At this point, the context of the case has been basically clarified. However, people's deconstruction of Wu really began. Many people said angrily, "Now that the situation is clear, it is better to implement it." But in fact, for such a relatively typical "consanguineous homicide", the lessons and enlightenment behind it are not the punishment for criminals, even if it is the real purpose, but more importantly, as the "consanguineous homicide" itself, the lessons and enlightenment behind it.
In a secular sense, Wu, as an outstanding student of Peking University, should be promising. Unfortunately, when he couldn't feel the warmth of his old home, his thoughts were destroyed. As a public opinion, I actually only saw the cruelty of my mother's murder, but I couldn't understand it. As a son, in the despair and helplessness of his mother's murder.
Many times, the biggest dilemma of "family killing" is not interest, but the most fundamental problem is the dilemma of family. This point, when Wu Gang was arrested, the media had already speculated on it. Generally speaking, they all revolve around the deconstruction theory of psychology, which can't be said to be completely correct, but it does reflect many problems.
However, it is more attractive around the core. Such as "killing mother", "male model", "girlfriend" and "excellent student", but these details may not be the core of this case. Many times, a person's crime is not an instantaneous and short-term trigger, especially in the case of murder by relatives, but a cumulative release. This makes us not only attack the offender, but also analyze the compensation from the offender's point of view when facing the case.
After all, just like "Wu's mother was killed", this is a family tragedy. It's hard to accept that a promising son killed a highly educated mother. However, everyone and every family have their own difficulties. Many outsiders only see the tip of the iceberg, but the secular feeling is very good and can't be a placebo in many cases. So what should happen will always happen, even if it is absurd and hateful.
Whether "Wu killed his mother" proves that he doesn't love his mother at all must be an embarrassing proposition. In fact, human nature is an "onion", peeled off layer by layer, mixed with love and hate. Most theories can only be clarified and confirmed through the tension of human nature. Empathy and theoretical analysis are not the whole story in essence.
As Wu said after killing her mother, she wanted to commit suicide after killing her mother, which means they will die together. However, people's thoughts are always changing. When he saw his mother's death, his heart was full of fear. As a result, "death together" became "killing mother", and the whole incident was no longer to escape from life, but to show a lot of hatred and become to escape from mother.
In the final analysis, the family relationship between Wu and his mother cannot be denied because of "killing his mother". In a sense, the generation of parents who have similar personality with Wu's mother is bound to be universal. They have a strong desire for control and love their children, but the burden on them is also heavy. In short, the deeper you love, the deeper you hate.
The most puzzling thing about "family killing" is "kindness". Where there is love, there is reciprocity. In particular, "parent-child relationship" is the key to "affection". Therefore, there is always something wrong with the trigger. However, in reality, similar situations always exist, which seems to be thought-provoking.
In the past, the story of the farmer and the snake was used as a comparative comment on similar tragedies. But in fact, it is mainly from the perspective of morality, not from the perspective of human nature to open the real context of tragedy. So, the more sound you make, the more cliche it becomes. Of course, as far as jurisprudence is concerned, this is a compulsory measure.
However, back to the real human interweaving, we should look at it separately. Otherwise, the tragedy is only a personal tragedy, and public opinion is just a bystander. Therefore, for the case of Wu Yimu, its own enlightenment is more important in the energy of the later stage of the case. For Wu, the legal and moral aspects may have been determined long ago, but the most lacking link is the perspective and reflection on human nature.
Therefore, it is more meaningful to deconstruct Wu's personality framework than to map family of origin. Because the changes of personality itself in the process of killing and accumulating are ultimately impermanent. In the final analysis, multiple personalities are the background color of most people, but most people don't let "personality evil" appear, and Wu belongs to the bad boy who was beaten.
In the final analysis, "highly educated" does not prove a person's "mental health" or "integrity". However, in the general view of the world, people are keen to take knowledge as a standard to measure a person's mental health. Therefore, after Wu's mother was killed, the ordinary media added the label of "Peking University student" to the title of the report, aiming to show that this was the tragedy of a "highly educated" student, thus attracting more attention.
But when we examine the details behind these tragedies, we find that it is precisely because the purpose of education is not to focus on adults, but to pay a lot of attention to the achievements of things that it is easy to cause such tragedies. Therefore, the return to education itself, whether it is family education or school education, can not ignore the nature of adults, otherwise "higher education" will only become a greater tragic driving force.