From what you said, you have hinted that you are a kind-hearted person. Since you have a good heart, why don't you give them a chance to survive? Maybe everyone has done a lot of good things, but it doesn't mean that I have the right to buy animals and take out their internal organs by donating money to build a bridge. Please think about it, which of those lives that we have chewed just offended or infringed on us? Don't! If we all have the heart to slaughter, dismember and devour those creatures who have no injustice to us, and we don't care about their most piercing and miserable cries and the fear of crying in the face of death, then this is also called "kindness" ... further proving that these kindness are just what we say.
02. Meat is so delicious, why can't you not be a vegetarian?
Because God knows, God knows, you know, I know, even WU GANG, who lives on the moon, knows that no animal was eaten voluntarily, and they all ran wildly before being caught.
We work hard to make money every day, of course, hoping to eat well, live well and make good use of it. Why else do we work so hard to work overtime? Life is boring without eating meat.
A: After listening to your words, Madonna, the female singer who wrote the Guinness Book of World Records as the highest-paid singer of the year, should not be a vegetarian. The figure created by the pop singer is an annual income of 50 million dollars. She works hard, too. She often dances, practices songs and travels around. Why don't people need meat to regulate their body and mind? Besides, if you really want to taste delicious food, high-end vegetable dishes can also make your index finger move. It's not just the food made by animals that is delicious!
04. As long as you live up to your conscience, why should you limit your diet?
A: Conscience is the hardest thing to judge. You can put three shrimps, a chicken leg and a pinch of vegetables in a bowl of rice. The same bowl of rice, you can also be a shrimp, add some gravy and three pinch of vegetables. Since these things are optional, that is to say, we can do them, what is the standard of people's so-called conscience (or needs)?
05. Humans let animals die because they need food! Animals are eaten by us, at least equivalent to doing something meaningful.
A: Whether it is a "meaningful thing" or a "meaningless thing", the party who is always going to be sacrificed is willing to do such a thing, isn't it? Otherwise, would you like someone to sacrifice your house and donate it to poor African refugees? It is also very meaningful! Besides, there is no good reason for human beings to kill animals for food. I can let you know that this is really the case with a question. Excuse me, do you agree that someone will go to the market to buy live fish and then go to the playground to play fish as a baseball? I don't think you agree either! However, people who play with fish may tell you, "Don't people usually say that food, clothing, housing and entertainment are equally important?" ? You think "food" is very important to you, then I think "music" is more important to me! You can eat fish, why can't I hit the fish as a ball? If he asks you this question, what should you answer? What's more, how much meat most people eat and the way they eat meat are different from "having fun"? Therefore, it is really unreasonable for human beings to slaughter animals for food.
06. Being a vegetarian will make you lose your strength.
A: Then Sun Zhen Ji should be last in every game. South Korean athlete Sun Zhenji was the champion of the 1 1 Olympic marathon held in Berlin, which was also the first Olympic gold medal in Korean history. Because Sun was a vegetarian for life, he changed the stereotype that "vegetarianism will lead to no physical strength" and also led to the prevalence of vegetarianism in Germany in the future. Sun died at the age of 90, and his bronze statue stood in Berlin.
07. Chickens are for people to eat, otherwise why keep them?
A: People don't "raise" it, but say that everyone "plans" it.
08. "Everything in the world supports people", so why not eat animals?
A: What you said sounds right at first glance, but it's not. Because there are stones and sea water on the earth, why do people not eat stones when they are hungry and drink sea water when they are thirsty? Therefore, obviously not everything is used to support people. As for whether animals exist to support people, we can fully understand it by looking at one thing. That is, if God (or God) really wants to treat animals as precious food for human beings, why is it easy to get cancer if you eat too much meat? Since it is for everyone to enjoy, why take away the health and lives of countless people? Besides, why can people who only eat fruits and vegetables without meat not only live a healthy life, but also prevent cancer? Therefore, from this information, we can understand God's will-not everything in the world is used to support people.
09. Being a vegetarian will affect the business of aquaculture.
A: Then Lincoln should not liberate slaves.
10. The animal closest to human blood is chimpanzee, but it has been proved in recent years that chimpanzees also eat meat. Of course, we humans can also eat meat, can't we?
