Except for those who apply for the Master of Laws (Law), most of the candidates who take the Master of Laws (Illegal Studies) are illegal undergraduates with no foundation or weak foundation, and the theoretical foundation of law will be relatively lacking. The LLM exam pays more attention to the practical application of law, and the depth of the exam is not as good as that of LLM. As for the Master of Laws, there are many law undergraduates applying for it. After systematic legal study, their strength is definitely not easily surpassed by a layman for half a year. Moreover, the LLM exam pays more attention to theoretical depth and academic level, and there will be more test books designated or not. This thing doesn't crash easily.
LLM's tuition is relatively expensive (generally 10000 RMB/year), and LLM can't participate in some scholarships of some schools. However, LLM's general tuition is not particularly expensive, and it has a generous scholarship and public expense system. In terms of cost performance, there is a big gap between the two.
Landlord, if you don't want English to be a tragedy, you should lay a good foundation for postgraduate English as soon as possible. It seems that it is a trend to increase the difficulty of English in postgraduate entrance examination (the problem in 2009 was not easy, and 10 was even more abnormal. How many heroes are poor and planted in English), and English is the first priority in postgraduate entrance examination.