The textbook catalogue requires new Japanese 1-4 volumes, which is amazing!
That's the first level of Japanese major
In addition, I want to know how big the black box of Su Da is.
First, about the composition of the test paper:
The preliminary examination paper of Suzhou University's postgraduate entrance examination for law majors consists of comprehensive papers and professional papers, and the score of each paper is 150. Judging from this year's exam, the knowledge of various courses is no longer mixed together, but divided into several clear parts. As far as procedural law is concerned, the comprehensive volume is divided into constitution, jurisprudence, criminal law and civil law (the comprehensive volume of each major should be the same), and the proportion of each course is similar, so the weight is different. The reason for this classification is to let candidates have a clear idea of answering questions, so the knowledge points of each course should not have comprehensive questions. The comprehensive volume consists of courses related to the specific major you are applying for. Taking the specialty of procedural law as an example, it consists of criminal procedure law, civil procedure law and evidence law.
Two. On the Constitution
Many junior students in grade 08 "reflect" that Zhang's constitutional law seems a little depressed at first glance, or feel that it has no effect and can't remember any knowledge points, as if it were the same as when we were studying jurisprudence. This is the difference between Zhang Constitution and other constitutions. Zhang's constitutional science focuses on the principles and theories of the constitution, or the study of the development of constitutional science. Instead of focusing on China's constitutional system like other constitutional textbooks, it rarely involves the principle part of the constitution, so it feels as obscure as jurisprudence when reviewing, so some people ask whether it is necessary to find an authoritative constitutional law to replace it. In fact, in the examination, the emphasis is on the examination of constitutional principles and related theories, and it does not involve the specific constitutional system of our country. Therefore, we suggest that Qian Fan's constitutional law should be given priority to, supplemented by other constitutional law textbooks. If you feel that time is tight, you can even skip it. The Constitution can be reviewed in September or 10. The specific review suggestion is to sit the whole book thoroughly and carefully first, and then only read the summary of the last chapter.
Three. On criminal law
Many students in 2008 complained that Li Xiaoming's two criminal laws were too thick and inconsistent. Is it necessary to read other criminal law books? There are two things to be clear here: First, this book is not Li Xiaoming's monograph, and the monograph is naturally incoherent. Moreover, Li Xiaoming did put forward many original ideas in it. Personally, I feel that Li Xiaoming's views cannot be said to be authoritative. Because Professor Zhang Mingkai of Tsinghua University also agrees with the three elements, on this issue, we can only say that it is a different theoretical viewpoint, or the development of the four elements, and it is an innovative viewpoint. Teacher Li Xiaoming insists on the three elements, but often chooses the general theory when making the final conclusion. Of course, as a scholar, it is difficult to be unique in the current academic atmosphere, so obeying the conclusion can only be said to be a kind of helplessness. As a graduate student of Soochow University, it is better to answer questions according to Li Xiaoming's point of view, which is also the greatest support and spiritual comfort for Li Xiaoming. Second, candidates for other majors other than criminal law should pay attention to the general principles of criminal law as a key review. There are few things in the specific provisions of criminal law, which are basically a topic. For example, this year's comprehensive volume has only one topic that is close to reality: the discussion on the crime of money laundering. At that time, the country was carrying out a special struggle against money laundering, so this test question was given. You can arrange the review of the specific provisions of the criminal law according to your own actual situation. Of course, if we feel that we are studying the specific provisions of criminal law at undergraduate level,
Four. On evidence law
The Civil Procedure Law is co-authored by many professors, so there are many viewpoints. Among them, the discussion on the evidence system mainly introduces the evidence system in China, and the Research on the Principles of Evidence in Civil Procedure is the monograph of Zhang Yongquan, a procedural law teacher of Soviet University. The characteristic of this book is to absorb and introduce many advanced things in the Anglo-American legal system, which is a suggestion for improving the evidence system in China and also an innovation and trend. Therefore, the evidence part of the civil procedure law still needs to be read, and the professional volume is also divided into two parts: criminal litigation and civil litigation. Of course, the civil litigation part should use the contents of the evidence part of the civil procedure law. There seems to be no evidence section in this year's procedural law professional course examination paper, or it may be found in the knowledge of other disciplines. I don't know what will happen in 2008, but it shouldn't account for a large proportion. The focus is still on criminal and civil proceedings. So review well. Regarding the review of evidence law, I suggest that you focus on mastering the evidence system I have learned, and regard the advanced part of the Anglo-American legal system as the deficiency of our evidence system, or grasp the places that need to be improved.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) about review plan
During the postgraduate entrance examination, it is very necessary to have a review plan, but the plan does not need to be too detailed. As we all know, there will still be one thing or another during the postgraduate entrance examination. If the plan is too detailed, once it is delayed, it will not be completed, but will cause unnecessary pressure and tension to yourself. As the saying goes, plans can't keep up with changes ~ ~! So it's best to make a slightly macro plan, such as which book to read today, how many pages to read, how many pages to read, how many months to read the first time, and how many months to read the second time. It is best to review professional courses together. We do not advocate divide and conquer, because if you review one course first and then another, it is easy to forget what you have reviewed before, and it will be boring to review only one course.