A: Chimpanzees do eat eggs, insects or other small breastfeeding actions at some time. However, you may not know that chimpanzees eat only 1% to 2% of their total food. What percentage of food do people eat every day? In addition, if chimpanzees eat meat, people should also eat meat. The most qualified person should be Dr. Jane Goode, because chimpanzees can eat meat but she found it! But why is Dr. jane goodall a lifelong vegetarian? Moreover, she once said, "the meat on the plate symbolizes fear, pain and death to me, and I don't want to eat it." In addition, by the way, many people put forward the theory of evolution and natural selection, and then explained themselves: "Because the fittest survive in nature, people can certainly eat meat. "In fact, people who say these words don't know that Darwin, a biologist who put forward these two theories, is also a lifelong vegetarian! This is worth thinking about. Why did Jane Goodall and Darwin do this?
1 1. Humans have been eating meat since primitive times, so what's wrong with eating meat?
A: In fact, primitive people ate meat, but that doesn't mean we have to eat meat. Just as some early nations in the world had the habit of headhunting, it doesn't mean that their descendants should follow suit. This is an evolution. Besides, do you think primitive people should eat meat when they eat meat? If so, that's not good. Many archaeologists and anthropologists in modern times found that in the first millions of years of human evolution, people only ate fruits and vegetables, not animals. This situation has not changed after three ice ages. However, in the fourth ice age, the snow-covered land could no longer grow enough fruits and vegetables to meet human needs. In order to survive, our ancestors were forced to get meat from animals. Although the last ice age passed safely, everyone was used to eating meat. Today, you know the whole situation, and you know that our real ancestors were vegetarians. Maybe you should consider waiting until the next ice age to eat meat.
12. If people are vegetarian, the earth will be full of animals. Isn't it the same if there is a problem then?
A: Listening to you say that will make me misunderstand that you eat meat to reduce the number of animals. In fact, the number of animals will not increase endlessly because humans don't eat them, just as people never eat dragonflies, butterflies, flies and ladybugs, but they don't become potholes. On the other hand, due to human plunder, many wild animals continue to become extinct. Now scientists point out that if people's greed is not improved, all marine fish on the earth will disappear by 2048.
13. Hyenas eat antelopes, brown bears eat salmon, ducks eat earthworms ... Humans are animals, why can't they eat meat?
Answer: hyenas, bears, ducks ... it's really unfair to you to hope to be equal to them. The difference between humans and carnivores is that they have no choice, but we can choose our own food through compassion. In addition, one thing you must not know is that almost all carnivores usually eat hungry! It often takes a long time to have a full meal. As for people, this is not the case at all. Besides sleeping and going to the toilet, when is there a chance not to enjoy the delicious food with meat? Why don't people learn from them at this point?
14. The law of nature is the law of the jungle. What's wrong with eating meat? If you don't eat, you are an idiot! Besides, if all the meals are vegetarian, won't people eat more pesticides?
A: After listening to it, I suddenly felt a little confused about the view of "the law of the jungle", because in this world that has evolved over millions of years, how can it be taken for granted to "bully the weak" while "protect the weak" seems like a fool? In addition, it is completely wrong to think that people who eat vegetables eat more pesticides than people who eat meat. Because pigs, cows, fish and ducks usually eat feed from oats, corn, soybeans and other feed crops, and these crops have also been sprayed with pesticides. After these pesticides are eaten by livestock, pesticides accumulate in the muscles of livestock over time, and finally humans eat livestock into their stomachs. Therefore, meat eaters never thought that they ate more pesticides than vegetarians 13 times (this is a research report put forward by Edward State University in the United States). I wonder if you are worried about yourself and your family now that you know the truth. In addition to a large number of pesticides mentioned just now, not to mention that meat also contains antibiotics, hormones, ptomaine, croton poison, malachite green, polychlorinated biphenyls, heavy metals, dioxins ... These substances do not need to be eaten first, just listening is enough to make people dizzy.
15. Vegetarians are also killing animals, because pesticides are sprayed on vegetables, even more than meat eaters!
A: This is completely wrong, because the fact is-of course, meat eaters kill more. The evidence is as follows:
1. Macroscopically, aquatic animals such as fish, shrimp and crabs can lay thousands of eggs at a time. If the mother is not eaten, these thousands of eggs can breed thousands of offspring after hatching. As can be seen from this analogy, this number is very large. Vegetable bugs can only lay dozens of eggs at a time, and even if they are calculated in the same way, their numbers can't keep up.
