Interview with Dr. Samuel Wood

I have been very close to my mother all my life .. She is an outstanding journalist, writer and great woman. Sadly, Shen suffered from complications related to diabetes. It was absolutely terrible for me when she lost her sight and most of her walking ability. She died from a fall seven or eight years ago. At her funeral, I vowed that one day I would do something for her situation.

I have been close to my mother all my life. She is an outstanding educator, writer and an amazing lady. Unfortunately, she suffers from complications caused by diabetes. I was frightened when she lost her sight and most of her walking ability. Seven or eight years ago, she fell to her death. At her funeral, I vowed to do something for her illness one day.

A few years later, I read about Korean research on stem cells. In 2004 and 2005, Huang Yuxi fraudulently reported that he had successfully produced human embryonic stem cells by cloning. I didn't know it was a scam at that time, so it was very exciting to think that a long list of diseases could be treated.

As the years passed, I read about the work done by Koreans in stem cells. From 2004 to 2005, Huang Yuxi lied that he had successfully cultivated human embryonic stem cells through cloning technology.

At that time, people didn't know it was fake, so people were excited to think that a long list of diseases could be cured.

Together with another gentleman, I found the stem cell research company Stemagen, whose father hand died of ALS. One night we went out for a drink and we started talking about our parents. We want to do something meaningful for them.

My other husband and I co-founded Stammorgan stem cell research company. This gentleman's father died of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. One night, we went out for a drink and talked about our parents and what we wanted to do as their legacy.

Is it a blessing or a curse? Is it good or bad?

At the moment when we decided to start Stemagen, I read all the information I could about the past cloning efforts. Dolly the cloned sheep in 1997 is very interesting, but at that stage, people did not pay attention to the cloned stem cells; They focus on the reproductive possibilities of cloning.

As soon as I decided to set up Stammorgan stem cell research company, I read all kinds of cloning experiments in the past. Dolly the cloned sheep from 1997 has aroused great interest. But what people were concerned about at that time was not the cloning technology at the stem cell level, but the possibility of asexual reproduction.

From the medical and scientific point of view, human reproductive cloning is completely wrong in ethics, even ignoring any religious issues related to it. The reason is that most reproductive clones of other species are actually abnormal, the abortion rate is very high, the stillbirth rate is very high, the fetus is deformed and dies shortly after birth, and so on.

From the medical and scientific point of view, human cloning is ethically wrong. Even ignoring its related religious problems, the reason is that most asexual individuals of other species are deformed, with high abortion rate, high mortality rate, fetal malformation and early death, and so on.

It is absolutely wrong to take a person away and let them experience something that may bring great pain, but there is no good result. Even if people can adopt the technology we developed and start to do it (or even do it successfully), we hope they won't.

It is absolutely wrong to let people experience something that is very likely to suffer great pain, but can't get any good results. Even if someone can take advantage of the technology we have developed and try to put it into practice (which may be successful), we still hope that they will not do so.

On the other hand, therapeutic cloning does not involve any risk of human life, and actually provides great potential for alleviating the suffering of real human beings who are experiencing some terrible things.

On the other hand, therapeutic cloning technology does not involve any threat to human life, and it can indeed provide great possibilities for people who are suffering to alleviate their pain.

To some extent, I am a pure scientist, and I know that many different studies or discoveries may be used for evil. As scientists, our job is to make the best use of this technology and let as many other scientists as possible use this technology to help us do good things. For a scientist, there is really no effective way to stop others from using their knowledge for things they shouldn't do.

To some extent, I am a pure scientist, but I know that all kinds of research or discoveries may be used to do evil. As scientists, our job is to make full use of this technology, so that as many other scientists as possible can master it and help us do good things. As far as scientists are concerned, there is actually no effective way to prevent others from using their knowledge where they should not.

We need to be honest with the technology we use. They need to be copied by others, s9, and we are providing a road map. I hope that the existing legislation and the strong public opposition caused by any attempt to clone human beings can prevent anyone from embarking on this path.

We must be honest with the technology we use. These technologies must be replicated by others. In this way, we provide a road map. I hope that appropriate laws and regulations and strong public opposition to trying to clone human beings can stop anyone who wants to go that way.

What did they say? There is not a technology that has not been used for some evil purposes, and some people will try to carry out human reproductive cloning. I think this is inevitable, and it is almost impossible to eliminate it through legislation.

What did they say? They say that technology has never been used for some evil purpose at any time. Frankly speaking, I really think someone will try to clone people. I really think this is inevitable and it is impossible to stop it through legislation.

The requirement of fame

I was said to be the first person to "clone myself". There are different types of cloning. At the cellular level, yes, I was the first person to clone myself. We have thought a lot about how to deal with whose cells we should use and whether we should let the world and the scientific community know who the first cell clone was. Finally, we decided to add the human side to the cloning.

