My classmate, in a nearby county, has a low salary and moves bricks every summer vacation. So do many of their colleagues. During the two months of the holiday, they can work in the south for two months to make money to subsidize their families. Just like college students on vacation, you can go to restaurants to serve plates and hand out leaflets.

I know a teacher friend who drives Didi in his spare time and uses his new car. The service is very good. "Once I pulled a parent, she was petrified. When I opened the car door for her, I saw that her expression was very complicated. " The teacher told us his experience, which was not embarrassing at all. I heard more than one colleague say: nothing, go for a run.

When teachers are regarded as an ordinary profession, what they need to do is to abide by professional rules. On the basis of not violating professional ethics, talking about money doesn't hurt feelings, and it has nothing to do with the nobility and lowliness of the profession. You have the right to pursue happiness for your family and you have reason to pursue a better life.

The fundamental reason why people dislike teachers making up lessons is that teachers have broken the balance and are worried that teachers can't face a child fairly. People's desire and worry about fairness has always been a threshold. If it breaks down, complaints will flood in like a dam break.

Don't teach English, math and Chinese, just run a class, no one reports, no one cares. Even when the wind is the tightest, it is still booming. Because the weight of these teachers is not enough to affect the performance and status of children in the class. It is true that the ancients were not poor, but unequal.

The main teacher, especially the head teacher, can do anything as long as you don't make up lessons in the summer vacation!

Of course, you can sell fruits and buy pork!

This question is very interesting, and the present society is also very interesting.

1. Teachers are more professional in class, but they are not allowed to make up lessons. Once they make up lessons, it's like breaking the dogma. College students who have just graduated or have not graduated, and even others can make up lessons, and no one cares.

2. In private schools, some teachers can attend classes without teacher qualification certificates, and other majors can also attend classes with teacher qualification certificates. Why can't teachers in public schools make up lessons for students during holidays? I think it's not wrong that only students have needs, students volunteer, teachers make up for them and give them some compensation appropriately.

3. Now teachers can go up the mountain to collect medicinal materials, work on the construction site, sell fruits, and do anything other than major (class), but they can't make up lessons.

Professional people don't do professional things, and unprofessional people can do professional things. Doctors and migrant workers can make up lessons, and teachers can't even take holidays. Teachers can do what migrant workers do.

In short, the society is looking at teachers with color-changing eyes, thinking that teachers are monsters and should be under Wuzhishan.

In fact, the teacher is very busy and tired in normal class, leaving early and returning late. To have a rest during the holidays, to adjust one's nerves all day at the beginning of school, to make up lessons during the summer vacation, or to sell fruits to make money, these are all forced by life, and they are also helpless actions for teachers to improve their lifestyle.

I am a teacher, too. In a high school in a small county, relying on meager wages and a small amount of welfare, it is difficult to support the family expenses. I can only say that I am struggling to survive. There is no gray income that many people say, and I have never thought about making any money from students, nor have I ever received any red envelopes from my parents. It is expressly stipulated that teachers cannot offer training courses and make up lessons during holidays. Therefore, it is illegal to make up lessons during holidays.

It is also expressly stipulated that teachers cannot engage in a second occupation. It is illegal to operate a business license to open a fruit shop and sell fruit in summer vacation. However, we can use tricycles or small stalls to sell fruit. This should do. After all, life forces teachers to talk about life. If not for survival, how many teachers are there? Will you give up the rest of your vacation and work hard?

This is a question that makes people laugh and cry. Most people do part-time jobs and choose their own majors. Who doesn't want to do what they are good at? And teachers, because of professional reasons, the state stipulates that they cannot make up lessons outside.

What is the reason for finding a part-time job? Compulsory make-up lessons are ok, but paid make-up lessons are now prohibited.

What can I do during the holiday to earn extra money? Anything that does not conflict with national policies will do.

Teachers make up lessons in summer vacation not only for income, but also for improving students' grades. I don't believe that any teacher can get high income and get rich by holding training courses. This is unlikely unless a professional training institution is doing this.

