The first is background funds and the like. Some people say that poor travel is actually very popular among college students. As students, college students have actually grown into adults and can shoulder their own responsibilities. However, they are not completely "weaned". The source of funds is still parents, or family support is needed. But I am a person who yearns for freedom, so I still want to go out and see more. At this time, traveling in poverty is a good choice for them. It won't cost too much and they can see the outside world.
The second is the help of society. There are still many good people in society, especially poor students, who are willing to lend a helping hand. Therefore, ordinary students can still get good treatment if they travel badly. The social awareness of poor travel may not be very high, but there will still be some goodwill for students who are not rich at hand.
There may also be reasons for being popular abroad. As we all know, foreign countries are open to the outside world and have a high degree of acceptance of many things. There are also many examples of long-term business trips abroad. If it is influenced by foreign countries, it is not too much.
In fact, the matter of poor travel is a test for people, whether poor tourists or passers-by, the test is the willpower of poor tourists and the love of passers-by. I still hope that everyone can go out for a walk more when economic conditions permit. When there are too many poor travelers, it will inevitably exhaust the love of passers-by, and poor travel has become an extremely difficult thing.