It is said that I was the first person to "clone myself". There are different types of clones. At the cellular level, yes, I was indeed the first person to clone myself. Whose cells should we use and whether we should let the world and the scientific community know who is the first cell clone. We have thought a lot about how to handle the appeal. Finally, we decided to humanize human cloning.

I didn't expect it to cause the first controversy, but I am still glad that we have embarked on this road. We received emails and phone calls from thousands of people in need.

I didn't expect this to cause an uproar. But I'm still happy with the road we've traveled. We received thousands of emails and phone calls from people in need.

I think that by moving forward and putting it on the face, we made it very real, and now people all over the world know that cloning is here. I believe it will be used for treatment soon, so I think our goal has been achieved.

I think by actively humanizing cloning, we make cloning technology very real. Now people all over the world know about cloning. I believe that cloning technology will soon be used to treat diseases, so I think our goal has been achieved.

Pure science, pure science

The thing is, a woman with informed consent donated an egg, and we took out her genetic material from the egg. Then we put a skin cell into the egg.

Here's the thing: a lady was told the truth and agreed to donate an egg. We take genetic material from the egg and then implant a single skin cell into the egg.

We are really interested in creating stem cell lines for specific diseases and specific people. The process of extracting cells from a person does not take more than a minute or two. For example, you can take some skin cells from your arm, and in a minute or two, you can get the cells you need to complete this process.

What we are really interested in is the establishment of stem cell series for specific diseases and specific individuals. The process of removing cells from someone only takes a minute or two. For example, you can extract skin cells from your arm, and after a minute or two, you can get the cells needed for this process.

This process enables us to study the causes of specific diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, ALS or Parkinson's disease, and then study various treatments for these diseases. If stem cell lines are produced for any given individual and then transplanted back to that individual, they will not be rejected by that individual.

This process helps us to explore the causes of specific diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Parkinson's disease, and to study various methods to treat these diseases. If stem cell series are cultured for a specific individual and then transplanted back to that individual, they will not be rejected.

Sweet success

I always think that when our research is successful, I will be glad that we have finished this research, while others have not. In fact, it is transcendental-when you look through a miniature telescope, you may see what it looked like a long time ago, at least in part.

I always think that when our research results are successful, I will be glad that we have achieved results that others have not yet achieved. In fact, this research is really great ... through the microscope, you can at least partially see what you were like a long time ago.

Tears welled up in my eyes when I looked down at the cloned blastocyst. I did this for my mother, and I realized that if she could live a few more years, maybe we could use this technology to help her. It is exciting to see the potential that she has never had a chance to experience.

Tears welled up in my eyes when I looked down at the cloned blastocyst. I did this research for my mother, and I think as long as my mother can live a few more years, maybe we can use this technology to save her. Seeing this possibility, a possibility that mothers don't have a chance to enjoy it personally, can't help but make people feel deeply moved.

There is a big misunderstanding that we decided to destroy these embryos for some reason. Because of scientific fraud in the past, there are so many doubts about this process that there is no doubt that it is crucial that they are clones.

There is a great misunderstanding that we want to destroy these cloned embryos for some reason. Because of the previous scientists' fraudulent behavior, people have a lot of doubts about our research process, so it is very important to ensure that it is really a cloned embryo.

During the analysis, the embryos were destroyed as necessary. In other words, to get genetic material from inside the cell for analysis, you must destroy the cell. We hope to avoid destroying them.

In the process of analysis, we must destroy those embryos. In other words, to extract genetic material from cells for analysis, you must destroy the cells. How we wish we could avoid destroying them.

Now we are trying our best to create stem cell lines, and people are paying attention to them with great interest.

At present, we are cultivating stem cell series around the clock, and people are also paying attention to the progress of this work with great interest.

The Pope and the President

The Pope and the President

There are many people who are against our work.

Our work met with opposition from all sides.

We were condemned by the Vatican and mentioned negatively in President Bush's State of the Union address. In a sense, this is an honor, because it is the way for us to do something meaningful. It is not every day that you are condemned by the Vatican and President Bush in the same week.

The Vatican condemns us, and President Bush's national conditions are also critical of us. In a sense, this is an honor, because it shows that we are doing something of great significance. It is not every day that the Holy See and President Bush condemn you within a week.

There is usually no dialogue between researchers and opponents in the field of embryonic stem cells.

In the field of embryonic stem cells, there is often no dialogue between researchers and opponents.

This is such an emotional and controversial topic that it makes no sense to me. Logically, this is not life. I agree that this is a potential life, but most embryos never become life. Most of them are born and die without implantation. The fetus is a life. This argument makes sense to me, but it makes no sense for me to observe an embryo in the laboratory and give it all the rights of human life.

This topic is so wonderful and controversial, in my opinion, it is really unnecessary. In terms of condemnation, embryos are not life. I admit that embryos may become life, but most embryos will never become life. After most embryos are produced, they are not used for transplantation and then die. The fetus has life. In my opinion, that view is reasonable. However, in my opinion, it is biased to look at the embryo in the laboratory and give it the right to all life.