Secondly, assuming that the main culprit of vegetable insect death caused by spraying pesticides on crops is vegetarians, the number of insect deaths caused by meat eaters is still the first. The reason is that everyone forgets that livestock have to eat feed, and the food made into feed is also killed by pesticides. Chickens, ducks, pigs and cows eat so much feed all their lives (leading to the death of vegetable worms). People raise livestock to get their meat, so we can't put the responsibility for the death of these vegetable worms on innocent livestock.
Since these responsibilities belong to meat eaters, and the amount of pesticides consumed by meat eaters is 13 times that of vegetarians, it is enough to prove that meat eaters kill far more vegetable worms than vegetarians.
Finally, no vegetarian wants farmers to use pesticides to kill insects. It should even be said that farmers had better never use pesticides (because no one wants to eat pesticides, crops can grow without spraying pesticides), so it is not completely fair to say that "vegetarians are also killing creatures". But meat eaters. People who eat meat can't say to the butcher, "I want to eat meat, but you mustn't kill it." It can be seen that the animals eaten by meat eaters died for him completely and directly, and the butcher just took money to "do it for him". These two situations can't be compared in any way. I believe you can see clearly which is unintentional and which is intentional.
16. Didn't the health education textbook say that you should eat six kinds of food every day? Doesn't being a vegetarian mean not listening to the teacher?
A: The six categories of food refer to "whole grains", "vegetables", "fruits", "eggs, beans and fish", "milk" and "oil, sugar and salt". Its origin was released by the United States Department of Agriculture in 1956, and then everyone obediently followed suit. But look, after years of "human life" statistics, the result of this diet is to accelerate the death of people. At present, the top ten causes of death in advanced countries in the world are almost all related to meat except traffic accidents. 1956 is too far away from today. 1956, our grandparents were still running around in sandals! In fact, as early as 199 1 year, the Great Committee of Responsible Doctors put forward four new food categories: grains, vegetables, fruits and beans to replace the original six food categories of USDA, and emphasized that this all-vegetable diet without eggs and milk is the hope of human health in the future. Then you may think, in that case, why not change the content of the textbook quickly? How can you keep teaching the wrong knowledge? The reason is simple, because all countries in the world have the same specialty, that is, "politicians." Politicians always want votes from animal husbandry, catering industry and vested interests. How can they care if you eat healthily? As long as you can hide it, you will still vote for him with your family next time.
17. Plants also have life! Isn't eating plants also killing life? Moreover, a pig can be eaten by dozens of people, which is called life. Plants are so small, they will kill more when they are full!
A: What you just said almost left me speechless, but in fact, your statement is not only completely wrong, but also misleading. In terms of scientific physiology and anatomy, domestic animals such as pigs, sheep and cattle have complex blood vessels and nervous systems like humans, while plants do not. Although plants also have life phenomena such as growth and reproduction, it cannot be concluded that plants and animals are sentient, thinking and behavioral lives, and everything always depends on scientific evidence. Therefore, if you say that "eating plants also kills life", you will lose objectivity first. In addition, animals and plants are quite different in other ways. For example, when we only take some leafy vegetables from the field to cook at home and pick apples from trees to eat, after a while, they will all grow new leaves and fruits. However, the physiological structure of animals can't do this at all. If you want to try a pot of stewed pig's trotters, when you chop off the pig's hind legs, the pig will never grow the same legs again in his life. From the above example, we can find that plants and animals are unequal. Therefore, people can't insist that eating plants = eating animals = killing animals cruelly in order to deny plant food or because they want to eat meat. This kind of logic and practice is wrong. Maybe, after all I said just now, you still don't agree. If so, it doesn't matter. For the time being, we are willing to assume that "plants are equal to animals" and then compare "who kills more".
If one day things really become "plants are equal to animals", then I will still say that meat eaters kill more. The same reason is because animals have to eat feed to grow up. Now scholars have found that every 100 kg of grain can only be converted into about 7 kg of pork or 6 kg of beef after being used by humans to feed livestock. The feed these pigs, cows, chickens and ducks eat is also obtained from feed crops (slaughter). People raise livestock for its meat, so the responsibility of eating these feeds (slaughter) cannot be shirked to innocent livestock. Therefore, in recent years, experts have solemnly pointed out that the food consumption of a meat eater is actually twelve times that of a vegetarian (note). Excuse me, if eating plants is also killing, who kills more cruelly?
