher than that in Tsinghua and Peking University, ranking first.

The purpose of subject evaluation is:

First, serve the overall situation, implement the spirit of "encouraging specialized agencies and social intermediary institutions to evaluate disciplines, majors, curriculum level and quality of institutions of higher learning" put forward in the Outline of National Education Planning, and serve the overall situation of "improving quality, optimizing structure, encouraging characteristics and collaborative innovation" in graduate education.

The second is to serve colleges and universities. Through the evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of discipline construction, we can help colleges and universities understand the current situation and advantages and disadvantages of disciplines, promote the connotation construction of disciplines, and improve the quality of postgraduate training and degree awarding.

The third is to serve the society, provide objective subject level information, and provide reference for students' enrollment, subject and social talent flow.