After picking up Mr. Shang's mobile phone, the young people's attitude changed from refusing to return it to asking for nothing in return, just because they were moved by the photos and messages of love for the disaster area in the mobile phone. The young man was blinded by greed, but Mr. Shang's love, like a clear spring, washed away the dust in his heart and made him return to the right path of life in time. Imagine, if there is no "love" in this mobile phone, once Mr. Shang wants to call the police, the trouble brought by this young man is self-evident.
However, in society, it is not uncommon for freshmen to "stumble" because of lack of love guidance. He stole more than 10 thousand yuan from his roommate a month, but refused to admit it because he was afraid of being beaten by his roommate, and finally he was jailed. Shimou, Luquan, Hebei, 16 years old was beaten for stealing his father's money. He ran away from home with a grudge. Later, he was arrested for theft many times, and his life was ruined ... because of greed, he ruined his future. What is the reason? For the time being, please don't lift the moral stick to slay those who stumble. Please look at their mentality when they make mistakes: fear and resentment. If we believe that "at the beginning of life, human nature is good", we should guide them with tolerance and love, so that good can overcome evil. However, in today's society, helping the elderly is vilified, caring donations are questioned, and people fight if they don't give up their seats. In an atmosphere of suspicion and violence, you will make trouble. Accustomed to fists, violence is normal. Therefore, the stumbling novice is desperate in fear, and would rather accept the condemnation of conscience than add fists and feet. There is no love on the road of "transformation", love is aphasia in violence and love disappears in violence. It can only watch helplessly as it stumbles into the abyss of sin.
If we can give the "wrongdoers" a beacon of love, they will not necessarily get lost on the road of life. When the writer Lin Qingxuan was a reporter, he reported the news of a thief who committed thousands of crimes and had exquisite modus operandi, and lamented: "A thief with such meticulous thoughts will achieve something in whatever he does!" It is this sentence that changed the thief's life. Now, the thieves in those days were the big bosses of several stores. As the saying goes, "Good words make three winters warm", and Lin Qingxuan's kind words, such as the sunshine in winter, make the thief feel care in the cold, and like a lamp in the dark, let the thief find the direction of life in the dark. "To err is human, to err is human." Love tolerates mistakes and overcomes demons with love. I remember that 32 people were killed in the campus tragedy in Virginia, but 33 balloons symbolizing the dead were released, 33 boulders engraved with the names of the dead were under the trees in the mourning area, 33 mourning bells rang, and 33 candles in the vigil ceremony-all with the murderer's share. The Christian spirit they practice is a kind of compassion in which love and hate are separated. Honestly, love can't save the murderer, but it gives the world spiritual guidance-
The road to "reform" needs love. This kind of "love" can be love, tolerance and encouragement ... as long as it can influence others, it can be called the love needed for "reform" No one wants to be a stumbling block at birth, but sometimes they make mistakes because they can't stand the temptation. In fact, as long as they are willing to guide "stumbling" people in a loving way, they will certainly be able to return to the right path of life. Although it can't make the whole world green, it can be bathed in spiritual oases. If everyone can use love to guide "sliding", then fewer and fewer people will commit crimes. Why should people always be afraid of "guarding against thieves"?
The road to reform needs love, so please don't be stingy with your love.
Teacher's comments
As far as an exam-oriented composition is concerned, this paper has three characteristics of excellent composition: profound thought, beautiful style of writing and clear structure. 1, with profound thoughts, such as the quotations and arguments in the third paragraph, which are close to reality and point to the present. 2. Beautiful literary style, such as the use of metaphor and parallelism in the fourth paragraph, presents the poetic beauty of intuitive images. 3. The structure is clear, and the materials are combined at the beginning. Concise and clear, in one go. However, as far as an article is concerned, the viewpoint of the article is too idealistic, and the "need for love" has become "only love", which overemphasizes the power of love and ignores the conditions for the construction of the legal system and the development of civilization, and seems to be a castle in the air. Although the article can show positive energy and play a harmonious hymn, it lacks insight and penetration to reflect on the present and reconstruct the path.
(Guo Zijian, a Chinese teacher at Guangzhou Sixth Middle School)
Non-teacher comments
I can't help but want to scold the exam-oriented composition: don't let middle school students write purely argumentative essays, especially don't let them face the discrimination of value dilemma, okay? Throughout this article, the author has exhausted his knowledge reserve and logical ability, but he still feels powerless. I don't think this is the author's own problem, but she has to face a topic that is still difficult to control at her age.
Of course, it is useful to strengthen logic training in some small places, such as trying not to use full-name judgment sentences, such as "as long as they are willing to guide' stumble' in a loving way, they will definitely return to the right path of life and their future is bright." This kind of sentence can't stand the blow of counterexample. In fact, the author herself knows this, otherwise she wouldn't say, "The rain of love, although it didn't make the whole world green, can bathe in spiritual oases."
If I am more than 20 years older than the author, I may write the old topic "Morality is not too idle, and morality can enter and leave". It seems that picking up things is not a virtue problem, but a virtue problem, so young people are very moved. If we affirm this behavior, we will fall into an ethical dilemma. Suppose the picker reads the SMS and finds that the owner of the mobile phone has donated money to the disaster area. The reaction of young people reflects the disconnection of social education: we can't treat love with greed, can we treat greed with greed? In fact, donating money to the disaster area is not an obligation, but a moral bottom line. "Not returning things" should be denied more than "not donating money to the disaster area".