As for "a pig can feed dozens of people, it is called a life." Plants are so small, eating will kill more! This is just a cover-up, which will make people think it is true. In fact, the correct comparison method should be: whether vegetarian or non-vegetarian, it is fair to assume that both sides eat the same amount of food per meal. Now, if we assume that vegetarians and meat eaters eat 600g of food per meal, then you multiply the pork in the meat eater's bowl (assuming100g) by the slaughter amount of 14 times (because every100kg of grain can only be converted into about 7kg of pork), and then multiply the beef in the meat eater's bowl (assuming 50g) by/ Finally, because vegetarians don't eat meat, of course, the number of plants killed in the bowl doesn't have to be multiplied by any multiple, so it's easy for both sides to compare and know who killed more at once, right? Arguing with people about "who kills more animals, meat or vegetarian" is really a drooling thing, so if you really sympathize with the fate of plants, you should know that vegetarian food is the right choice in order to reduce the consumption of plants! If after our discussion, your diet is still the same ... This reminds me of what a vegetarian once said: "People who are unfriendly to animals don't need to care about plants hypocritically." If you believe in "good luck", you will know that eating meat is not only a very harmful thing, but also a waste of resources such as land and manpower. Sometimes people will use "plants also hurt" or "plants also feel" to ask questions, and the answers are almost the same. As long as we can prove who ate a lot of plants, we can prove who caused more pain. Because vegetarians eat less plants than meat eaters, vegetarians are sure to win on such issues.
18. Humans have two canine teeth, indicating that both humans and mice are omnivores. Since humans are omnivores, of course, even meat can be eaten! Isn't it?
A: Why does everyone compare mice with themselves this time? Humans should be higher. I'm not exaggerating to say that we are omnivores with "human canine teeth". People who think they are smart enough to put forward this opinion have really killed trillions of lives. Because of this sentence, many former vegetarian friends gave up, and at the same time, millions of meat eaters found the pillar of eating with peace of mind. No matter how persuaded, it is difficult to change their preconceived ideas. In fact, people are herbivores. Herbivores are characterized by a long digestive system, such as cattle, sheep, horses and camels. This is because the fiber of plants is longer than that of meat and needs a long intestine to digest and absorb. Generally, the intestines of herbivores are ten times as long as their bodies, while the intestines of human beings are about eleven times as long as their own. Compared with herbivores, the intestines of carnivores are very short, with an average length of only three times. This is because meat decays quickly, and if it stays in the body for too long, it will poison the blood, so they have evolved shorter digestive tubes with ten times more gastric acid than herbivores, so that these meats can be digested quickly and excreted. Humans don't have as much stomach acid as carnivores. Besides the digestive system, we also know that carnivores drool when they see raw meat, just like cats see raw fish. However, people will not drool when they see raw meat. If they put raw meat close to their faces, they will feel sick. On the contrary, when people see grapes, mangoes, pineapples and other fruits, their reaction is to drool involuntarily at once. This physiological reaction fully shows that people are herbivores. As for the teeth mentioned just now, herbivores have flat teeth and developed molars, mainly for grinding food, with their mouths left and right, and chewing slowly; As for carnivores, they have sharp teeth and developed canine teeth, which are mainly used to tear food. When they eat, their mouths are closed up and down, and they "swallow" into their stomachs almost without biting. From these aspects, it is obvious that people are herbivores. As for the two "canine teeth" that many people don't understand, I really want to ask, does the appearance of "canine teeth" in an animal's mouth mean that this animal is a carnivore? Must its function be to tear the flesh of other animals? If so, I'd like to know how you bit the apple when you took the first bite. Did you bite with your front teeth? Or squeeze the apple into your mouth and bite it with your teeth? People don't "tear" apples with canine teeth! At the beginning, it was put forward that "human beings have canine teeth, so they should eat meat." The biggest mistake is that this man doesn't know enough about animals. Because the animal with the longest canine teeth in the world is not a lion or a tiger, nor is it the largest carnivore on land, but an unexpected animal-hippo. The canine teeth of its upper jaw are more than 20 cm, and the canine teeth of its lower jaw are exposed from the gums for 40 cm, and it can continue to grow. The total number of canine teeth can reach more than 70 cm, and the most terrible thing is that the weight of each tooth can be as high as 3 kg! However, a hippo with big body and long fangs like this really doesn't know what to live on. Why doesn't it also use its "canine teeth" to "bite" the fish around it?
For thousands of years, vegetarians have always been misunderstood, ridiculed and questioned.
From now on, let's blow the horn of "turning over a new leaf", not for our own grievances, nor for arguing with others, but to implant the correct truth into people's hearts and help animals and creatures avoid suffering.