Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - Similarities and differences between photography and video recording
Similarities and differences between photography and video recording
According to my understanding, one is still shooting and the other is dynamic shooting.

I'm sorry, I thought you were asking about still photography and dynamic video shooting of the camera, which simplified the question. So you are talking about art, haha.

I will give you an article.

On photography and photography

(Tieling TV University/Zhang Ningxin)

If someone asks me, do you like photography or video? Answer: As far as the two methods are concerned, I prefer the former. Because photography can capture the instantaneous beauty in real life and stay in history forever: for example, after Wang won the Olympic Games, only solidified photos can make people appreciate it for a long time; The camera can only give people memories of the development of flowing things, but it is fleeting, and a wonderful moment will not stay for a long time, even if it is frozen. If photography is equivalent to poetry in literary creation, then photography should be prose. Although they are different, they are similar: both images reflect real life.

The instantaneous beauty of photography is different from the flowing beauty of photography: the former can stop for a long time and feel the essence of instantaneous recording. For example, before the founding of the People's Republic of China, Chairman Mao flew to Chongqing to negotiate and stood on the gangway, leaving a moment of "waves". The solidification of this historical moment fully embodies the righteousness of China's * * * production party, which opens the skylight of wisdom in both content and form; The camera can gallop freely on the vast flowing picture, leaving the whole process of things' beginning, development, climax and ending. For example, 100 meter camera live broadcast can show the whole process of athletes from starting to hitting the line. Photography is the essence of solidified history; Photography has a broader space for self-expression than photography, and freely shows the ending of things shaking forward.

As far as photography and video recording are concerned, I think photography will take more effort than video recording. For example, The Great Wall photographed by People's Pictorial in 1970s was obtained after three years' observation and experience, and was chosen as the wall hanging in the hall of the UN Security Council. Every time you press the shutter, you can only freeze one instant picture. Even if you edit it later, you can only choose from many instant pictures. Photography has the opportunity to freely choose materials, not only has a broad post-production (editing) space, but also can use "montage" means to complete the typification process of events at different times and places according to the laws of real life. For example, the large-scale documentary "The Forbidden City" was "typified", giving the audience a glimpse of the whole picture of the Forbidden City in a short time. ...

The above is just a brief talk about the similarities and differences between photography and video, and I have no intention to belittle one side.