As far as teaching is concerned, I think there are the following differences between a good university and an ordinary university:
One: learning atmosphere. A good university learning atmosphere is much stronger. After the hard work of senior three, many people will have a rest after entering the university. Without a good atmosphere, these people will just muddle along all day. But in a good university, if everyone else is studying and no one is with you, I think you will choose to study.
Second: teacher allocation. In universities, there are counselors who are responsible for students' ideological and political work, that is, the role of middle school class teachers. I think this is a very important position. But many counselors are not responsible at all, and some even don't know their students for a year. Of course, there are also student factors, but as counselors, such students should be the object of concern, because some of them really have ideological problems. Counselors should correctly guide students in many aspects such as thinking, study and life. As for other aspects, many teachers and professors in ordinary universities are superficial. Some professors are mixed names. Do you expect them to preach, teach and dispel doubts for you?
Three: whether to teach students in accordance with their aptitude. I think this is more difficult because universities can't teach students in accordance with their aptitude now. It is impossible for schools to offer special courses for students with different levels and different acceptance abilities. In fact, it is a classroom, and a teacher faces 70 or 80 students. But in a better university, libraries and good lectures can make up for this defect a little.
This answer was recommended by the questioner.