Answer with my diary.

There is such a phenomenon:

why

Many people walk the seemingly wide road of others, but say they are unhappy.

Probably, because others helped him choose this path.

Think about it, in the process of growing up, have we completely accepted the indoctrination of others and fully recognized others?

Treat things as behaviorism or humanism.

Of course, I'm not saying that behaviorism and humanism are absolutely good or bad, but I just want to discuss them from different angles.

Behaviorism has a remarkable effect, but it is not as euphemistic as humanism.

Should people and things be viewed from the perspective of love?

When should we be biased towards behaviorism and humanism? When should we be biased towards realism and idealism?

Think carefully about how we should form our own ideology and how to strengthen it in the process of development. Hearing the word "wall of consciousness" from others, this barrier will become our weapon to face the world.

In the process of forming consciousness, we must passively accept the ideology of others, but in the process of forming our own ideology, this passive acceptance is by no means eternal.

The formation of consciousness requires us to think actively and independently.

Take the initiative to think about our personal value, the meaning of life, and the value we can embody in the social collective.

Think independently and think about what we can do to avoid being completely transformed into a machine that will only contribute value and lose the meaning and enthusiasm of life.

Words, poems, music and a series of things that can reflect romance and elegance should be felt by people and promoted to form and integrate into personal and unique consciousness, instead of becoming a slightly patterned and mechanized answering standard like mainstream education today.

Of course, there will be no absolute sense of freedom. Independent thinking does not mean complete negation.

At present, we should do what we should do according to the current standards, and then reflect our personal ideas in another suitable environment.

Independent thinking shapes personality. When we export our own thoughts and accept others' thoughts, it is necessary to keep personal thinking. When our ideological and ideological barriers are gradually improved, they will gradually be reflected in our actions and language, becoming a stronger output of ideas (the word stronger is not accurate), thus affecting people around us. In a way, this is the embodiment of personal value. Personal value is not limited to material creation, but also has spiritual influence.

The world will be divided into many "camps", and people in their own "camps" may generally be unable to understand the thoughts of people in other "camps". At this time, we need to think actively and independently, avoid absolute identification and absolute negation, and maintain identification and questioning, which is similar to seeking common ground while reserving differences.

Unilaterally, this may be reflected in the individual's self-denial and self-identity.

After self-denial, people often find reasons to comfort themselves to continue self-denial; Self-identity tends to look for problems, solve problems, improve themselves and continue self-identity. I think what we have to do is how to deal with the relationship between the two, how to avoid falling into absolute self-denial and self-identity, and learn from the advantages of both sides to make the most suitable choice.

Just like balancing behaviorism and humanism, positive thinking and independent thinking, it can help them form their own ideological system, help them build their own lives and help them find their own meaning and value in life.

Frankly speaking, I don't deeply understand the meaning of behaviorism and humanism, and the word "consciousness wall" is not original. Maybe it's just pretending that you can form * * * knowledge. Sometimes it's different because you think differently.