Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - Whether adventure is good or bad (debate), I am the opponent. How can I refute it? I am debating, with examples and brief analysis! About whether people should explore!
Whether adventure is good or bad (debate), I am the opponent. How can I refute it? I am debating, with examples and brief analysis! About whether people should explore!
I have here a statistics of accidents caused by recent exploration: Beijing outdoor explorers were trapped in the desert of Inner Mongolia, and one person died; 3 1 Xinjiang's "donkey friends" got lost when crossing the ancient road of the auto market. There were 6 children in the team, and the youngest was less than 6 years old. Before that, 13 Tianjin University students were also in distress in the desert. 20 12 China Tibet expedition accident

If a rhetorical question is definitely put forward: the acquisition of food and resources depends not only on exploration. Exploration is just a way for us to acquire resources. Many resources in the world are wasted because of exploration. If we only get resources from exploration, the energy on the earth will be discovered and consumed sooner or later. So, let the earth keep a clean corner! Maybe it wasn't sent.

Now is the best way to protect resources.

Let me give you an example. The application of nuclear energy is an example. For example, nuclear power plant leakage in the former Russia: 1986 At 0: 24 local time on April 26th, serious leakage and explosion accidents occurred in nuclear power plants in Ukraine and Chernobyl, the Soviet Union. The accident caused 3 1 person to die on the spot, and tens of thousands of people died or became seriously ill due to the long-term influence of radioactive materials. Up to now, there are still abnormal fetuses born under the influence of radiation.