Intransitive verbs about review methods
When reviewing professional courses, we should learn to grasp the key points on the basis of comprehensive review, and naturally we should master the basic knowledge in the book in an all-round way, while the chapters that often appear in the preliminary examination over the years focus on the comprehensive basis. The questions in the procedural law are very basic, and there are no questions beyond the designated textbooks, so reviewing books is the most important. It is best to review the knowledge in the book for the first time. The second or third time, you should be able to choose basic knowledge and key knowledge. Some things can be skimmed, and some things can be ignored, that is, you can do something or not. Tutors' papers generally don't involve test questions, so there is no need to spend time and experience to pay attention to this aspect alone. Students often ask us what the key points are. It's actually quite simple. The chapters that often appear in the test questions over the years are naturally key chapters. It is very important to take notes during the review, because there is no time to turn over the assigned textbooks in the final stage of the review. If you have your own notes, you will save a lot of time and energy, which is very comfortable. The specific methods of taking notes are as follows:
1. When reviewing for the first time, you should be comprehensive and meticulous. This stage is the stage of laying the foundation, and there is no need to refer to the papers of previous years, because even if there is no problem with the papers of previous years, there may be problems in 2008. And for the first time, it has the function of systematizing book knowledge, which is the effect of the first time.
2. Look at your specific review situation. If you feel that the book has not been reviewed for the first time, and then read it carefully for the second time, you need to use the questions of the past years at this time. At the same time, we should focus on the chapters that often appear in the test questions. In this case, you can wait until the third time to take notes.
If you are satisfied with reading it once, you can take notes for the second time. Because there is plenty of time at this time, you can take notes in detail as much as possible, and you can take notes in every chapter. The specific content of features and elements can be expanded appropriately, and it is not necessary to be too detailed when reading it for the third time. After reviewing for the third time, it's almost the end of the term, so you can focus on your notes, and the book can temporarily take a back seat ~!
Will the designated textbooks change in 2008?
We don't have the function of foresight, otherwise we would have bought lottery tickets. Hehe, judging from the changes in 2007, it is not very big. Our procedural law has added the Constitution, and the designated textbook of criminal law has changed from Professor Zhang Mingkai's criminal law to Teacher Li Xiaoming's criminal law, and other majors should be similar. For details, we can refer to last year's designated textbooks, from which we can know that the textbooks written or participated in by Suzhou University teachers will not change. As far as procedural law is concerned, they are Zhou Yongkun's jurisprudence, Li Xiaoming's criminal jurisprudence and Hu's civil procedural law. If you are uneasy about last year's enrollment brochure, you can review these subjects first.
Eight. About answering questions
Look at the questions carefully before you answer them. For example, the penultimate question in civil litigation this year is to ask yourself to draw up a topic and then discuss it. It seems that only four candidates have drawn up questions, and the answers should be comprehensive, such as involving a knowledge point, answering concepts, components, characteristics, what shortcomings need to be improved, and even the differences with similar concepts. ~ ~ The words are not tedious, but comprehensive ~!