Secondly, teachers can also sell fruit, at least at home, as long as students are not forced to buy fruit. Who stipulates that teachers can't sell fruit in their spare time? And selling fruit can earn five or six hundred a day, so much the better. This is a very good thing.

Finally, although it is not allowed to make up classes now, many schools and places are still making up classes, and there is no way to prohibit it! About whether to make up lessons? I think it depends on the students' personal energy. Can they learn anything? If you can absorb the knowledge in class and want to study further, then I think you can make up lessons, but if you study the knowledge in class with great difficulty, then I don't think it is necessary to make up lessons.

As for whether the teacher will sell fruit? That must be your personal freedom!

Just excerpted an author's answer: during holidays, in-service teachers are forbidden to make up lessons with pay, and it is not recommended to engage in paid work related to the education industry. But if the industry that makes money has nothing to do with education, and it is self-reliant and legal, I personally think it is still possible and worth promoting.

Can I understand it this way: after class, it is wrong for teachers to do what they are good at; It is right to do other industries that you are not good at.

Teachers are a big group. There must be some scum. Why not let the teacher make up lessons? Because of the scum, the teacher forced the students to make up. Then Mr. Slag will also force him to buy fruit. Ordinary teachers can earn five or six hundred, and slag teachers can earn one or two thousand!

Should I be killed with a stick, or should I punish the scum of the teachers?

During holidays, in-service teachers are prohibited from taking paid remedial classes, and it is not recommended to take paid jobs related to the education industry. However, if the profit-making industry has nothing to do with education and is self-reliant and operates legally, I personally think it is ok and worth promoting.

First, it is forbidden for in-service teachers to make up lessons with compensation for many reasons.

1. If you work part-time in an off-campus counseling institution, the "signboard" you use is "experienced front-line teachers in the school", which is highly recognized and attractive, almost "quality assurance". This "signboard" is given by the school platform and used by individual teachers to recruit students for counseling institutions. It also damaged the reputation of other law-abiding teachers and had a negative impact on the whole teaching team.

2. If you organize paid tutoring for your students, is there "abuse of power for personal gain" or "exchange of interests" in view of the fact that students and parents are "clients"? To tell the truth, if parents really need to find a tutor for their children, and the quality of teachers' teaching is good, then parents are still willing to let teachers give their children paid tutoring. After all, teachers are familiar with children's situation, and there is no running-in period and adaptation period. They can provide targeted counseling according to children's specific conditions, with good efficiency and effect. Teachers will try their best to help their students. In addition to being paid like others, if the children's grades improve, the average class score will also increase, and the teaching results in the school will be more weighted, killing two birds with one stone.

However, there are also great shortcomings. If parents want to choose other institutions for counseling and their children's teachers run remedial classes, how should they choose? It is very likely that the teacher I chose did it, although it is not very ideal; If parents and children don't want to take remedial classes, but the teacher "clearly" or "implies" that children need remedial classes, do you want to go or not? Many times I was forced to go, first because of my feelings, and second because I was afraid that the teacher would have opinions and opinions on the children; What should the teacher say in class is the same as that in the remedial class? It is completely unfair to the children who make up lessons with compensation, and it is unfair to other students rudely. The rumored "don't talk in class, talk in the remedial class" is more or less related to this.

Second, in-service teachers are not encouraged to participate in paid jobs related to the education industry for the same reason as the first one. The signboard effect of teachers' official identity and professional identity is still relatively large, and intentional or unintentional "standing and cheering" will also have adverse effects.

It is understandable that in-service teachers engage in jobs unrelated to education during holidays, as long as they operate legally.

1. The profession of teacher, whether promoted to "the engineer of human soul" or "the most glorious profession under the sun", or demoted to "poverty" and "pedantry", is essentially just a profession. Teachers also want to live their own lives, improve their quality of life, and make legal profits with their physical strength or intelligence. Those who call on teachers to be "willing to be poor" are not "willing to be poor" themselves, let alone "poor".

