Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - What are the advantages and disadvantages of a university monitor?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a university monitor?
The advantages and disadvantages of a university monitor are as follows:

Benefits:

Judge the best first. During college, the monitor will be given priority evaluation, including scholarships. In fact, university scholarships require not only good study, but also many aspects. In addition to scholarships, various benefits, such as three good, five good, party member, advanced, postgraduate entrance examination and so on. , the display will be preferred.

Being a monitor will also have a lot of contact with school leaders and teachers. Networking is very important during college, so don't think about studying hard. After entering the society, if we only learn this advantage well, maybe after one or two years, it will be very unfavorable to get along with some popular classmates.

Disadvantages:

In universities, the monitor is usually called the teacher's "dog". Because of the important positions such as squad leader and league secretary, the guide will ask to be on call. You never know how many activities there are in a school. Because every time the tour guide asks you, he will say "xxx, there are activities in the afternoon. Please find some classmates to clean the venue. " Then you start to gather the students in the class. Over time, the students in the class will get used to it. Every time the monitor calls someone, the students know that they have to work for the guide again.

In addition, another disadvantage of being a monitor is that students will hold grudges in various evaluations. Think about it carefully, scholarships are evaluated according to academic performance, quantitative scores, and late arrival and early departure. Tour guides usually do not manage the calculation of quantitative scores. The general quantitative score is managed by the monitor, the Communist Youth League Secretary and the Commission for Discipline Inspection.

When the scholarship is evaluated, even if the monitor evaluates it fairly. Students who don't get a scholarship will also think that the monitor tampered with the quantitative score. This leads to students in the class being unfriendly to the monitor before and after the scholarship evaluation every year.