Because Sun Quan was worried about the survival of Soochow, Wu Guotai reminded him that "you should not ask Zhou Yu about foreign affairs", and he quickly sent someone to Poyang Lake to recall Zhou Yu, commander-in-chief of the water army.
Zhou Yugui and Lu Su led Zhuge Liang to welcome Zhou. Lu Su asked Zhou Yu whether to make peace or fight the main battle. Zhou Yu meant to fight the main battle, but deliberately said peace. Lu Su believed it and argued with him. Zhuge Liang had already seen Zhou Yu's mind, wanted to inspire Zhou Yu, and sneered at him.
When Liang accepted Yu's inquiry, he deliberately said that he would make peace with Cao Cao, suggesting that as long as Er Qiao from Jiangdong gave him a gift, Cao Cao would withdraw, and quoted the sentence "Take Er Qiao to the southeast, seize the day" in Cao Zhi's Ode to Tongquetai, proving that Cao Cao really wanted Er Qiao.
After hearing this, I cursed Cao Cao for being cruel. Bright false don't understand, and Yu explained that "is Sun Ce's wife, Joe is Yu's wife. I hope that Kong Ming will help me and break Cao Cao. " Seeing that Zhou Yu didn't want to be bullied, Zhuge Liang promised to break Cao's plan with him.
Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu's words were heard by Zhou Yu's beloved wife Xiao Qiao. She said to Zhou Yu, "Even if cao thief doesn't send troops for my sisters, once Jiangnan falls, my wife and children will fall into the hands of cao thief." This made Zhou Yu more determined to resist Cao.
Extended data:
The writing subject of Romance of the Three Kingdoms obviously has no consciousness of distinguishing between history and literature, so the novel text does not present the concept of distinguishing between history and literature, and all story elements and discourse expressions of history and literature are chaotic and tangled.
It is precisely because of the limitation of innate aesthetic concept that the novel is smeared as a mixed text that is neither history nor in line with the general provisions of literature.
On the other hand, the identity of history and literature is related in philosophical sense. They should and inevitably show the objective laws of history and its contingent structure. In other words, both history and literature inevitably imply historical rationality and dialectical logic.