Whether it's summer vacation or winter vacation, whether it's selling fruit, opening Didi, writing articles or engaging in other industries, as long as it doesn't violate professional ethics and as long as it abides by industry regulations, it's ok. Everyone who has a positive attitude towards life pursues a better life, yearns for a happy life and works hard for his dreams. This is everyone's birthright, regardless of occupation or status.

It can be seen from this problem that teachers are very helpless at present, and it is against heaven for teachers to make up lessons, because the state expressly stipulates that teachers are not allowed to engage in commercial activities related to making up lessons, otherwise they may be punished or lose their jobs if they have bad morals or violate rules and regulations.

Where is the rationality of the policy?

1. Teachers are laborers who are responsible for national education. In principle, your ability and level have been purchased by the government through salary. The government hopes that teachers can spend more time studying business, studying and charging, so as to better serve their work. In short, if the state pays for the holiday, you should stop thinking about making money!

2. Controlling teachers can block public opinion and eliminate the negative impact of society on the education industry because of making up classes. If you have any complaints about making up lessons, it doesn't mean that our teacher is making a profit by making up lessons. Our teacher doesn't lecture or talk in class. Then making up lessons outside normal teaching becomes a voluntary business activity for both parties.

This is a one-size-fits-all approach used by our competent department. There is no other way to solve the problem faster and more directly. It is much simpler and easier to control teachers who eat financial meals directly under the education department than to control social training institutions. As for the negative impact, leave it to the next one to solve.

What are the shortcomings of that policy?

1. The teacher has tried to make up lessons, but she still has to find a way to solve the livelihood problem, because wages only care about food and clothing, and it is also a waste of labor to be idle for such a long holiday. If you don't make up lessons, you can sell fruit, be a nanny, do cleaning and do the work of migrant workers. The education department is temporarily out of control. Remember one thing, don't get caught, or it will have an impact on the image of the unit.

2. Education and training institutions can't hire in-service teachers, so they have to hire some retired college students who don't have teacher qualification certificates and do odd jobs during holidays to tutor students. There are so many educational institutions that the competent authorities can't control them. As long as the procedures are legal, children are easy to coax, and there is no report, the quality of teaching is second, and money can be earned.

3. The final result is that the improper practices of a few teachers have damaged the social image of teachers, and the irrational practices of parents and training institutions have led to the across-the-board practice of the competent authorities, depriving all teachers of the opportunity to earn extra money by making up lessons, leaving training institutions short of teachers and parents unable to find good training institutions. Only the competent department can sit back and relax.

Teachers are a noble profession and a sacred profession. They shoulder the heavy responsibility of "teaching and educating people" in society, so they are also an important and respected profession.

However, in today's society, people have high demands on teachers, but they often ignore that the treatment given to teachers is actually very low, and the contribution and return of knowledge cannot be directly proportional. Especially those primary and secondary school teachers who still have two or three thousand dollars, how difficult life is under the current living standard.

Although, in the eyes of outsiders, teachers' work is relatively easy and their welfare benefits are acceptable, there are still three months of winter and summer vacations at their disposal every year. Those with good family conditions can travel and relax, or use this time to learn to recharge and improve their quality and teaching level; Those with poor family conditions and high pressure in life need to take a second job in winter and summer vacations to make money to supplement their families.

What occupation can teachers who export knowledge for a living do in winter and summer vacation when the state explicitly prohibits teachers from making up lessons in winter and summer vacation to earn income? Selling physical strength and working on the construction site? Regardless of dignity, be a fruit vendor? In order to survive better, both are possible?

However, as a teacher, it is really appropriate to be so single-minded and helpless. Should we really sell our dignity in order to survive? Will it have a negative impact on teaching quality after the end of winter and summer vacations? Can teachers be competent to live as part-time workers and vendors by physical strength? If you work on the construction site by selling your physical strength, can you get the same remuneration as full-time migrant workers? Do you really earn 5600 yuan a day by selling fruit early? Are these questions worthy of our deep thinking?

Didn't you just report a few days ago that a civil servant did something that Didi driver didn't allow when he got off work at night?